This hot case is about collecting evidence of as many organ system failures as possible, and then deciding whether there is a satisfactory single explanation for them. There may not be.
Then, the real trick is coming up with a sensible plan of management, even if it is "quick, call the family".
Previous hot cases with this sort of theme to them can be found below.
The standard introductionAsk examiners about turning up the lights The environment
The physical examinationThe details of this section can be seen in the opposite column. The obs and investigationsThe Presentation |
The Physical Examination in Brief DetailAsk the examiners to sit the patient up Ask the examiners about any language barriers
Ask examiners to lay the patient flat.
Sit the patient back up again |
A pacing box?
Sensitivity and pacing threshold may not be relevant.
One can ask the examiners the following questions:
One should ask about the following parameters:
One should ask to look at the pressure-volume loops.
Take special note of the FiO2. This may be ridiculously high.
There may be surgical drains (what is in them? How much of it?). Asking how much has been coming out may be relevant in a hot case which focuses on the diagnosis of a shock state.
The pleural catheters are also interesting. One should make a mental note of whether the ICCs are on free drainage or on suction. The content of these drains could be informative, especially if one notices blood or chyle.
A CVVHDF or SLEDD process may be in progress. The savvy candidate may wish to ask the following questions:
The patient you are examining may have some sort of extra gadget hooked up. If ECMO is in progress, one may wish to ask about the following parameters:
If IABP counterpulsation is in progress, it raises additional questions. One may wish to ask the examiners whether one may be able to switch it to 1:2, to assess the efficacy of augmentation.
This stage is critically important. The drug and fluid infusions which are currently in progress give a clue as to what problem is currently being addressed. One should not neglect the labelled bags; the choice of antibiotics gives one some idea of where the source of sepsis is thought to be.
One should observe the following features of an EVD:
MARS machinery or plasmapheresis equipment may be present; there may be a continuous EEG monitor, or a cooling blanket (in the post-arrest scenario).
Ideally, one should get the patient sitting up to 30-45°. This may not be possible. However, one should still ask for it.
Ideally, the patient should be exposed from the waist up. The candidate can then stand back and look for anything externally obvious:
Performing the GCS should be the first step, unless you notice that a neuromuscular junction blocker is among the infusions. The level of consciousness then determines how you go about examining the rest of the patient.
A traditionalist, who is examining Mr Bloggs, would approach the GCS in the following manner:
One has just performed a GCS assessment; one is still holding the hands.
Now, time to look at them more closely.
First, one should spent a second assessing whether they are warm or cold.
Look for characteristic nail signs.
In brief, the nail signs one could look for are as follows:
Clubbing Leukonychia
Nail lines:
|
Onycholysis Koilonychia Splinter haemorrhages Nicotine stains Vertical nail ridges Horisontal nail ridges |
Also, one may look for hand signs:
Assess the pulse. Compare the radial pulses.
Cubital fossa
Examine the cubital fossa for
One should then palpate the axillary lymph nodes.
Palpate the neck:
Cranial nerve examination in MOSF may not yield many useful findings in terms of diagnosis. However, one may discover that underneath the crashing organ systems is a patient with a severe stroke. This will influence management.
Thus, at least a brief cranial nerve examination is expected.
Ask the examiners to dim the room lights.
Open both eyes. Each eye is exposed to light. The opposite pupil should constrict consensually.
This tests CN II (afferent) and CN III (efferent).
The cornea (not the sclera) is touched lightly with a moistened corner of a piece of gauze.
A normal reflex is to blink.
This tests CN V (afferent) and CN VII (efferent)
The conscious patient will be able to follow the tip of the candidate's finger.
The pattern of movements should be tracing the six cardinal points: superior left, inferior left, superior center, inferior center, superior right, inferior right.
This tests CNs III, IV and VI.
Typically, this is performed by putting some pressure on the superior orbital notch.
The patient should either open their eyes or localise.
This tests CN V.
The conscious patient will be able to perform a series of grimaces to assess the bilateral motor control of facial muscles:
The Yankeur sucker is used to probe the posterior pharynx, on both sides. A gag reaction should result from this.
This collectively tests CN X and IX.
While on the subject of CN X, one may test the cough reflex by suctioning the trachea.
This tests CN X.
This is also a convenient time to ask about the volume and character of the secretions.
The conscious patient is asked to protrude their tongue, and move it from side to side.
This tests CN XII.
The uvula deviates away from the lesion.
This tests CN X and IX.
The conscious patient is asked to shrug their shoulders against resistance.
This tests CN XI.
The ETT should be briefly addressed. One should ask for how long the patient has been intubated.
Palpation:
One puts both their hands on the chest to assess the symmetry of chest expansion.
Percussion:
One might wish to percuss the chest.
Changes in percussion resonance may be worth commenting on.
Auscultation:
One may begin by auscultating the apices anteriorly. Then, one should auscultate as posteriorly as possible. The money is in the bases.
Palpation:
The clever candidate will make a big show of palpating both the apex and the right sternal edge.
Auscultation:
One should auscultate in the following sequence:
The various clicks and murmurs one encounters are discussed elsewhere.
For this, one should ask to lay the patient flat.
Abdominal observation
Abdominal palpation
Abdominal percussion
Abdominal auscultation
The pelvic content would have been palpated during the abdominal examination.
The more important part of this examination is the groin.
At this stage, the patient should be re-draped - cover them from the waist up, and uncover their legs.
Observation and palpation of the pelvis:
Examination of the lines
Examination of the genitals and rectum
Once one is finished with the pelvis, one should cover it again, so that only the legs are sticking out.
One should ask to remove TEDs and compression stockings.
Leg muscle tone
The best way to test muscle tone is by holding the knee. Roll the knee gently to distract the patient; then try to lift it off the bed. In the presence of increased tone, the leg will remain straight and the whole thing will lift up; with normal or decreased tone, only the knee will bend
Calf tenderness
In the conscious patient, one might be able to assess whether a gentle calf squeeze produces the characteristic pain which suggests a DVT may be present.
This brings one to the feet, and to the beginning of the neurological examination.
The feet would have already been palpated to assess their temperature, and to look for pitting oedema.
Observation of the feet
One should look specifically for changes suggestive of chronic diabetic foot disease, or chronically poor vascular supply.
Palpation of the feet
This should consist of palpating the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulse.
Babinsky reflex
One should test the Babinsky bilaterally.
Clonus
One should attempt to assess clonus in both feet.
Now is the time to properly start the neurological examination of this patient.
Power of the muscle groups may be tested in the following sequence:
A detailed neurological examination may not be called for.
Ask to see the obs chart. If it is not allowed, ask for the following:
One may also wish do demonstrate an interest in the trends of any sort of advanced haemodynamic monitoring, eg. cardiac index as measured by PAC or PiCCO
One needs to show an interest in the following labs:
In short, one wants to see whether there is any organ system improvement; or whether the patient is in a spiral of decline.
One should always ask for the following:
You sometimes want to see the following:
"Mr Bloggs is suffering from multi-organ system failure. [insert clever diagnosis here]."
"The involved systems include [list of systems]"
"I have come to this conclusion on the basis of the following findings: [insert clinical findings here]"
"It is possible that this syndrome is the consequence of [single unifying aetiology]"
"I would like to confirm my diagnosis with the following investigations: [insert appropriate investigations]"
"The current management issues are as follows: [a brief list of management priorities]"
"I would approach the management of these issues in the following manner: [list of management strategies; it helps to organise this into an A,B,C,D,E approach if one has a complex multisystem problem to manage]"
"The prognosis is poor, and I would like to engage the family in a discussion".
OR
"The organ system recovery is satisfactory, and I would like to further optimise supportive care by [improving nutrition, weaning from ventilation, physiotherapy, cessation of sedation and corticosteroids, etc]"
"Mr Bloggs is suffering from multi-organ system failure. [insert clever diagnosis here]."
"The involved systems include [list of systems]"
"I have come to this conclusion on the basis of the following findings: [insert clinical findings here]"
”This is a complex case and I am unable to associate these features with a single aetiology on the basis of my findings alone."
"The possible aetiologies responsible for this presentation could include [list of differentials]"
"In order to discriminate between these differentials, I would like to perform the following investigations: [list of investigations]"
"Furthermore, I would like to enlist the help of the following specialties [insert list of consults], for whom I will have the following specific requests/questions: [what questions will you ask these specialist teams]"
Number of previous hot cases in this topic: 20
Unspecified hospital in Adelaide |
35-year-old female, three weeks in ICU post re-do MVR with peri-operative multi-organ failure, complicated post-operative course and slow ventilatory wean. Background included ESRF on dialysis. Findings on examination included tracheostomy, high sputum load, old ICC site, small tidal volumes on moderate level of pressure support ventilation, low vasopressor requirement, prosthetic heart valve, signs of right heart failure, general deconditioning and global weakness, presence of AV fistula in left forearm, and evidence of melaena in faecal management system. Candidates were directed to identify the major issues with a plan for their management. Discussion points included causes of failure to progress. |
Unspecified hospital in Sydney |
|
Westmead Hospital |
|
Liverpool Hospital |
|
Flinders Medical Centre |
|
St Vincent’s Hospital |
|
Prince Charles Hospital |
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital |
|
Prince of Wales Hospital |
|
Westmead Hospital |
|
Westmead Hospital |
|
Flinders Medical Centre |
|
Flinders Medical Centre |
a) Slow respiratory wean b) Ongoing tracheostomy bleed c) CVVHDF for ARF d) MODS e) Evidence of intravascular hemolysis |
Flinders Medical Centre |
|
Alfred Hospital |
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital |
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital |
|
Prince of Wales Hospital |
|
Unspecified hospital |
|
Unspecified hospital |
|