Critically analyse two commonly used techniques for the measurement of cardiac output.
Commonly used* techniques to measure cardiac output are few. Many techniques can be used,
these include: intermittent thermodilution (inject cold fluid•), "continuous" thermodilution
(heated*), use of doppler ( echocardiograhic probes• : transthoracic, trans-oesophageal. suprasternal,
oesophageal), transthoracic bioimpedance•, and calculated using the Fick equation• (intermittent
mixed venous oxygen, continuous SVO2 catheter), and variations on arterial waveform analysis.
Appropriate critical analysis will include balances between advantages and disadvantages
(mcluding invasiveness, insertion, limitations, misinterpretation, other data obtained etc.), and detail
of accuracy (bias and precision) as well as indicator of reproducibility ( eg .. coefficient of variation).
Again, a question which would be well suited to a tabulated answer.
Technique of cardiac output monitoring |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
PA catheter |
“Gold standard” of CO monitoring |
Risk of vascular access |
PiCCO |
Easy to insert |
Risk of vascular access |
Transthoracic Doppler |
Non-invasive |
Interpreter-dependent |
Oesophageal Doppler |
Minimally invasive |
Positional; risk of gastric or oesophageal perforation |
SvO2 measurments |
Easy to insert |
No information on regional oxygen extraction |
Pulse dye densitometry |
Interpreter-independent |
Difficult to perform |
Bioimpedance cardiography |
Non-invasive |
Thus far not validated for clinical use |
Mathews, Lailu, and Kalyan RK Singh. "Cardiac output monitoring." Annals of cardiac anaesthesia 11.1 (2008).
de Waal, Eric EC, Frank Wappler, and Wolfgang F. Buhre. "Cardiac output monitoring." Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 22.1 (2009): 71-77.
Pinsky, Michael R. "Hemodynamic evaluation and monitoring in the ICU."CHEST Journal 132.6 (2007): 2020-2029.