Describe the advantages and disadvantages of PaO2 (partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood) and SpO2 (oxygen saturation measured by a pulse oximeter) as indicators of arterial oxygenation.
This question lends itself to an answer in table form. Such a table should include the following type of information:
|
PaO2 |
SpO2 |
|
|
Advantages |
Allows calculation of P:Fratio and A-a gradient. Calculating SaO2 allows calculation of DO2/VO2/shunt fraction |
Also a reliable indicator of oxygenation particularly in the clinical relevant range |
|
Accurate indicator of oxygenation, not influenced by position of Oxyhaemoglobin Dissociation Curve |
Easy to use, non invasive, reliable in most clinical situations both in ICU and on the wards |
|
|
Measurement accurate evenin the presence of dyshaemoglobins. |
Provides a continuous measurement |
|
|
Disadvantages |
Invasive |
Affected by peripheral perfusion, arrhythmias, motion artefact |
|
Prone to pre-analytic errors – air bubbles, heparin contamination |
Affected by dyshemoglobins |
|
|
Needs a blood gas analyser |
||
|
Usually a time delay between sampling and result |
||
|
Provides only intermittent measurements |
An alternative tabulated answer would resemble the following:
|
PaO2 |
SpO2 |
|
|
Advantages |
|
|
|
Disadvantages |
|
|
Hutton, P., and T. Clutton-Brock. "The benefits and pitfalls of pulse oximetry."BMJ: British Medical Journal 307.6902 (1993): 457.