Outline the advantages and disadvantages of the methods that enable speech in a patient with a tracheostomy tube in situ.
Not available.
This has appeared before, as Question 17 from the first paper of 2017.
Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Cuff up, fenestrated tube: |
|
|
Cuff down, speaking valve: Gas only exits through the upper airway during exhalation (one way valve) |
|
|
Cuff down, no speaking valve i.e. gas freely exists via both the tracheostomy and the upper airway |
|
|
Cuff down, finger occlusion - i.e. the patient blocks the tracheostomy and exhales using the upper airway instead |
|
|
The author has also been present at attempts to facilitate speech by attaching low flow wall oxygen to the above-cuff suction port of the tracheostomy, thereby directing a flow of gas up into the mouth through the vocal cords. The first time you do this, you should expect to have a Yankeur sucker ready, as god-awful filth will rise bubbling from the nethermost hell of that long term patient's airway, forced out by the gas pressure. The author was subsequently surprised to discover that this was not a Mad Hatter sign of senior intensivist cognitive deterioration, but in fact a described technique (McGrath et al, 2016). It was left out of the table above mainly because most people would agree that it does not form a part of the normal spectrum of practice.
Hess, Dean R. "Facilitating speech in the patient with a tracheostomy."Respiratory care 50.4 (2005): 519-525.
Morris, Linda L., et al. "Restoring speech to tracheostomy patients." Critical care nurse 35.6 (2015): 13-28.
McGrath, Brendan, et al. "Above cuff vocalisation: a novel technique for communication in the ventilator-dependent tracheostomy patient." Journal of the Intensive Care Society 17.1 (2016): 19-26.