You are asked to review a 32-year-old patient who has acutely deteriorated, 3 hours post normal vaginal delivery after a prolonged labour.
She is 40+4 weeks gestation with an uncomplicated pregnancy and no known past medical history.
On examination her peripheral oxygen saturations are 78% on a 15L/min non-rebreather mask oxygen, respiratory rate of 32 breaths/min and blood pressure 80/46 mmHg.
a) List the six most likely differential diagnoses for her deterioration. (3 marks)
b) For each listed differential diagnosis, outline the clinical findings and the relevant investigations that would support the diagnosis. You may tabulate your answer. (7 marks)
Syllabus topic/section:
2.1.12 Obstetric Intensive Care / Special considerations when managing the obstetric patient: L1
2.1.12 Obstetric Intensive Care / Amniotic fluid embolism: L1
2.1.5 Respiratory Intensive Care / Pulmonary embolism: L1
Discussion:
This was a core intensive care topic where some candidates achieved the standard required to a very high degree. Answers were rewarded for demonstrating depth of understanding of assessment for a differential diagnosis. Many candidates could have improved marks by articulating helpful Echo and CXR findings which are highly discriminatory investigations.
Precise terminology gained marks, for example, describing echo findings such as LVEF parameters for peripartum cardiomyopathy, as well as typical patterns on ECGs for amniotic fluid/ pulmonary embolism. Some answers were clearly rushed; candidates are reminded to proportion their time wisely.
a) Six most likely differentials? for a postpartum patient immediately following delivery?
Other possibilities, some of which offer only patchy coverage of the clinical features from the stem, could include:
b):
What if you didn't tabulate your answers? Surely that would still make it possible to "achieve the standard required to a very high degree." Especially if you listed the ECG changes associated with AFE and PE. How much to write, of course, becomes the limiting factor, if one does in fact possess all the detailed knowledge required. The suggestion that specific LVEF parameters may need to be quoted to score maximum marks may seem somewhat farfetched, but in fact there is historical precedent for this: Question 28 from the first paper of 2017 asked specifically for diagnostic criteria of peripartum cardiomyopathy. In case everyone forgot, those were LV ejection fraction < 45% and/or fractional shortening < 30%. But there are seven marks and six differentials to cover, which means writing, on average, no more than 23 words on each. What follows is a crazed attempt to fit within this limited wordcount:
Sliwa, Karen, et al. "Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy." European journal of heart failure 12.8 (2010): 767-778.
Moore, Jason, and Marie R. Baldisseri. "Amniotic fluid embolism." Critical care medicine 33.10 (2005): S279-S285.
Fujitani, Shigeki, and Marie R. Baldisseri. "Hemodynamic assessment in a pregnant and peripartum patient." Critical care medicine 33.10 (2005): S354-S361.