Question 15

College Answer

There was a good understanding of the definitions of compliance but many candidates failed 
to clearly demonstrate an understanding of the difference between static and dynamic 
compliance. Many candidates had little knowledge of how compliance is measured. It was 
expected that descriptions of methods to measure static and dynamic compliance would be 
provided. There were frequent errors in descriptions that were provided. 

Discussion

What is lung compliance?

• Respiratory compliance is defined as the change in lung volume per unit change in transmural pressure gradient. It is usually about 100ml/cm H₂O.
• Static compliance is defined as the change in lung volume per unit change in pressure in the absence of flow. It is composed of:
  • Chest wall compliance (usually 200ml/cm H₂O.
  • Lung tissue compliance (also usually cm H₂O.)
• Dynamic compliance is defined as the change in volume divided by change in pressure, measured during normal breathing, between points of apparent zero flow at the beginning and end of inspiration. Its components are:
  • Chest wall compliance
  • Lung tissue compliance
  • Airway resistance (which makes it frequency-dependent)
• Specific compliance is compliance that is normalized by a lung volume, usually FRC. It is used to compare compliance between lungs of different volumes (eg. child and adult)

How is lung compliance measured?

• Supersyringe method:
  • Static compliance is measured by inflating the lung in volume increments, usually 100ml
  • Time  (~23-3 seconds) is allowed for gas pressure to equilibrate between units with different time constants
  • This is the gold standard for measuring static compliance
  • The disadvantage is the time it takes to perform (minutes) and the need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator
• Constant flow method:
  • A low inspiratory flow (as low as 1.7L/min) is administered over 10-15 seconds
  • A low expiratory flow is then controlled to observe the expiratory pressure change
  • Because the flow is low, airway resistance is said to contribute minimally
  • This method has a tendency to underestimate inspiratory compliance and overestimate expiratory compliance
  • The advantage is that one does not need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator
• Multiple occlusions methods
  • During normal ventilator function, breath occlusions are repeated at different volumes, with normal breaths in between.
  • The advantage is that there is no need to discontinue normal ventilation, and that the process can easily be automated.
• Limitations of all methods of measuring static compliance:
  • All methods usually require the patient to be sedated and paralysed
  • There is the possible escape of gas into the pulmonary circulation, which gradually decreases the lung volume during measurement
  • Changes in gas pressure associated with increased humidity and temperature are ignored
• Measurement of dynamic compliance
  • Occurs during normal ventilator function, and makes no attempt to correct for pressure produced by airway resistance
  • Usually automated and integrated into modern ventilator function

Harris, R. Scott. "Pressure-volume curves of the respiratory system." Respiratory care 50.1 (2005): 78-99.

Mead, Jere, and James L. Whittenberger. "Physical properties of human lungs measured during spontaneous respiration." Journal of Applied Physiology 5.12 (1953): 779-796.

Lutfi, Mohamed Faisal. "The physiological basis and clinical significance of lung volume measurements." Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine 12.1 (2017): 3.

Rahn, Hermann, et al. "The pressure-volume diagram of the thorax and lung." American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 146.2 (1946): 161-178.

Bunta, Emil. "The Relation of Intrapleural Pressure and Pulmonary Collapse in Artificial Pneumothorax." American Review of Tuberculosis 33.2 (1936): 203-214.

Hurtado, Alberto, et al. "Studies of total pulmonary capacity and its Sub-divisions. Vi. Observations on cases of obstructive pulmonary emphysema." The Journal of clinical investigation13.6 (1934): 1027-1051.

Morgan, Thomas E. "Pulmonary surfactant." New England Journal of Medicine 284.21 (1971): 1185-1193.

von Neergaard, Kurt. "Neue Auffassungen uber einen Grundbegriff der Atemmehanik: die Retraktionskraft der Lunge, abhagig von der Oberflachenspannung in den Alveolen." Z. Gesamte Exp. Med. 66 (1929): 373-394.

Radford Jr, E. P. "Static mechanical properties of mammalian lungs." Handbook of physiology 1 (1964): 429-449.

Lachmann, B., B. Robertson, and J. Vogel. "In vivo lung lavage as an experimental model of the respiratory distress syndrome." Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 24.3 (1980): 231-236.

Escolar Castellón, J. de D. "Lung histeresis: a morphological view." Histology and histopathology (2004).

Guyatt, A. R., et al. "Reproducibility of dynamic compliance and flow-volume curves in normal man." Journal of applied physiology 39.3 (1975): 341-348.

Katsoulis, K. Konstantinos, Konstantinos Kostikas, and Theodore Kontakiotis. "Techniques for assessing small airways function: Possible applications in asthma and COPD." Respiratory medicine 119 (2016): e2-e9.

Kannangara, Oliver, Jennifer L. Dickson, and J. Geoffrey Chase. "Specific compliance: is it truly independent of lung volume?." IFAC-PapersOnLine 51.27 (2018): 299-304.