Describe the relationship between muscle length and tension (50% of marks).
Outline the physiologic significance of this relationship in cardiac muscle (50% of marks).
Some detail was expected on a general description that tension is variable with the length of muscle. It was expected answers would describe that there is a resting length at which tension developed on stimulation is maximal. Many candidates omitted that differences exist between muscle types with smooth muscle behaving differently. Additional credit was given for the distinction about active tension vs resting tension. It was expected a description of the potential mechanism would be included with discussion of sliding filament theory, overlapping fibres and optimal sarcomere length. Some candidates utilised a diagram effectively to convey understanding and more detail was rewarded with additional marks.
The second half of the question involved describing how this relationship is particularly important in cardiac muscle and underpins the Frank Starling relationship and all the cardiac physiology that follows. Initial length of fibres is determined by the diastolic filling of the heart, so pressure developed is proportionate to the total tension developed. The developed tension increases as diastolic volume increases to a maximum (the concept of Heterometric regulation). Better answers appreciated that the physiology may be different for a while heart rather than isolated muscle fibres
Nishikawa, Kiisa C., Jenna A. Monroy, and Uzma Tahir. "Muscle function from organisms to molecules." Integrative and comparative biology 58.2 (2018): 194-206.
Allen, David G., and Jonathan C. Kentish. "The cellular basis of the length-tension relation in cardiac muscle." Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 17.9 (1985): 821-840.
Fridén, Jan, and Richard L. Lieber. "Evidence for muscle attachment at relatively long lengths in tendon transfer surgery." The Journal of hand surgery 23.1 (1998): 105-110.
Ter Keurs, H. E., T. Iwazumi, and G. H. Pollack. "The sarcomere length-tension relation in skeletal muscle." The Journal of General Physiology 72.4 (1978): 565-592.
Rockenfeller, R., and M. Günther. "How to model a muscle’s active force–length relation: A comparative study." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 313 (2017): 321-336.
Gordon, A. M., Andrew F. Huxley, and F. J. Julian. "The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres." The Journal of physiology 184.1 (1966): 170-192.
Huxley, Hl E. "Electron microscope studies on the structure of natural and synthetic protein filaments from striated muscle." Journal of molecular biology 7.3 (1963): 281-IN30.
Herzog, W., V. Joumaa, and T. R. Leonard. "The force–length relationship of mechanically isolated sarcomeres." Muscle biophysics. Springer, New York, NY, 2010. 141-161.
Johns, Michael M., et al. "Length-tension relationship of the feline thyroarytenoid muscle." Journal of Voice 18.3 (2004): 285-291.
Winters, Taylor M. Determinants of active and passive tension in skeletal muscle. University of California, San Diego, 2012.
Spiro, David, and E. H. Sonnenblick. "Comparison of the ultrastructural basis of the contractile process in heart and skeletal muscle." Circulation research 15 (1964): 14-37.
Gordon, Allen R., and MARION J. Siegman. "Mechanical properties of smooth muscle. I. Length-tension and force-velocity relations." American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 221.5 (1971): 1243-1249.
Herlihy, Jeremiah T., and Richard A. Murphy. "Length-tension relationship of smooth muscle of the hog carotid artery." Circulation research 33.3 (1973): 275-283.