This chapter is relevant to Section G1(i) of the 2023 CICM Primary Syllabus, which asks the exam candidate to "describe the anatomy of the heart including the chambers, valves, pericardium, and the orientation of the heart". Prior to the disastrous Question 2 from the second paper of 2023, nothing else in the CICM First Part Exam has ever asked for this, except perhaps a fraction of Question 16 from the second paper of 2019. There, the college wanted us to "compare the structure, function and coronary circulation of the right and left ventricles", where the structure component would have been satisfied by "a simple anatomical description". From the examiner's inattention, one might have come to the conclusion that the college does not expect their early trainees to become masters of the cardiac anatomy. Still, it should not have been so surprising that at some random stage in the future they would have asked for this in some detail, considering that this is what happened with the trachea and bronchi. And indeed "outline the anatomy of the cardiac ventricles including the chambers, valves and conduction elements" eventually came up in the second sitting of 2023, with a pass rate of 11%. The examiners, in their comments, provided the following suggested structure:
This structure is therefore canonical and will be used below, as much as possible. Given the nature of the answers expected for that question, Last's was the natural reference point, as it gives its information in the same structure as the college answer (i.e. that's where they probably copied their marking rubric from). For the pedant, the author was using an old dog-eared ninth edition, where the relevant details can be found on page 265. Also, for the person who has no Lasts of any vintage, an excellent article by Weinhaus & Robers (2005) is somehow available for free. There is of course a lot more detail to cardiac anatomy, but because of the self-imposed limitations of this chapter (keep it simple, keep it text), a lot of the more interesting material had to be exiled to other pages.
It is at this stage of a textbook chapter that the reader is usually confronted with various cutaway diagrams of the heart, lovingly sketched by artists from the early twentieth century as they sat in prosection labs, choking on formaldehyde fumes. Lovely though they are, the relevance of this practice among publishers is puzzling, particularly where it comes to exam practice. The CICM trainees usually do not have the time or the patience to reproduce those diagrams in the rush of writing their answers. As such, they will usually offer a written description. Moreover, from a purely practical standpoint, it must be acknowledged that most of them will never see or handle their patient's heart in the course of their normal sane behaviour. Ergo, the most exam-centric thing one can offer here is a textual description of cardiac anatomy, designed for easy regurgitation.
If one had to produce a one-sentence description of what the heart is for some sort of introductory statement, one could do worse than Last's, where it is described as "the muscular pump responsible for blood circulation".
Position
To merely say "it's in the middle of the chest" would probably not be enough to score marks. The specific landmarks have not been asked for in any past papers but they may appear one day in some sort of procedure viva, as the tendency there would be to ask for the anatomical landmarks used for pericardiocentesis (for example).
Orientation
Basic structural anatomy
Internal ventricular structures
Valvular structures
Conductive elements
Blood supply
Venous drainage
Lymphatic drainage
Nerve supply
Now, finally, to answer the structure element of Question 16 from the second paper of 2019, which called for an anatomical comparison between the left and right ventricle. Yes, one must confess thinking about it, there must surely be some relevance to testing this knowledge, as it comes in handy when you embark on the mandatory TTE training which is now a part of the curriculum. It initially seemed logical to put the RV column on the right and LV on the left, but it somehow felt inexplicably wrong.
| Domain | Right ventricle | Left ventricle |
| Shape | Irregular; vaguely triangular | Conical |
| Valves | Tricuspid and pulmonic | Mitral and aortic |
| Thickness | Relatively thin: 2-5mm | Three times thicker: 7-11mm |
| Mass | ~ 26g | ~90g |
| Position in the chest | Right and anterior | Left and posterior |
| Blood supply | RCA and circumflex | LAD and circumflex |
This is not a structure which the examiners have thus far concerned themselves, which is fair, because even though it appears in the syllabus, one can virtually guarantee that the exam candidates will not have spent any time reading about it. At a risk of distracting them from more valuable revision topics, the reader is motioned towards Rodriguez & Tan (2017) whose description of this otherwise boring sack is well-supplied with signposts to features of clinical relevance.
This structure is usually described as "flask-shaped" or "conical", where the apex of the cone is in the same position as the apex of the heart.
Structure: this is a sandwich of two layers, the outer fibrosa and the inner serosa. Inside, between serosa and epicardium, one finds some serous fluid of nonspecific character, a thin ultrafiltrate of plasma. The thickness of both layers together is between 1 and 2mm,
Function: Through several resources it appears that most authors attribute to the pericardium the role of stabilising the heart inside the chest, presumably because otherwise it would bounce around randomly, batted about by the lungs like a piece of fluff in the possession of a kitten. This is obviously insane, as patients undergoing total pericardiectomy do not experience this. But everybody who discusses the anatomy of this structure seems to quote Holt (1970), and Joseph P. Holt opened his article by stating that the pericardium:
"...holds the heart in a fixed geometric position and isolates the heart from other structures in the thorax, thus preventing adhesions and spread of infection."
It has at least seven other roles according to Holt, among which are:
And in the same paper, Holt quotes Moore & Shumacker (1953), who after reviewing cases of congenital and experimentally absent pericardium concluded that it "serves no vital function and that it can be safely sacrificed".
Position: without repeating what has already been said about the heart's position in the chest, one could focus on the position of the pericardium in relation to the heart itself, and the other structures. The inner layer is continuous over the entire surface of the heart and extends all the way to the roots of the greater vessels. It also also covers the anterior and lateral sides of the venae cavae and the anterior part of the pulmonary veins. The outer fibrosa is connected to the adventitia of the greater vessels and to the central tendon of the diaphragm (the pericardiophrenic ligaments). It is also attached to the sternum, over the surface between the manubrium and the sternum. The posterior edges are in contact with the main bronchi.
Blood supply: branches of the internal thoracic artery and the descending thoracic aorta; venous drainage into the brachiocephalic veins.
Lymphatic drainage: there is no single route and the pericardium drains in all directions, including the epicardial lymphatics of the heart, peribronchial nodes and the mediastinal pleura.
Innervation:
This innervation pattern can give pericardial pain a diaphragm-like pattern of referral, with shoulder tip pain predominating. A classical description of this comes from an ancient paper by Capps (1927) who reported on his experiences of tapping effusions and then scratching around inside the cavity with a silver wire, to much complaint form his patients.
Right coronary artery:
Left main:
Left anterior descending:
Left circumflex:
The process of grinding painfully though medical school would have inevitably furnished the reader with at least one anatomy textbook, and they are referred to whatever copy they already own, as none of them is superior to the others for this specific area.
Loukas, Marios, et al. "History of cardiac anatomy: a comprehensive review from the Egyptians to today." Clinical Anatomy 29.3 (2016): 270-284.
LE WALD, LEON T. "The Relation of the Heart, Pericardium and the Heart Valves to the Anterior Chest Wall." Archives of Surgery 6.1_PART_I (1923): 89-100.
Weinhaus, Anthony J., and Kenneth P. Roberts. "Anatomy of the human heart." Handbook of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and devices. Humana Press, 2005. 51-79.
Rodriguez, E. Rene, and Carmela D. Tan. "Structure and anatomy of the human pericardium." Progress in cardiovascular diseases 59.4 (2017): 327-340.
Holt, Joseph P. "The normal pericardium." The American journal of cardiology 26.5 (1970): 455-465.
Moore, Thomas C., and Harris B. Shumacker JR. "Congenital and experimentally produced pericardial defects." Angiology 4.1 (1953): 1-11.
Capps, Joseph A. "Pericardial Pain: An Experimental and Clinical Study." Archives of Internal Medicine 40.5 (1927): 715-725.