This chapter is relevant to Section Q2(i) of the 2023 CICM Primary Syllabus, which expects the exam candidates to "understanding of the pharmacology of anti-coagulants, anti-platelet drugs, thrombolytic drugs and anti-fibrinolytic drugs". Heparin is a staple of ICU anticoagulation, and one would do well to become very familiar with its properties, for various pragmatic reasons but also because it appears in several historical exam papers:
As you can see, it's all heparin vs. enoxaparin, except for that one question involving hirudin (hirudin!) which barely anybody passed. As such, it seemed logical to present the summary as a big table comparing these two drugs to one another.
| Name | Heparin | Enoxaparin |
| Class | Parenteral anticoagulant | Parenteral anticoagulant |
| Chemistry | Glycosaminoglycan | Glycosaminoglycan |
| Routes of administration | IV ands subcut | IV ands subcut |
| Absorption | Minimal oral bioavailability (~ 1%) | Minimal oral bioavailability (~ 1%) |
| Solubility | pKa -2.0 to -4.0, excellent solubility in water | pKa -2.8, excellent solubility in water |
| Distribution | Highly protein-bound, mainy to lipoproteins (LDL) | VOD=0.05L/kg, basically confined to the bloodstream. Somewhat protein-bound, but less than unfractionated heparin (only the chains which are more than 6000 Da are protein-bound) |
| Target receptor | Antithrombin III | Antithrombin III |
| Metabolism | Sequestered into reticuloendothelial cells and degraded gradually into inactive and renally cleared metabolites. | Mainly metabolized by the liver via desulfation and depolymerization to lower molecular weight fragments, which end up being either less potent or totally inactive |
| Elimination |
Biphasic (saturable) metabolism: with low doses, a rapid saturable clearance (by reticuloendothelial tissues), which becomes slower with high doses when this system is saturated. Monitored by APTT, which incorporates an assessment of thrombin activity. Reversal is using protamine, 1mg binds 100 units of heparin |
About 40% of active and inactive fragments combined are excreted renally, which is why low molecular weight heparin is not especially well suited to renal failure patients. Reversal |
| Time course of action | Half-life of 25 units per Kg = 30 minutes Half-life of 100 units per Kg = 60 minutes Half-life of 400 units per Kg = 150 minutes |
Half life is about 4-7 hours. |
| Mechanism of action | By binding to antithrombin III and causing the active site to undergo a conformational change, heparin increases its availability to its normal ligands, including factor Xa and thrombin. The result is an increase in the activity of antithrombin, which manifests in the form of the anticoagulant effect | By binding to antithrombin III and causing the active site to undergo a conformational change, low molecular weight heparin increases its affinity for factor Xa (but not thrombin). The result is an increase in the activity of antithrombin on Factor Xa, which manifests in the form of the anticoagulant effect. |
| Clinical effects | Anticoagulation, bleeding, the possibility of HITS. Also osteopenia, mineralocorticoid deficiency alopecia and LFT derangement |
Anticoagulation is the only clinically apparent effect; no significant side effects apart from the possibility of HITS (which is much smaller than with UFH) |
| Single best reference for further information | TGA PI document | TGA PI document |
Merli & Groce (2010) seem like a perfect reference to recommend because their article is exactly a comparison of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin.
Heparin is a heterogeneous mixture of mucopolysaccharides, termed glycosaminoglycans. It is essentially a polymerised disaccharide, a starch. Each repeated disaccharide is variably sulfated. Here's an image ripped off directly from Wikipedia:
Because the disaccharide polymers are of varying lengths, heparin has an average molecular weight of 3 to 30 kDa. Unless it is fractionated, in which case you can control to only have the low molecular weight version. Its polymer length is really very very random, mainly because heparin is an animal product (the first heparin was in fact derived from canine liver cells in 1916, by a second-year medical student) and animals are largely disinterested in quality control of industrial chemistry. The heparin in your hospital is derived from bovine lung or porcine gut, and we are occasionally offered a helpful reminder of this each time there is a swine flu outbreak among the pigs of China.
The chemical relatives of heparin would have to include all the fractionated heparins (eg. enoxaparin), as well as a some of the alternatives, into which one must go if one is (for example) having to systemically anticoagulate a patient who is heparin-intolerant. These will be mentioned here in some minimal detal.
Naturally occurring mucopolysaccharides (MPS) of mammals include the chondroitin sulphates, hyaluronic acid, heparitin sulphate, keratosulphate, chondroitin, and heparin. As mentioned above, heparin is already getting scraped out of pig intestines and purified for human use. The other heparin-like substances are also available on the market as a blended mixture known as danaparoid. Danaparoid has roughly the same molecular weight as dalteparin (about 6000 Da) and is therefore considered as one of the low molecular weight heparins.
Enoxaparin, dalterparin and fondaparinux are grouped as "low molecular weight heparins" because their oligosaccharide chains are shorter than heparin. They are produced from heparin by "fractionation", which actually means a different thing depending on which drug you are looking at, and mainly means "reduction in size" rather than implying some sort of fractionation column. Still, this is why the normal version of heparin is referred to as "unfractionated", as it has not undergone this process. Dalteparin is about 6,000 Da and enoxaparin is about 4500 Da on average (Merli & Groce, 2010) Fondaparinux is an even smaller molecule (1500 Da), completely synthetic (i.e. not reliant on the fickle Chinese pork industry) and does not produce a risk of HITS as it has no affinity for PF4.
Hirudin was the one required by the college in Question 4 from the second paper of 2011. That's the main ingredient of leech saliva, a 65 amino acid polypeptide secreted by Hirudo medicinalis, and leeches remain the only source of this substance (though it does not appear to be available on the Australian market). Because the process of pureeing hundreds of leeches was laborious and distasteful, a recombinant option (lepirudin) was ultimately developed in 1997, which differs from the natural product by its lack of one out of three sulfate bridges. As the result, its affinity for thrombin is lower (Greinacher et a, 1991). Bivalirudin, a much shorter peptide analog (20 amino acids), is also available.
One unit of heparin is the quantity required to keep 1ml of cats blood liquid for 24 hrs at 0 degrees Celsius. This unusually animal-unfriendly definition comes from one WH Howell, who left some cats blood overnight in the refrigerator. It didn't clot - it half-clotted- but it remained liquid all the same. These days the International Heparin Standard uses sheep plasma, presumably because sheep are easier to capture and exsanguinate.
Heparin is typically given intravenously, or subcutaneously (wherefrom it gradually dissociates). The subcutaneous route of administration takes 1-2 hrs to reach peak effect. Thereafter, its volume of distribution is 40-70ml/kg, essentially confined to the intravascular volume. Being a huge molecule, unfractionated heparin does not penetrate the placenta, which makes it especially useful in pregnancy.
Oral heparin has very poor bioavailability. It is too large a molecule, and its charge is too negative to be absorbed easily. Brave men have tried cooking with heparin to make it more orally bioavailable. Additionally, 45 volunteers drank 20,000 units of heparin and then allowed their APTT to be tested - turns out it increases by 2.3 seconds on average, which is not much, but which demonstrates that there is some absorption. The authors did not mention anything about the taste. Similarly, low molecular weight heparins have minimal oral bioavailability.
| Name | Bioavailability |
pKa and water solubility |
| Heparin | Minimal oral bioavailability (~ 1%) | pKa -2.0 to -4.0, excellent solubility in water |
| Enoxaparin | Minimal oral bioavailability (~ 1%) | pKa -2.8, excellent solubility in water |
| Dalteparin | Minimal oral bioavailability (~ 1%) | pKa -2.6, excellent solubility in water |
| Fondaparinux | Oral bioavailability up to 20%, but only when administered as lipid nanocapsules | pKa -3.0, excellent solubility in water |
| Danaparoid | Oral bioavailability is minimal, less than 1%. | pKa 3.0; good water solubility |
| Hirudin | Oral bioavailability 10% | pKa 7.1-9.2; good water solubility |
| Lepirudin | Oral bioavailability 10% | pKa 4.4; good water solubility |
| Bivalirudin | Minimal oral bioavailability; poorly absorbed | pKa 2.78, reasonable water solubility |
| Argatroban | Oral bioavailability is minimal, less than 1%. | pKa 13.4 (thus, minimal oral absorption); |
The chemical relatives of heparin are all generally parenteral agents. For example, direct thrombin inhibitor polypeptides like hirudin and lepirudin have modest oral bioavailability, probably because they are massive peptides and get destroyed by intestinal peptidases on their way through the gut (Cen et al, 2006).
In the circulation, the heparin drugs are highly protein bound, mainly to lipoprotein (unfractionated heparin seems to especially enjoy LDL). The same is the case for enoxaparin and dalteparin, though apparently to a much lesser extent, as the bulk of their molecules are less than 6000 Daltons. Because of this predilection for plasma protein binding, as well as their relatively large size, these substances have a very small volume of distribution, i.e they are basically confined to the circulating blood volume.
| Heparin |
VOD= 0.1L/kg, highly protein-bound, mainy to lipoproteins (LDL) |
| Enoxaparin | VOD=0.05L/kg, basically confined to the bloodstream. Somewhat protein-bound, but less than unfractionated heparin (only the chains which are more than 6000 Da are protein-bound) |
| Dalteparin | VOD=0.05L/kg, basically confined to the bloodstream. Somewhat protein-bound, but less than unfractionated heparin (only the chains which are more than 6000 Da are protein-bound) |
| Fondaparinux | VOD=0.2L/kg; does not bind to any plasma proteins |
| Danaparoid | VOD=0.1L/kg; minimal plasma protein binding |
| Hirudin | VOD=0.3L/kg; minimally protein bound (only to thrombin) |
| Lepirudin | VOD=0.3L/kg; minimally protein bound (only to thrombin) |
| Bivalirudin | VOD=0.1L/kg; minimally protein bound (only to thrombin) |
| Argatroban | VOD=0.2L/kg; 54% plasma protein bound |
The other heparin substitutes have similar properties, in the sense that most of them are confined to the circulating blood volume.
Unfractionated heparin enjoys a rapid saturable clearance at low doses, and a slow first-order clearance at higher doses. Thus, the half-life depends on the dose.
At low doses, due to binding to heparin-binding-proteins, macrophages and endothelial cells, heparin becomes sequestered and biologically useless, i.e. cleared for all intents and purposes. It is eventually degraded by depolymerization. To the observer, this looks like zero-order linear elimination.
At higher doses, some additional mechanisms take effect. After huge doses, a small amount is excreted in the urine, which probably represents the lower end of the molecular weight spectrum. Most likely the reticuloendothelial system plays a role in sequestering and destroying heparin. After Dawes and Pepper (1979) injected radiolabelled heparin into animals, the radioactivity is concentrated in the liver, spleen, bone marrow and lungs. Then something happens, and desulfated forms appear in the bloodstream, with basically unchanged molecular weight but absolutely none of the original antithrombin-binding activity. These zombie heparin molecules degrade gradually over hours, eventually turning into fragments small enough to be excreted renally.
| Name | Metabolism | Elimination and monitoring | Half-life |
| Heparin | Sequestered into reticuloendothelial cells and degraded gradually into inactive and renally cleared metabolites. | Biphasic (saturable) metabolism: with low doses, a rapid saturable clearance (by reticuloendothelial tissues), which becomes slower with high doses when this system is saturated. Monitored by APTT, which incorporates an assessment of thrombin activity | Half-life of 25 units per Kg = 30 minutes Half-life of 100 units per Kg = 60 minutes Half-life of 400 units per Kg = 150 minutes |
| Enoxaparin | Mainly metabolized by the liver via desulfation and depolymerization to lower molecular weight fragments, which end up being either less potent or totally inactive | About 40% of active and inactive fragments combined are excreted renally, which is why low molecular weight heparin is not especially well suited to renal failure patients. Monitoring is by measurement of anti-Xa activity |
Half life is about 4-7 hours. |
| Dalteparin | Small amount of dalteparin is metabolised into lower molecular weright framents, mainly in the liver | 70% of dalteparin is eliminated via the kidneys. Monitoring is by measurement of anti-Xa activity |
Half life is about 3-5 hours. |
| Fondaparinux | Undergoes minimal metabolism. | The majority of the administered dose is eliminated unchanged in urine in individuals with normal kidney function. Usually, no monitoring is required, but anti-Xa activity can be used (though it may overestimate the dose) |
Half-life is about 17-20 hours |
| Danaparoid | Minimally metabolised | 50% of danaparoid is eliminated via the kidneys. Monitoring is by measurement of anti-Xa activity |
Half-life is about 25 hours |
| Hirudin | Minimally metabolised; some hydrolysis in the liver occurs, whcih liberates [eptide fragments and amino acids | 90% of the drug is cleared renally. Monitored by APTT or ECT(ecarin time) |
Half life is about 0.8-1.7 hrs |
| Lepirudin | Minimally metabolised; some hydrolysis in the liver occurs, whcih liberates [eptide fragments and amino acids | 48% of the drug is cleared renally. 35% as unchanged drug and the rest as fragments Monitored by APTT or ECT(ecarin time) |
Half-life is about 1.3 hours |
| Bivalirudin | Mainly metabolised by proteolysis in the liver (80%) | 20% of the drug is cleared renally as unchanged drug; the rest is metabolised Monitored by APTT or ECT(ecarin time) |
Half life is about 20 minutes |
| Argatroban | Metabolised in the liver by hydroxylation and aromatisation of the 3- methyltetrahydroquinoline ring | Inactive metabolites are renally cleared. Monitored by APTT |
Half life is about 45 minutes |
Heparin is present in the body in the secretory granules of mast cells. It is also found in numerous animals, including various invertebrates which don't have anything even remotely resembling the human coagulation cascade. Which is weird. So nobody really knows exactly what its purpose is. But, in humans, heparin enhances the activity of antithrombin-III by a factor 1000. It does this by binding to antithrombin III and causing the active site to undergo a conformational change.
In this childish diagram, the flicking away of the antithrombin-III molecular tail represents the increased availability of the active site. Thus activated, antithrombin III inactivates several factors – but most notably, Xa and IIa (Thrombin).
The inactivation of thrombin depends on heparin molecule length. Specifically, 18 disaccharide units is the key number (about 5kDa). On the other hand, inactivation of Xa is independent of length: so long as any sort of heparin is bound to it, antithrombin-III will inactivate Xa. This underlies the difference in pharmacodynamic of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin.
Thus, in summary, unfractionated heparin affects thrombin, whereas low molecular weight heparin only affects Xa. This also explains why measuring APTT is not going to tell you whether the low molecular weight heparin dose is therapeutic.
The unfractionated heparin also affects the activity of Factor 9, but not the activity of Factor 7. Thus, the intrinsic and common pathways are affected, which increases the APTT. The extrinsic pathway is unaffected, and the PT does not rise very much. Because thrombin is unaffected by low molecular weight heparin, the APTT remains essentially unchanged.
Unlike heparin and the heparin-like drugs which make their effect felt by binding to antithrombin, most of the available alternatives (hirudin, lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) are direct thrombin inhibitors.
Apart from bleeding, which is an obvious answer, the only additional side effect which needs to be mentioned is HITS (Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome), which is discussed at greater length elsewhere. In short:
If one has overdone one's heparinisation, th APTT will rise dramatically, and one may have some sort of bleeding complications. One may be caught thinking, "I wish I could put the coagulation cascade back together". This can be accomplished with protamine:
Protamine sulfate is far from benign. It is a foreign, unusual substance- a strongly alkaline polypeptide which binds to strongly acidic heparin irreversibly, and thereby decreases its anticoagulant effect on antithrombin-3. However, in ridiculous doses, protamine itself will act as an anticoagulant.
Among its many adverse effects are the following:
The full pharmacology of protamine has never been a strongly emphasised element of the exam process, but perhaps somewhere nestled among all the useful material we might find the space for asides like this. So:
When reading in any detail about the chemistry and origins of this product, most normal people are taken aback by the sheer weirdness of infusing into other humans. Protamine is a small protein (approximately 5-13 kDa), originally derived from salmon sperm (and in fact called salmine for a time). Its effect on heparin were discovered by Chargaff & Olson (1937) when they were trying to increase the duration of the anticoagulant effect of heparin by following in the footsteps of Hagedorn et al (1936), who successfully produced the first long-acting insulin by combining it with salmon protamine. If insulin, they reasoned, why not heparin? But "in the case of heparin the effect was unexpected: the anticoagulant action of heparin in vivo was entirely stopped by protamine", the surprised authors wrote.
Pharmacokinetically, protamine was something of an unknown actor until Butterworth et al (2002) performed an extensive exploration of its properties, as they were baffled by how we could keep using this drug without any of this information. Its only bioavailable as an intravenous agent, which makes perfect sense as for your digestive system it is a nutrient indistinguishable from steak. It has a high pKa but is water soluble only with the help of a small amount of sulfuric acid, buffering the solution down to a pH of around 6. The immediate fate of protamine is something of a mystery; it appears to be confined the the circulating volume initially but then is found distributed to the lung and liver, where some of it is eliminated. Some sources also claim that some of it is eliminated renally (20-30%, according to DeLucia et al, 1993), but this does not seem entirely plausible considering its charge and size. Either way, the disappearance is so abrupt (half life of 5-7 minutes) that it often fails to clear all of the available heparin, resulting in "rebound" re-anticoagulation.
How does it work? In terms of charge polarity, protamine is the anti-albumin, the Ahriman to albumin's Ahura Mazda. It is perhaps the most positively charged substance you will ever infuse into a person. Arginine and lysine, the amino acids which protamine is mostly composed of, leave abundant positive charge on the surface of the molecule, such that at physiological pH there are 7-8 positive charges per kDa of protamine. That is the basis of its role in its usual domain (the sperm) - it binds to the negatively charged phosphate backbone of DNA and protects it from degradation during spermatogenesis. Infused into the heparinised human, it rapidly binds to the anionic heparin, and forms an inactive complex that has no anticoagulant activity. That complex is then eliminated by mechanisms which remain obscure, though one study in rats found it was eliminated by liver macrophages.
One might comment that something with this much positive charge on its surface will not lay about indolently, but is likely to have all kinds of unexpected reactions; and this would be entirely accurate. The excellent review by Sokolowska et al (2016) is to be recommended for the reader interested in the finest detail. In short, apart from heparin, there are many other anionic drugs of interest (beta-lactam antibiotics, for example) and protamine will readily remove these from the circulation. Moreover it has a tendency to have an anticoagulant effect all of its own, by an antiplatelet effect as well as by inhibition of the extrinsic pathway (Factor V activation by thrombin is reduced by protamine). It can also cause anaphylaxis, because it is a foreign substance, as well as myocardial depression, pulmonary hypertension, systemic vasodilation, pulmonary oedema and haemolysis. The literature on protamine toxicology is mostly a series of comments on the sad fact that protamine is the only option for heparin reversal for almost a hundred years, and that we tolerate it only because we have nothing better.
But does protamine reverse low molecular weight heparins? Yes, but incompletely. Crowther et al (2002) reports on the mechanisms of why and why not. In summary, the thrombin-inhibitory part of LMWH activity is completely neutralised, but not the anti-FXa activity, and the main factor seems to be reduced sulphate charge density (the specific anionic groups which attract protamine). If there were more sulfate charges to bind to, the protamine would be more effective, and the more sulfated products (eg. tinzaparin and dalteparin) are more efficiently inactivated, whereas only about 33-66% of the activity of relatively less sulfated enoxaparin is reversed by protamine. In fact, Crowther et al sulfated the bejesus out of some commercially available LMWH (to a density of three SO3- groups per disaccharide) and found that protamine comfortably reversed all of their activity, demonstrating the concept nicely.
There are situations in which vast quantities of IV heparin fail to increase the APTT in spite of your every effort. One might call this "heparin resistance", or "heparin insensitivity".
There are several reasons one might be resistant to heparin:
UpToDate offers a good article about Antithrombin III deficiency. Either you hereditarily fail to synthesise enough of it, or your liver is so damaged that it cannot produce enough. Or, it has been used up somehow, eg. in the context of DIC, MAHA, or in a bypass circuit. Lastly, it is possible that you are losing it along with other proteins via your leaky nephrotic kidneys. The management of AT-III deficiency is, predictably, supplementation with AT-III. If the expensive purified factor is not available, FFP will suffice.
There are several strategies one can employ. The specific choice relies on what exactly is causing the heparin resistance. There are some good articles on this. Most of them do not touch upon the routine anticoagulation of some random patient who happens to have escalating doses of heparin; I suppose it is generally assumed that one will continue to escalate the dose until such time as therapetic goals are met. However, there are situations when anticoagulation is critically important, and one such scenario is the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Or, you could consider using something else, such as a direct thrombin inhibitor (hirudin or argobatran)
Hirsh, Jack, et al. "Mechanism of action and pharmacology of unfractionated heparin." (2001): 1094-1096.
Hirsh, Jack, et al. "Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety." Chest 114.5 (1998): 489S-510S.
Boneu, Bernard, Claudine Caranobe, and Pierre Sie. "3 Pharmacokinetics of heparin and low molecular weight heparin." Bailliere's clinical haematology 3.3 (1990): 531-544.
Howell WH. The purification of heparin and its presence in blood. Am J Physiol 1925;11:553-62 - which does not seem to exist online - but is referenced elsewhere:
Hemker HC, Béguin S. Standard and method independent units for heparin anticoagulant activities. Thromb Haemost. 1993 Nov 15;70(5):724-8.
Mousa, Shaker A., et al. "Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral heparin solid dosage form in healthy human subjects." The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47.12 (2007): 1508-1520.
Engelberg, Hyman. "Orally ingested heparin is absorbed in, humans." Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 1.4 (1995): 283-285.
Franchini, Massimo. "Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an update."Thrombosis Journal 3.1 (2005): 14.
Anderson, J. A. M., and E. L. Saenko. "Editorial I Heparin resistance." British journal of anaesthesia 88.4 (2002): 467-469.
Young, E., et al. "Heparin binding to plasma proteins, an important mechanism for heparin resistance." Thrombosis and haemostasis 67.6 (1992): 639-643.
Hirsh, J., et al. "Heparin kinetics in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism." Circulation 53.4 (1976): 691-695.
Beresford, C. H. "Antithrombin III deficiency." Blood reviews 2.4 (1988): 239-250.
The PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Dalteparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Critically Ill Patients N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1305-1314April 7, 2011
Koster, Andreas, et al. "Management of heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass: the effect of five different anticoagulation strategies on hemostatic activation." Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 17.2 (2003): 171-175.
Isil, Canan Tulay, et al. "Management of heparin resistance in an emergency cardiac surgical patient." Indian journal of anaesthesia 56.4 (2012): 430.
Hobbhahn, J., et al. "[Complications caused by protamine. 1: Pharmacology and pathophysiology]." Der Anaesthesist 40.7 (1991): 365-374.
Shapira, N., et al. "Cardiovascular effects of protamine sulfate in man." The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 84.4 (1982): 505-514.
Lowenstein, Edward, et al. "Catastrophic pulmonary vasoconstriction associated with protamine reversal of heparin." Anesthesiology 59.5 (1983): 470-472.
Ingles, C. J., et al. "Biosynthesis of protamine during spermatogenesis in salmonoid fish." Biochemical and biophysical research communications 22.6 (1966): 627-634.
Holland, C. L., et al. "Adverse reactions to protamine sulfate following cardiac surgery." Clinical cardiology 7.3 (1984): 157-162.
Rydel, Timothy J., et al. "Refined structure of the hirudin-thrombin complex." Journal of molecular biology 221.2 (1991): 583-601.
Greinacher, Andreas, and Theodore E. Warkentin. "The direct thrombin inhibitor hirudin." Thrombosis and haemostasis 99.11 (2008): 819-829.
Cen, Xiaodong, et al. "Investigation on recombinant hirudin via oral route." Peptides 27.4 (2006): 836-840.
Shammas, Nicolas W. "Bivalirudin: pharmacology and clinical applications." Cardiovascular drug reviews 23.4 (2005): 345-360.
McAllister, Bruce M., and D. Joseph Demis. "Heparin metabolism: isolation and characterization of uroheparin." Nature 212.5059 (1966): 293-294.
Dawes, Joan, and Duncan S. Pepper. "Catabolism of low-dose heparin in man." Thrombosis Research 14.6 (1979): 845-860.
Young, Edward, et al. "Comparison of the non-specific binding of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (Enoxaparin) to plasma proteins." Thrombosis and haemostasis 70.10 (1993): 625-630.
Merli, Geno J., and James B. Groce. "Pharmacological and clinical differences between low-molecular-weight heparins: implications for prescribing practice and therapeutic interchange." Pharmacy and Therapeutics 35.2 (2010): 95.
Swan, Suzanne K., and Marcie J. Hursting. "The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban: effects of age, gender, and hepatic or renal dysfunction." Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 20.3 (2000): 318-329.
Balhorn, Rod. "The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins." Genome biology 8 (2007): 1-8.
Wagner, Nana-Maria, et al. "Peptide therapeutics in anesthesiology." Peptide and Peptidomimetic Therapeutics. Academic Press, 2022. 551-578.
Chargaff, Erwin, and Kenneth B. Olson. "Studies on the chemistry of blood coagulation: VI. Studies on the action of heparin and other anticoagulants. The influence of protamine on the anticoagulant effect in vivo." Journal of biological chemistry 122.1 (1937): 153-167.
HAGEDORN, Hans Christian, et al. "Protamine insulinate." Journal of the American Medical Association 106.3 (1936): 177-180.
Butterworth, John, et al. "The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of a single intravenous dose of protamine in normal volunteers." Anesthesia & Analgesia 94.3 (2002): 514-522.
Stehle, Gerd, et al. "Complexes of a modified low-molecular-weight heparin with protamine are predominantly cleared by a macrophage scavenger receptor-mediated process in rats." Journal of Surgical Research 58.2 (1995): 197-204.
DELUCIA III, A. L. P. H. O. N. S. E., et al. "Tissue distribution, circulating half-life, and excretion of intravenously administered protamine sulfate." ASAIO journal 39.3 (1993): M715-M718.
Mochizuki, Toshiaki, et al. "Protamine reversal of heparin affects platelet aggregation and activated clotting time after cardiopulmonary bypass." Anesthesia & Analgesia 87.4 (1998): 781-785.
Butterworth, John, et al. "Rapid disappearance of protamine in adults undergoing cardiac operation with cardiopulmonary bypass." The Annals of thoracic surgery 74.5 (2002): 1589-1595.
Sokolowska, Emilia, et al. "The toxicology of heparin reversal with protamine: past, present and future." Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology 12.8 (2016): 897-909.
Crowther, Mark A., et al. "Mechanisms responsible for the failure of protamine to inactivate low‐molecular‐weight heparin." British journal of haematology 116.1 (2002): 178-186.