A 60-year-old patient is 1 week post laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer, complicated by an ileus. The patient is confused, and investigations show the following blood results.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
FiO2 |
VBG |
|
|
pH |
7.59* |
7.35 – 7.45 |
|
pCO2 |
74* mmHg (9.8 kPa) |
35.0 – 45.0 (4.6 – 6.0) |
|
Bicarbonate |
72* mmol/L |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Base Excess |
+46* mmol/L |
-2.0 – +2.0 |
|
Lactate |
1.5 mmol/L |
0.5 – 1.6 |
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
146* mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
3.3* mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
68* mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
72* mmol/L |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
6 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
24* mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
232* μmol/L |
45 – 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.59* mmol/L |
0.75 – 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
30* g/L |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
64 g/L |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
14 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Ionised calcium |
0.9* mmol/L |
1.10 – 1.35 |
|
Calcium corrected |
1.90* mmol/L |
2.12 – 2.62 |
8.1. List the four most likely causes for the venous blood gas and biochemical results and explain the mechanism for the abnormalities in your answer.
(40% marks)
8.2. Briefly discuss your assessment to differentiate the causes of the above blood results. (40% marks)
8.3. Outline the specific management options for the correction of the pH in this patient. (20% marks)
Aim: To allow the candidate to display knowledge of acid base status and blood gas interpretation.
Key sources include: Common core knowledge topic. CanMEDS Medical Expert.
Discussion: Candidates did well if they used a structured approach to the questions. A structured approach was particularly important for 8.2. Assessment is defined as history, investigations and examination as detailed in the glossary of terms. Discussion of differentiation of causes using these headings would help the candidate focus their answer, aid clarity, and help the candidate detail the content required to pass.
Candidates are advised to read the question as there were errors in using the ABG rules when the question stated VBG. These candidates did less well.
This SAQ design calls for the candidates to explain the mechanism of the abnormalities, which is a refreshing change from just having to identify and list them.
But: first, let's identify and list them.
Other abnormalities include:
So: the most likely causes are:
The mechanism for most of these would be the same:
8.2 - this "outline assessment" question would have benefited from a standard structure, which the examiners have hinted at.
In addition to these steps, one needs to acknowledge that it is not normal to be having delirium and ileus with high NG aspirates at seven days post hemicolectomy, which raises the suspicion that something must have happened intraoperatively. Perhaps some kind of imaging would be in order. Again this is not "assessment to differentiate the causes of the above blood results" but would definitely form a part of a mature approach to this case scenario, and would probably have attracted some marks.
8.3 - This "outline the specific management" question would be difficult to approach if you did not have a clear idea of what was causing this alkalosis and were inclined to wait for the results of the investigations before committing to a course of action. Indeed, without a specific diagnosis, specific management cannot be prescribed, and only generic management options can be tabled. Still, those are worth mentioning:
Galla, John H. "Metabolic alkalosis." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 11.2 (2000): 369-375.
Soifer, Jennifer T., and Hyung T. Kim. "Approach to metabolic alkalosis." Emergency Medicine Clinics 32.2 (2014): 453-463.
Webster, Nigel R., and Vivek Kulkarni. "Metabolic Alkalosis in the Critically III." Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 36.5 (1999): 497-510.