An adult patient is admitted to ICU following a seizure and is found to have severe hyponatraemia of unknown duration. The blood tests are as follows:
|
Parameter |
Patient |
Reference |
|
Urea |
35 mmol/L* |
3.0-8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
480 (μmol/L) * |
45-90 |
|
Sodium |
98 mmol/L* |
135-145 |
|
Glucose |
8 mmol/L* |
3.5 - 6.0 |
a) List SIX risk factors for osmotic demyelination syndrome. (2 marks)
b) Discuss your approach to correcting the hyponatraemia (prior to commencing renal replacement therapy) and provide your rationale. (4 marks)
c) The patient becomes anuric. Outline how ongoing hyponatraemia alters your approach to renal replacement therapy. (4 marks)
Syllabus topic/section:
2.1.7 Renal intensive care: Renal failure, renal replacement therapy: L1
2.1.7 Renal intensive care: Acid-base and electrolyte disorders: L1
Discussion:
Risk factors for demyelination syndrome were well recognised.
Candidates attracted more marks when they approached the discussion in part b) by starting with the underlying principles. Better answers addressed all the information in the stem (seizure, unknown duration of hyponatraemia and renal failure). By recognising the important risks of over correction of hyponatraemia in parts
b) and c), it was expected that candidates could address safe target levels of sodium along with a safe, specific plan for achieving this correction. There are many acceptable approaches to correction of hyponatraemia. All approaches were given marks based on the depth and specificity of their answer and not on any single preferred approach.
a) Risk factors for osmotic demyelination syndrome:
b) Approach to correcting the hyponatraemia:
The "discuss your approach" answer should probably be regarded somewhat differently to the "outline your management" answer. The concept of the "outline" is that short notes are added but that the rest remains mostly as a protocol, almost as if one is writing a plan of action for some junior staff to follow (including some rationale in the list of tasks, mainly for their education). The "discuss" answer is expected to be more thoughtful, making space for the possibility of doing the same thing using several possible options. And because this is worth four marks, one would have to communicate this thoughtfulness in 80-100 words. That would probably look something like this:
c) How ongoing hyponatraemia alters your approach to renal replacement therapy:
Spasovski, Goce. "Hyponatraemia—treatment standard 2024." Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 39.10 (2024): 1583-1592.
Verbalis, Joseph G., et al. "Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations." The American journal of medicine 126.10 (2013): S1-S42.
Bender, Filitsa H. "Successful treatment of severe hyponatremia in a patient with renal failure using continuous venovenous hemodialysis." American journal of kidney diseases 32.5 (1998): 829-831.
Wendland, Erik M., and Andre A. Kaplan. "A Proposed Approach to the Dialysis Prescription in Severely Hyponatremic Patients with End‐Stage Renal Disease." Seminars in dialysis. Vol. 25. No. 1. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2012.
Rosner, Mitchell H., and Michael J. Connor. "Management of severe hyponatremia with continuous renal replacement therapies." Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 13.5 (2018): 787-789.