LiDCO: lithium dilution cardiac output measurement

This chapter is relevant to Section G6(iii) of the 2023 CICM Primary Syllabus, which expects the exam candidate to "describe the methods of measurement of cardiac output, including limitations, potential sources of error, the need for calibration and the values obtained".  The only time LiDCO had ever appeared was Question 4 from the second paper of 2024, which asked the candidates to choose one from PiCCO, LiDCO and FloTrac  to explain their various properties. The comparison table from Ed Litton's old 2012 paper on this subject is an excellent place to start revision for this exotic cardiac output monitor. The time poor candidate is politely redirected to more important topics, as this will be unlikely to ever become a subject of a 10-mark SAQ, but if there is the need to read more, then Sundar & Panzica (2010) offer an excellent overview.

Principles of LiDCO

  • The basic premise is an indicator dilution method of cardiac output monitoring
  • Instead of a change in temperature, the change you measure is of concentration. This resembles the dye-indicator dilution method. 
  • A small amount of lithium chloride (0.002 to 0.004 mmol/kg) is injected into a vein
  • A lithium-sensitive electrode then senses the lithium in the arterial circulation
  • The resulting dilution curve is used to derive cardiac output by the Fick method, as well as several calculated variables.
  • The resulting variables are used to calibrate the analysis of the pulse contour
  • Ths calibration should happen every 8 hours or so

lithium dilution diagram

Why lithium? Why not, say, thorium? In small doses, lithium is non-toxic. The dose used here is about 1/240th of the effective mood stabiliser dose. There is also no significant first-pass loss, which satisfies the “critical boundary condition”, i.e no indicator disappears during measurement. 

Calibration of LiDCO

  • To be precise, LiDCO is actually the lithium-based calibration method, PulseCO is the thing that is being calibrated, and the whole system together is LiDCOplus.
  • PulseCO is "a beat-to-beat cardiac output monitor that calculates stroke volume from the arterial pressure waveform using an autocorrelation algorithm" (Sundar & Panzica, 2010)
  • Pulse power calculation (LiDCO) may be more accurate than other waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output
  • The algorithm used by the manufacturer is proprietary and  is not dependent on waveform morphology, i.e. it should not be confused by AF

Advantages of LiDCO

  • The concentration stays the same throughout the arterial circulation, and thus
    • You don’t need a big central artery to sample the lithium.
    • You don’t need to inject the lithium through a central vein
  • The technique shows good agreement with PA catheter thermodilution measurement.
  • The indicator is nontoxic and unlikely to cause arrhythmias (unlike the cold injectate)
  • There is  no risk of large vessel damage or PA rupture

Limitations of LiDCO

  • Same as all dilution methods, you get inaccurate results if there are shunts in the heart.
  • If you are already on lithium, this background lithium concentration will cause the machine to overestimate your cardiac output.
  • “electrode drift” can occur if there are high doses of muscle relaxants present (the quaternary ammonium residues interfere with the lithium sensor)
  • You do end up disposing of some blood each time you sample.
  • The inputs into the equations that run the cardiac output monitoring require you to input serum sodium and haematocrit measurements
  • The system does not report intrathoracic blood volume index
  • The support in the literature is smaller in terms of the number of studies as compared to PiCCO or the PA catheter

References

From Bersten and Soni’s” Oh's Intensive Care Manual”, 6th Edition, as well as http://www.pulsion.com/ who are sadly the best source for this sort of information.

Sundar, Sugantha, and Peter Panzica. "LiDCO systems." International anesthesiology clinics 48.1 (2010): 87-100.

Hadian, Mehrnaz, et al. "Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters." Critical care 14 (2010): 1-10.