| Class | Loop diuretic |
|---|---|
| Chemistry |
Anthranilic acid derivative |
| Routes of administration |
IV, IM, oral, sublingual, and as a neb |
| Absorption |
Variable oral bioavailability, between 10 and 100% (interindividual variability). |
| Solubility |
Acidic drug; pKa 3.6. Highly ionised (therefore poorly lipid soluble) in the relatively alkaline small intestine, as well as in the blood |
| Distribution |
VOD = 0.1-0.2L/kg, i.e. mainly confined to the circulating volume. 95% protein bound. Decreased albumin levels increase the volume of distribution and decrease the delivery of the drug to its useful site of action (tubular lumen) |
| Metabolism |
50% of the dose is metabolised in the kidney into an active glucouronide (which has only 25% of the parent drug agctivity) |
| Elimination |
Cleared renally - 50% of the administered dose is eliminated in this way, mainly by active secretion via the OAT organic anion transport proteins in the proximal convoluted tubule. Half life is about 30-120 minutes |
| Time course of action |
Effect lasts for six hours |
| Target receptor |
Binds competitively to the chloride binding site of the NKCC2 sodium-potassium-0chloride transport protein in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle |
| Mechanism of action |
Blockade of the NKCC2 transporter decreases the reabsorption of sodium potassium and chloride in the thick ascending limb |
| Clinical effects |
Hypovolemia (diuretic effect) |
| Literature reference |
FDA PI data sheet |
| CICM details of understanding | Level 1 |
| Mentioned around Deranged Physiology |
Furosemide; also classification of diuretics and probably the loop of Henle |
| Related SAQs |
Question 8 from the second paper of 2023 (frusemide vs acetazolamide) Question 14 from the first paper of 2020 (frusemide solo) Question 18 from the first paper of 2019 (frusemide solo) Question 16 from the first paper of 2018 (frusemide vs acetazolamide) Question 20 from the first paper of 2013 (frusemide vs acetazolamide) Question 16 from the first paper of 2012 (frusemide solo) Question 2 from the second paper of 2007 (classification) |