How would you determine the aetiology of severe hypercalcaemia? List the treatments appropriate for each aetiology.
Major causes of hypercalcaemia are: Increased calcium release from bone
• erosion of bone (malignant neoplasms eg. lung, breast, haematologic (include multiple myeloma), head & neerenal, prostate)
• release of calcium from bone with immobilization
. • humoral stimulation of calcium release (mainly PTH but also other hoonones)
Increased calcium intake
• calcium supplements.milk alkali syndrome
Both of these are augmented by the presence of renal impairment.
Aetiology determined by combination of history.examination and investigations.
History and Examination
• clinical features relate to symptoms due to hypercalcaemia (protean) and those due
underlying cause (specific or general of malignancy, immobilization, diet and medications)
Investigations
• to confirm malignancy or bony involvement (Xrays of chest, spine etc.)
• to assess bone turnover (alkaline phosphatase, urinary hydroxyproline)
• to assess level of PTII
Treatment is dependent on underlying aetiology, but general measures are aimed at minimising calcium entry into and maximising exit from the circulation :
1. Increased calcium excretion
• volume resuscitation to restore intravascular volume and tissue perfusion (usually normal saline, also inhibits calcium reabsorption in renal tubule)
• frusemide (increase calcium filtration and decreased reabsorption). Aim? 200-300 m1/hr.
2. Reducing calcium release
• biphosphonates (eg. etidronate) are absorbed to hydroxyapatite crystals and inhibit bone resorption and formation and inhibit osteoclast activity. Administered intravenously; onset of action 24-48 hours.
• calcitonin is less effective. Inhibits osteoclast activity and increases calcium excretion.
Parenteral administration but faster onset of .11ction (6-24 hours).
• plicamycin, gallium also used. Inorganic phosphate may be effective (multiple mechanisms)
but risks calcium precipitation
• glucocorticoids useful in some scenarios (excess intake or production of Vit D;
haematologic malignancies [tumouricidal effects])
3. Others
• correction of other electrolyte abnormalities (eg. K, Mg)
• removal of offending drugs (eg. thiazides, Vitamins A & D, calcium)
• restriction of calcium intake
• mobilisation (to reduce calcium release from bone)
This question closely resembles Question 7 from the first paper of 2001 (A patient is admitted to ICU because of severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia. List the manifestations and common causes) and Question 9 from the second paper of 2013 (List the clinical features of severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia and outline the treatment of this condition).
Question 18.1 from the the first paper of 2011 also deals with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, but in the context of a clinical scenario.
Causes and consequences of hypercalcemia are treated in slightly greater detail elsewhere.
Thus:
Primary endocrine causes
Paraneoplastic causes
|
Granulomatous disease
Drug-induced hypercalcemia
Random miscellaneous causes
|
Early manifestations (levels < 3.5mmol/L)
|
Late manifestations (levels over 3.5mmol/L)
|
Causes such as renal failure and prolonged immobility can usually be ruled out (or in) immediately after meeting the patient. Similarly, one can easily look at their drugs and see whether something iatrogenic is responsible. Then, one is left with primary endocrine disturbances and malignancy.
Thus, one may wish to launch the following investigations:
UpToDate has a nice chapter on this topic, for the paying customer.
Stewart, Andrew F. "Hypercalcemia associated with cancer." New England Journal of Medicine 352.4 (2005): 373-379.
Zawada Jr, E. T., D. B. Lee, and C. R. Kleeman. "Causes of hypercalcemia."Postgraduate medicine 66.4 (1979): 91-7.
Shane, Elizabeth, and I. Dinaz. "Hypercalcemia: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, differential diagnosis, and management." Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Favus MJ (ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams &Wilkins (1999): 183-87.
Endres, David B. "Investigation of hypercalcemia." Clinical biochemistry 45.12 (2012): 954-963.
A patient is admitted to ICU because of severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia. List the manifestations and common causes. It is found to be due to metastatic carcinoma of the breast. How should the hypercalcaemia be treated?
(see J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: S3-9) (a) Manifestations include
-kidney: polyuria, polydipsia, muscle weakness, oliguria, renal failure
-GIT : anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation
-CNS : weakness, lethargy and depression
-CVS : hypertension, shortened QT
-Musculoskeletal: bone pain
Common causes:
-hyperparathyroidism (primary, secondary, tertiary)
-neoplasia (humeral)
-immobilisation
-sarcoidosis
-Vit D intoxication
-recovery stage of pancreatitis or rhabdomyolysis.
(b) Treatment, if due to metastatic carcinoma of breast:
- rehydration with saline
- frusemide if fluid overloaded
- aggressive diuresis has a limited potential to remove calcium and may lead to renal dysfunction if inappropriate negative fluid balances ensues.
- Bisphosphonates are first line therapy in malignancy. They prevent osteolysis
- Calcitonin may be adjuvant
- Haemodialysis may be necessary if acute oliguric renal failure occurs.
This question closely resembles Question 8 from the second paper of 2000 (How would you determine the aetiology of severe hypercalcaemia? List the treatments appropriate for each aetiology) and Question 9 from the second paper of 2013 (List the clinical features of severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia and outline the treatment of this condition).
Question 18.1 from the the first paper of 2011 also deals with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, but in the context of a clinical scenario.
Causes and consequences of hypercalcemia are treated in slightly greater detail elsewhere.
Primary endocrine causes
Paraneoplastic causes
|
Granulomatous disease
Drug-induced hypercalcemia
Random miscellaneous causes
|
Early manifestations (levels < 3.5mmol/L)
|
Late manifestations (levels over 3.5mmol/L)
|
Management
Laupacis, Andreas, and Dean Fergusson. "Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome." Anesthesia & Analgesia 85.6 (1997): 1258-1267.
Levi, Marcel, et al. "Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant endpoints." The Lancet 354.9194 (1999): 1940-1947.
A eighty (80) year old man needs volume replacement to treat hypotension secondary to biliary sepsis. Compare and contrast one colloid and one crystalloid solution that maybe used in this context.
In marking this question it was realised that the candidates come from all parts of the world, especially Australia, Hong Kong and New Zealand. The choice of fluids reflected that diversity.
In “comparing and contrasting” it was expected that the candidate would cover content, manufacture, fate in the circulation, effects on organ function and idiosyncratic effects, not merely listing the properties but contrasting the properties within that list.
Eg. Normal Saline versus 4% Human Albumin (CSL).
Normal Saline is a sterile solution of 150mmol each of Na and Cl in I litre water whereas 4% albumin is prepared from human-donor, pooled blood by complex fractionation. The albumin cannot be regarded as sterile, but is heated to 60o C for 10 hours and prepared at low pH. Prion transfer is feasible. It contains 140 mmol/L Na, 128 mmol/L Cl.
Saline would be expected to distribute 25% intravascularly and 75% interstitially whereas albumin, theoretically, is iso-oncotic and expands the vascular compartment by the administered volume. This may not be true in the critically ill with high albumin turnover and capillary leak.
Saline will have effects via expansion of the appropriate compartments and will lead to increased cardiac output proportionately. In large volumes it may lead to oedema formation, hypernatraemia and hyperchloraemic acidosis. On the other hand, colloid,eg albumin, in one meta-analysis has been associated with higher mortality. It also contains pre kalikrein activator (PKA) which, although present in low amounts, may produce hypotension and bradycardia in conjunction with ACEI use.
The half-life of albumin is said to be 20 days. The distribution half-life of saline is short (30mins) and elimination half-life will depend on the hormonal milieu (ADH, ANP, aldosterone levels) due to hypovolaemia and stress.
Cost : Saline- $1-2 per litre
Albumin – free to users in Australia, theoretical cost ~$80 for 500mls.
Though this question is unique, it is difficult to come up with an answer which does not duplicate a series of other answers.
Instead, I will present here a copy of the table of colloid solutions (from Question 29, second paper of 2007) and a table of intravenous fluid content from the chapter on the applied physiology on fluid and electrolyte replacement.
| Property | Albumin (20%) | Gelofusine 4% | Dextran (10%) | Hydroxyethyl starch 6% |
| Drug class | Endogenous protein | Succynylated bovine gelatin | Branched polysaccharide | Amylopectin derivative |
| Molecular weight | 69 000 Da | 5 000 - 15 000 Da | 14 000-18 000 Da | 70 000 Da |
| Plasma halflife | 24 hours | 2.5 hours | 12 hours | 5 days |
| Elimination | Degradation by reticuloendothelial system | Renally excreted | Renally excreted | Some renally excreted, some metabolised by the reticuloendothelial system |
| Plasma expansion as a percentage of infused volume | 200-400% | 70-80% | 100-150% | ~100% |
| Advantages |
Antioxidant effects Free radical scavenging effects Protection of glycocalyx |
Cheap Relatively safe in renal failure No limits on infused volume |
Decreases the viscosity of blood, improving microcirculation No risk of CJ disease |
Cheap Large maximum allowable volume No risk of CJ disease Lowest risk of anaphylactoid recations among non-albumin colloids |
| Disadvantages |
Volume overload Transfusion reaction Expensive Risk of CJ disease |
Volume overload Anaphylactoid reactions Coagulopathy |
Volume overload Anaphylaxis Coagulopathy Interference with ABO crossmatch Renal failure (ATN) |
Volume overload Anaphylactoid reactions Coagulopathy Accumulation Renal failure Increase in amylase |
|
|
||||
|
Fluid |
osmolality |
pH |
dextrose |
Cl- |
HCO3 |
Na+ |
K+ |
Mg++ |
Ca++ |
lactate |
citrate |
acetate |
gluconate |
|
5% dextrose |
278 |
3.5-6.5 |
278 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
10% dextrose |
556 |
3.5-6.5 |
556 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
50% dextrose |
2780 |
3.5-6.5 |
2780 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Normal saline |
300 |
4.0-7.5 |
- |
150 |
- |
150 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
20% saline |
6840 |
4.0-7.5 |
- |
3422 |
- |
3422 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Hartmanns |
276 |
5.0-7.0 |
- |
112 |
- |
131 |
5 |
- |
2 |
28 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Plasma-Lyte 148 |
294 |
5.0-7.0 |
- |
98 |
- |
140 |
5 |
1.5 |
2 |
- |
- |
27 |
23 |
|
Albumin 20% |
210-262 |
7.0 |
- |
- |
- |
48-100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Packed cells |
? 340 |
6.79 |
49 |
150 |
11 |
150 |
20 |
- |
- |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
For a definitive treatment of all of this, you ought to pay homage to the gigantic and all-encompassing "Critical Care Nephrology" by Ronco Bellomo and Kellum (2009).
There is also extra stuff is from the Ronco et al article "The haemodialysis system: basic mechanisms of water and solute transport in extracorporeal renal replacement therapies" in Nephrol Dial Transplant ( 1998) 13 [Suppl 6 ]: 3–9.
Finally, the Gambro and Fresenius websites have been an excellent source of information.
List the causes of hyponatraemia in the intensive care patient population, and outline your management of hyponatraemia.
Causes are numerous. Lists should include:
Factitious: contaminated by hypotonic intravenous fluid
Isotonic: pseudohyponatraemia [hyperlipidaemia, hyperproteinaemia] Hypertonic: eg. hyperglycaemia, mannitol
Hypotonic:
• water retention: SIADH, inappropriate antidiuresis [eg. hypovolaemia, cardiac failure, pain, post-operative, renal failure], psychogenic polydipsia, TURP syndrome
• salt depletion: adrenocortical failure, diuretic excess
•
Management includes diagnosis and, if appropriate, specific treatment of underlying cause. Most patients are asymptomatic, with plasma Na > 120. Initial treatment with water restriction and isotonic saline is usually sufficient. More aggressive therapy (eg. hypertonic saline) is indicated if Na < 110, or if patient is symptomatic (eg. confusion, coma, seizures). Relationship of rate of correction of Na and risk of osmotic demyelination (central pontine myelinolysis) is controversial, but appears reduced if rate of correction of Na is less than 10-12 mmol/L (ie. :S 0.5 mmol/hr). Desmopressin (dDAVP) may be required to slow the rate of water excretion. Consider even administration of sterile water to lower sodium if rising too quickly.
This question closely resembles Question 14 from the first paper of 2005.
The answer to it is reproduced below:
Potential causes:
This is essentially the content of Box 93.1 from Anthony Delaney and Simon Finfer's chapter for Oh's Manual.
|
Spurious result Isotonic
Hypertonic
|
Water retention High urine sodium
Low urine sodium
|
Sodium excretion
|
Diagnosis on the basis of the above lab tests and historical findings:
History
The following bits of historical information are important:
The following standard battery of tests can be launched; particularly if history is unhelpful, or one cannot bring oneself to interview the patient or their family.
Treatment:
Lazaridis, Christos, et al. "High-Osmolarity Saline in Neurocritical Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*." Critical care medicine 41.5 (2013): 1353-1360.
Adrogué, Horacio J. "Consequences of inadequate management of hyponatremia." American journal of nephrology 25.3 (2005): 240-249.
Froelich, Matteus, et al. "Continuous hypertonic saline therapy and the occurrence of complications in neurocritically ill patients*." Critical care medicine 37.4 (2009): 1433-1441.
R J Martin Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: the osmotic demyelination syndromes J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:iii22-iii28 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.045906
For all electrolyte abnormality questions, I refer to the Electrolyte Quintet series from the Lancet. In the sodium article by Kumar, there is a table (Panel 2) from which the college answer seems to be derived (with a couple of changes). I have used that panel as my model answer.
Sumit Kumar, Tomas Berl. Sodium. The Lancet, Volume 352, Issue 9123, 18 July 1998, Pages 220-228
Laureno, Robert, and Barbara Illowsky Karp. "Myelinolysis after correction of hyponatremia." Annals of Internal Medicine 126.1 (1997): 57-62.
Lee, Eun Mi, et al. "Risk factors for central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis following orthotopic liver transplantation." European neurology 62.6 (2009): 362-368.
Adams, Raymond D., MAURICE VICTOR, and ELLIOTT L. MANCALL. "Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients." AMA Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry 81.2 (1959): 154-172.
Brown, William D. "Osmotic demyelination disorders: central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis." Current opinion in neurology 13.6 (2000): 691-697.
Harris, Cheryl P., J. J. Townsend, and J. Richard Baringer. "Symptomatic hyponatraemia: can myelinolysis be prevented by treatment?." Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 56.6 (1993): 626-632.
Outline the role of urinary electrolytes in the assessment of the critically ill patient.
Urinary electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride) can assist in the diagnosis of a number of electrolyte disturbances in ICU patients (especially where the intake of electrolytes is known and relatively controlled). This question does not refer to urinary pH or osmolality measurements. Some of the more commonly used example are included here. In assessing oliguria: a spot urinary sodium when low (<10 mmol/L) can indicate depleted extracellular volume and a pre-renal cause, whereas
>20 is more indicative of tubular damage. Hyponatraemia associated with extrarenal losses should be associated with a low spot urinary sodium (<10), whereas a higher level (>20) is more indicative of other causes (e.g. renal salt losing states, SIADH, and diuretic therapy). Fractional excretion of sodium can be calculated (100*UNa*PCr/PNa*UCr) but its ability to determine causes of oliguria (e.g. <1% implies pre-renal)is limited by sodium intake and diuretic therapy. Urinary chloride estimation is of most use when assessing normal anion gap metabolic acidosis. Renal tubular acidosis is associated with impaired urinary acidification (decreased ammonium excretion) and this is associated with a low urinary chloride (e.g. <10 mmol/L), a positive urinary anion gap (Na + K – Cl), and an inappropriately high urinary pH (e.g. >6). If the acidosis is due to extra-renal losses of bicarbonate, in the absence of renal failure the kidneys will excrete ammonium (and chloride) resulting in a negative urinary anion gap (as urinary Cl > Na + K). Urinary potassium concentration can also help with the cause of hypokalaemia. Renal loss is generally indicated by >20 mmol/L as iopposed to an extra-renal loss (<20 mmol/L).
To present this topic systematically, one can either break it up into indications for urinary electrolyte testing, or into electrolytes tested (and the meaning of abnormal results). Both forms have a relevance.
A good article on this topic includes a table (Table 2.1) of urinary electrolyte results, their relevance, and the indications for the tests. I will repurpose some parts of this table for this answer.
| Indication |
Electrolyte |
Meaning of results |
| Oliguria | Na+ | Na+ < 20mmol/L: appropriate conservation of sodium in the context of hypovolemia |
| Na+ >20mmol/L: renal failure, eg. ATN | ||
| Hyponatremia | Na+ | Na+ < 20mmol/L: appropriate conservation of sodium in the context of hyponatremia |
| Na+ >20mmol/L: renal salt wasting or water conservation, eg: - cerebral salt wasting or SIADH - adrenal insufficiency - diuretic use - osmotic diuresis eg. mannitol or glucose |
||
| Normal anion gap metabolic acidosis | Urinary anion gap | Positive: renal causes of NAGMA |
| Negative: gastrointestinal causes of NAGMA | ||
| Urinary osmolal gap | In an acidaemic patient with NAGMA: Lower than 150 mOsm/kg = urinary acidification defect (renal tubular acidosis) Higher than 400 mOsm/kg = appropriate renal response to a non-renal cause of acidosis, eg. to diarrhoea. |
|
| Metabolic alkalosis | Cl- | 0-10: appropriate renal chloride conservation - gastric chloride losses - diuretic therapy (between doses) - post hypercapnea alkalosis |
| >20: inappropriate renal chloride loss - corticosteroid excess - hypertension - hyperaldosteronism |
||
| Hypokalemia | K+ | Low urinary potassium: <5-10mmol/L
|
High urinary potassium: >15mmol/L
|
Alternatively, you can organise it as a list. The list below is an adaptation of the table of contents for the chapter on urinary electrolytes, and clicking on the list items will take you to the Required Reading section where they are discussed in greater detail.
LITFL has an excellent summary.
There seems to only be one free fulltext article on this matter!
Reddi, Alluru S. "Interpretation of Urine Electrolytes and Osmolality." Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders. Springer New York, 2014. 13-19.
The rest, you people have to pay for.
Schrier, Robert W. "Diagnostic value of urinary sodium, chloride, urea, and flow." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 22.9 (2011): 1610-1613.
Harrington, John T., and Jordan J. Cohen. "Measurement of urinary electrolytes-indications and limitations." The New England journal of medicine 293.24 (1975): 1241.
Kamel, K. S., et al. "Urine electrolytes and osmolality: when and how to use them." American journal of nephrology 10.2 (1990): 89-102.
Kirschbaum, Barry, Domenic Sica, and F. Phillip Anderson. "Urine electrolytes and the urine anion and osmolar gaps." Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 133.6 (1999): 597-604.
Critically evaluate the role of albumin containing solutions in the management of the critically ill patient.
The role of albumin containing solutions in the critically ill is becoming clearer with time, but is still controversial. Earlier meta-analyses of heterogeneous trials had suggested increased mortality with albumin administration. The recently published SAFE study confirmed that 4% albumin administration was “safe” when compared with normal saline in those critically ill patients who required fluid resuscitation, but did not suggest any specificindications. The specific predetermined and stratified subset of patients where there is still significant doubt is in patients with multiple trauma where there seemed to be worse outcomes in the albumin group (in a post-hoc analysis thought mainly in those patients with severe head injury). Two prospective RCTs have demonstrated specific situations where albumin may actually be of benefit: improved oxygenation in hypo-proteinemic patients with acute lung injury (Martin CCM 2002), and improved mortality in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (Sort NEJM1999).
This question closely resembles Question 25 from the first paper of 2010.
The answer to it is reporduced below, to simplify revision
Albumin as a resuscitation fluid
Albumin for resuscitation of septic shock
Albumin for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Albumin for volume replacement in paracentesis
Albumin as an adjunct in hepatorenal syndrome
Albumin for extracorporeal detoxification in liver failure
Albumin as an adjunct to frusemide in ARDS
Albumin to aid water elimination in oedematous ICU patients
Albumin is to be avoided in traumatic brain injury
Much has been made of the findings of the SAFE study. The most recent ALBIOS study has supported the notion that albumin and saline are quivalent as resuscitation fluids. Furthermore, the authors found that the patients enrolled in early stages of sepsis did not demonstrate an early benefit, and that patients treated with albumin for longer tended to benefit more. This suggests that the benefit of albumin is derived not from a purely oncotic effect, but rather due to its ancillary functions as a nitric oxide modulator, antioxidant and anti-immunosuppressive. This is supported by the last salvo fired by Marik, who suggested that the contribution of albumin infusion to maintaining the integrity of the vascular endothelial glycocalyx is enough to support its role as "a reasonable intervention" in sepsis.
Outline your approach to the diagnosis and management of severe hyponatraemia.
Severe hyponatraemia implies either a very low level (eg. < 120 mmol/L) or one associated with significant symptoms (eg. neurologic). Approach should allow determination of aetiology by history, examination and simple investigations (and/or repetition of test). An approach involves measurement of plasma osmolality, urine osmolality and urine sodium concentration. Causes are multiple, and include:
Factitious: contaminated by hypotonic intravenous fluid
Isotonic: pseudohyponatraemia (eg. hyperlipidaemia, hyperproteinaemia)
Hypertonic: (eg. hyperglycaemia, mannitol) where hypertonicity induces movement of water out of cells, and lowers Na by dilution. No specific treatment is usually required.
Hypotonic:
• Water retention: (urinary Na is usually > 40 mmol/L) SIADH, inappropriate antidiuresis (eg. hypovolaemia, cardiac failure, pain, post-operative, renal failure), psychogenic polydipsia
• Salt depletion: (urinary Na is low, eg. < 20 mmol/L) adrenocortical failure, diuretic excess
Management includes diagnosis and, if appropriate, specific treatment of underlying cause. Most patients are asymptomatic, with plasma Na > 120.
Initial treatment obviously depends on the specific cause (eg. corticosteroids), but water restriction and isotonic saline is usually sufficient. More aggressive therapy (eg. hypertonic saline) is indicated if Na < 110, or if patient is symptomatic (eg. confusion, coma, seizures). Relationship of rate of correction of Na and risk of osmotic demyelination (central pontine myelinolysis) is controversial, but appears reduced if rate of correction of Na is less than 10-
12 mmol/L over the initial 24 hours (ie. < 0.5 mmol/hr). Desmopressin (dDAVP) may be required to slow the rate of water excretion. Consider even administration of sterile water to lower sodium if rising too quickly.
This is an easy question for the sodium enthusiast.
Somewhere, a chapter about the diagnosis of hyponatremia is waiting for me to finish it. However, that classification and diagnostic algorithm is based around urine osmolality rather than volume assessment, and thus is not the canonical view. Classically, hyponatremia is separated into classifications according to serum osmolality and volume status. In the answer, the college goes even further towards raw practicality and separates hypoosmolar hyponatremia into disorders which waste sodium , and disorders which retain water.
In any case, this question calls for a systematic approach.
History
The following bits of historical information are important:
The following standard battery of tests can be launched; particularly if history is unhelpful, or one cannot bring oneself to interview the patient or their family.
Essential tests:
Optional tests:
Potential causes:
This is essentially the content of Box 93.1 from Anthony Delaney and Simon Finfer's chapter for Oh's Manual.
|
Spurious result Isotonic
Hypertonic
|
Water retention High urine sodium
Low urine sodium
|
Sodium excretion
|
Diagnosis on the basis of the above lab tests and historical findings:
Treatment:
Chung HM, Kluge R, Schrier RW, Anderson RJ. Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia. Am J Med. 1987 Nov;83(5):905-8.
Milionis, Haralampos J., George L. Liamis, and Moses S. Elisaf. "The hyponatremic patient: a systematic approach to laboratory diagnosis."Canadian Medical Association Journal 166.8 (2002): 1056-1062.
Outline the methods available to estimate fluid balance in the critically ill patient and briefly discuss their advantages and limitations. (You may tabulate your answer)
|
Method |
Advantages |
Limitations |
|
Clinical – oedema, JVP, |
Simple, easily done by the |
Lack specificity |
|
Intake–output chart |
Simple method, reasonably |
Labour intensive, |
|
Body-weight |
May be useful in |
Not routinely used in all |
|
CVP and PCWP |
Used to predict |
Significant limitations |
|
EVLW |
Shown to be of value in a |
Invasive technique |
|
Research methods include |
Research tools, do not lend |
This question is identical to Question 16 from the second paper of 2009.
List 5 major causes and 3 important clinical manifestations of hypocalcaemia in the critically ill patient.
Aetiology
Calcium chelation (eg. alkalosis, citrate toxicity, tumour lysis, rhabdomyolysis)
Drug induced (eg. phenytoin, diphosphonates)
Hypoparathyroidism (eg. hypo and hypermagnesemia, sepsis, surgerical removal) Hypovitaminosis D (eg. inadequate intake, malabsorption, liver disease)
Reduced bone turnover (eg. osteoporosis, elderly, cachexia)
Clinical manifestations
Central nervous system (eg. circumoral and peripheral paraesthesia, muscle cramps, tetany, seizures, psychosis)
Cardiovascular (eg. arrhythmias, hypotension, inotrope unresponsiveness, prolonged QT intervals)
Respiratory (eg. apnoea, laryngospasm, bronchospasm)
Causes of hypocalcemia and consequences of hypocalcemia are discussed in detail elsewhere.
Here, I will reproduce the tables for the aetiologies of hypocalcemia and its clinical manifestations.
Low Parathyroid Hormone
|
High or normal Parathyroid hormone
Drugs
|
Mild hypocalcemia
|
Severe hypocalcemia
|
UpToDate has a nice summary of this topic for the paying customer.
Cooper, Mark S., and Neil JL Gittoes. "Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia." BMJ: British Medical Journal 336.7656 (2008): 1298.
Tohme, J. F., and J. P. Bilezikian. "Hypocalcemic emergencies." Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 22.2 (1993): 363-375.
Diercks, Deborah B., et al. "Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities." The Journal of emergency medicine 27.2 (2004): 153-160.
Write a short note on hypomagnesaemia.
A common electrolyte abnormality in the ICU:
Mg primary intracellular cation and plays a major·role in the transfer, storage and utilization of energy.
Causes: diarrhoea, NG suction, TPN, RTA, alcoholism, malabsorption
Drugs-amphotericin B, Aminoglycosides, Carbenicillins, diuretics.
Pathophysiology: Mg deficiency leads to a drop in ICF potassium and a rise in ICF Na., leading to an elevation in the resting membrane potential. This leads to a rise in the inward Ca current and hence the enhanced neurological and cardiac irritability.
Effects: Confusion, injtability, delirium, tremors, tachyanhytbmias, Torsade,
refractory hypokalemia and hypocalcemia.
Treatment: IV MgS04 in doses of 5-10 mmol/L, given slow IV. Repeated doses may
be required. Rapid administration can lead to hypotension.
There are few fellowship questions in this exam which ask the candidate to write a short note about anything. Understandably, somebody who was waiting to critically evaluate something or to discuss your management would have been taken aback by such a question. How does one structure a response?
Using this article, I have attempted a coherent answer.
Causes of hypomagnesaemia
Consequences of hypomagnesaemia
Pathophysiology of cardiac consequences
Management of hypomagnesaemia
In greater detail, from the hypomagnesemia chapter:
Gastrointestinal disorders
Endocrine disorders
|
Renal diseases
Drugs
|
A better way to organise the list of causes would be by pathophysiological disturbance, as below.
|
Increased Loss Gastrointestinal loss
Renal loss
Sequestration and chelation
|
Decreased intake Poor intake
Poor absorption
Unclear association with low magnesium
|
|
Symptoms Physical signs
|
ECG changes
Associated biochemical abnormalities
|
Agus, Zalman S. "Hypomagnesemia." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10.7 (1999): 1616-1622.
Kutsal, Ebru, et al. "Severe hypermagnesemia as a result of excessive cathartic ingestion in a child without renal failure." Pediatric emergency care 23.8 (2007): 570-572.
SHILS, MAURICE E. "Experimental human magnesium depletion." Medicine 48.1 (1969): 61.
Grubbs, Robert D., and Michael E. Maguire. "Magnesium as a regulatory cation: criteria and evaluation." Magnesium 6.3 (1986): 113-127.
Martin, Kevin J., Esther A. González, and Eduardo Slatopolsky. "Clinical consequences and management of hypomagnesemia." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 20.11 (2009): 2291-2295.
Chakraborti, Sajal, et al. "Protective role of magnesium in cardiovascular diseases: a review." Molecular and cellular biochemistry 238.1-2 (2002): 163-179.
Compare and contrast albumin and gelatins (Haemaccel and Gelofusin) as volume replacement fluids in the critically ill patient.
|
Albumin |
Haemaccel & |
|
|
Pharmacology |
5% and 20%, |
Semisynthetic, |
|
Shelf life |
1 yr shelf life at |
Long shelf lives |
|
Indications for use |
Used for treatment |
Used for |
|
Published data |
Proven to be Tendency for better |
No published data |
|
Side effects |
No risk of |
Lower risk of |
|
Complications |
Risk of CJ disease |
No risk or lesser |
Physiological responses to concentrated human albumin and to Gelofusine are discussed in greater detail elsewhere. Haemaccel is not used locally, and thus I have never had very much interest in it (sorry, Haemaccel enthusiasts).
This question asks the candidate to compare and contrast them as volume replacement fluids in the critically ill patients. Sukanaya Mitra published a 2009 paper which goes some of the way towards answering this question for us; it summarises the key concepts, and expands on the range of colloids by also discussing the hydroxyethyl starches and dextrans.
Out of respect for this paper, I will make an attempt to summarise it into a table format.
| Property | Albumin (20%) | Gelofusine 4% | Dextran (10%) | Hydroxyethyl starch 6% |
| Drug class | Endogenous protein | Succynylated bovine gelatin | Branched polysaccharide | Amylopectin derivative |
| Molecular weight | 69 000 Da | 5 000 - 15 000 Da | 14 000-18 000 Da | 70 000 Da |
| Plasma halflife | 24 hours | 2.5 hours | 12 hours | 5 days |
| Elimination | Degradation by reticuloendothelial system | Renally excreted | Renally excreted | Some renally excreted, some metabolised by the reticuloendothelial system |
| Plasma expansion as a percentage of infused volume | 200-400% | 70-80% | 100-150% | ~100% |
| Advantages |
Antioxidant effects Free radical scavenging effects Protection of glycocalyx |
Cheap Relatively safe in renal failure No limits on infused volume |
Decreases the viscosity of blood, improving microcirculation No risk of CJ disease |
Cheap Large maximum allowable volume No risk of CJ disease Lowest risk of anaphylactoid recations among non-albumin colloids |
| Disadvantages |
Volume overload Transfusion reaction Expensive Risk of CJ disease |
Volume overload Anaphylactoid reactions Coagulopathy |
Volume overload Anaphylaxis Coagulopathy Interference with ABO crossmatch Renal failure (ATN) |
Volume overload Anaphylactoid reactions Coagulopathy Accumulation Renal failure Increase in amylase |
Evidence:
|
||||
The albumin page and Gelofusine page are extensively referenced and I will not reproduce that stuff here.
Mitra, Sukanya, and Purva Khandelwal. "Are all colloids same? How to select the right colloid?." Indian journal of anaesthesia 53.5 (2009): 592.
Finfer, Simon, et al. "A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit." N Engl j Med 350.22 (2004): 2247-2256.
Ertmer, Christian, et al. "Relevance of non-albumin colloids in intensive care medicine." Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 23.2 (2009): 193-212.
Myburgh, John A., et al. "Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care." New England Journal of Medicine 367.20 (2012): 1901-1911.
A 69 yo male with a history of previous pneumonectomy for lung carcinoma, is admitted with confusion. There were no focal neurological signs on clinical examination. Neck stiffness was not present. Contrast CT brain scan is normal
His initial plasma biochemistry is shown:
|
Na+ |
148 mmol/L |
(134-145) |
|
K+ |
3.7mmol/L |
(3.5-5.0) |
|
Cl- |
109mmol/L |
(97-107) |
|
HCO3- |
33mmol/L |
(24-34) |
|
Albumin |
15 G/L |
(35-40) |
|
Urea |
12.8 mmol/L |
(3.1-8.1) |
|
Creatinine |
36 micromol/L |
(60-100) |
|
Ca++ |
2.59 mmol/l |
(2.20-2.55) |
|
Phosphate |
0.86 mmol/L |
(0.78-1.43) |
|
Mg++ |
0.89 mmol/L |
(0.67-1.05) |
a) What is the most likely cause of the confusion in this patient, based on the above information? Justify your response.
List 4 therapies for the cause stated in a)
Hypercalcemia (When corrected for albumin, the true calcium is higher).
Extra marks for recognising the inaccuracy of this correction
List 4 therapies for the cause stated in a)
Calciuresis (saline +/-frusemide)
Bisphosphonates
Calcitonin
Corticosteroids
NSAIDS
Mithramycin
This question resembles Question 18.1 from the first paper of 2011- or rather, the answer to this question. Again, hypercalcemia is brought out.
In this case, however, it is "occult" hypercalcemia, obscured by the normal-looking numbers.
But, if one corrects for the albumin...
Corrected calcium = (0.02 × (normal albumin - patient's albumin)) + serum calcium
or
Ca++ = (0.02 × (40-15) + 2.59
Thus,
Ca++ = 3.09
This formula was first described by Payne et al in 1973.
In brief, these are the physiological aims for management of hypercalcemia, and the means to achieve them:
Payne, R. B., et al. "Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins." British Medical Journal 4.5893 (1973): 643.
A 55 yo male with a history of significant alcohol intake presents with a 2-week history of lethargy. He takes no regular medications and has no other medical disorders. Clinically, he appears malnourished and euvolaemic. Investigations reveal:
| Plasma | ||
| Normal Range | ||
| Na+ | 115 mmol/L | 134-143 |
| K+ | 3.7 mmol/L | 3.5-5.0 |
| Cl- | 80 mmol/L | 97-107 |
| HCO3- | 22 mmol/L | 24-34 |
| Urea | 3.0 mmol/L | 3.1-8.1 |
| Creatinine | 46 micromol/L | 50-90 |
| Glucose | 4.1 mmol/L | 4.4-6.8 |
| Osmolality | 241 mmol/Kg | 274-289 |
|
Urine |
||
| Na+ | <5mmol/L | |
| Osmolality | 53 mmol/Kg | |
a) What is the most likely cause of the hyponatraemia?
Water intoxication.
This is a hypoosmolar hyponatremia with low urine osmolality and low urine sodium.
I.e. the kidneys are making an excellent effort to excrete copious amounts of water while preserving sodium, which means that not only is the renal response appropriate, but that the whole body systems are actively trying to defend tonicity. This is the sort of response one would expect from a sudden massive excess of water.
So. how did this happen?
Well: the differentials in this scenario would include
Hariprasad MK, Eisinger RP, Nadler IM, Padmanabhan CS, Nidus BD. Hyponatremia in psychogenic polydipsia. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Dec;140(12):1639-42.
Hilden T, Svendsen TL. Electrolyte disturbances in beer drinkers. A specific "hypo-osmolality syndrome". Lancet. 1975 Aug 9;2(7928):245-6.
Thaler SM, Teitelbaum I, Berl T. "Beer potomania" in non-beer drinkers: effect of low dietary solute intake. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jun;31(6):1028-31.
Fox BD.Crash diet potomania. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):942.
Lipschutz JH, Arieff AI. Reset osmostat in a healthy patient. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 1;120(7):574-6.
A 76 yo female presents with seizures. She takes no regular medications. On examination she weighs 60kg, has no evidence of cardiac failure or liver disease, and appears euvolaemic. Her blood results in the emergency department reveal:
| Plasma | ||
| Normal Range | ||
| Na+ | 110mmol/L | 134-143 |
| K+ | 3.8 mmol/L | 3.5-5.0 |
| Cl- | 81 mmol/L | 97-107 |
| HCO3- | 24 mmol/L | 24-34 |
| Urea | 5.7 mmol/L | 3.1-8.1 |
| Creatinine | 36 micromol/L | 50-90 |
| Glucose | 4.1 mmol/L | 4.4-6.8 |
| Osmolality | 237 mmol/Kg | 274-289 |
|
Urine |
||
| Na+ | 23 mmol/L | |
| Osmolality | 488 mmol/Kg | |
a) What is the likely cause of the hyponatraemia?
b) Approximately how many mmol of NaCl would need to be given to raise her serum sodium to 120mmol/L? . Show your calculations.
a) What is the likely cause of the hyponatraemia?
SIADH
b) Approximately how many mmol of NaCl would need to be given to raise her serum sodium to 120mmol/L? . Show your calculations.
An answer between300 – 360 mmol was acceptable) (Sodium deficit = TBW x (desired Na – Actual Na)
= 0.5/0.6 x 60 x (120-110)
= 30/36 x 10
= 300/360)
This is a hypoosmolar hyponatremia with a high urine osmolality and a high urine sodium.
The urine osmolality suggests that the kidneys are retaining water in spite of decreased body tonicity, and the inappropriately high urine sodium (>20mmol/L) suggests that are negligently wasting sodium. Of course, nobody is wasting anything - they are merely excreting a normal daily load (150-250mmol in the Western world), keeping up with intake.
This smells like SIADH.
Alternative differentials might include
But wait. Is this really SIADH, with that urinary sodium? One needs to point out that the 20mmol/L cutoff is actually from the old Bartter & Schwartz criteria (dating back to 1967), that call for:
This is supported by the modern RCPA cutoffs and the 2015 European guidelines. Other authors give a urinary sodium cutoff of 30 mmol/L. Modern international sources with paywall-level authority aim as high as 40 mmol/L, and even though they give a 2001 textbook chapter as a supporting reference, that value is supported by the most recent entry at the time of writing, a 2018 European consensus statement from enough acronyms to sound very authoritative and official (SIE, SIN, AIOM).
The question about sodium replacement relies on the candidate's ability to recall the formula for total body sodium deficit.
The formula is as follows:
Na+ Deficit = Total Body Water × Weight in kg × (desired Na+ - measured Na+)
( where TBW = 0.6 if male and 0.5 if female)
Thus, for this 60kg lady, the calculation would be:
(60) × (0.5) × (140-110) = 900mmol ... to bring the sodium back to a normal range
But, of course, a more sensible target would be a sodium level where seizures are no longer a problem. 120mmol/L would suffice. Thereafter, one can rely on water restriction to maintain the steady rise of body tonicity. In this case, the lady only needs 300mmol of sodium, which is two bags of isotonic saline.
Palmer, Biff F. "Hyponatremia in patients with central nervous system disease: SIADH versus CSW." Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 14.4 (2003): 182-187.
Milionis, Haralampos J., George L. Liamis, and Moses S. Elisaf. "The hyponatremic patient: a systematic approach to laboratory diagnosis."Canadian Medical Association Journal 166.8 (2002): 1056-1062.
Bartter, Frederic C., and William B. Schwartz. "The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone." The American journal of medicine 42.5 (1967): 790-806.
Pliquett, Rainer U., and Nicholas Obermüller. "Endocrine testing for the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)." Endotext [Internet] (2022).
Compare and contrast the pharmacology of carbicarb, Sodium bicarbonate and THAM.
Carbicarb is an equimolar combination of sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate, generates a smaller rise in CO2 than sodabicarb. More consistently increases intracellular pH, inconsistent effects on hemodynamics, not commonly used clinically.
Sodabicarb: 8.4% or 4.2% solution. Hyperosmolar, generates high CO2, can cause paradoxical acidosis in the presence of a low output, cause hypokalemia, alkalosis and left shift of the curve. Phlebitis when given peripherally. On the other hand, frequently used to treat a metabolic acidosis if pH < 7.1, improves vasopressor responsiveness, may have a role in decreasing contrast nephropathy.
THAM: commercially available weak alkali. Buffers H+ ions. Buffering not associated with a CO2 rise. Side effects include hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, extravasation related necrosis, and hepatic dysfunction.
Sodium bicarbonate pharmacology is discussed at length elsewhere. It is a dear and familiar product to most ICU trainees. The other two products are somewhat more exotic, and deserve a brief digression. For instance, carbicarb does not seem to be available in Australia.
As a table, the answer would look like this:
| Sodium bicarbonate | Carbicarb | THAM | |
| Properties |
An 8.4% (1mol/L) solution of NaHCO3 which offers 1000mmol/L of HCO3- and Na+ions. |
An equimolar (300mmol/L) solution of Na2CO3 and NaHCO3which offers 666mmol/L of HCO3- ions, and 1000mmol/L of Na+ ions |
An organic amine buffer, otherwise known as tris-hydroxymethyl-aminomethane, or tromethamine. The 3mol/L solution offers |
| Administration |
Ideally IV, but can be given orally |
IV only |
IV only |
| Pharmacokinetics |
Eliminated renally, as well as being converted to CO2 and exhaled (in process of buffering reactions). These two substances differ mainly in the amount of bicarbonate anion they add. |
Rapidly eliminated by the kidney; 75% is excreted in the urine after 8 hours. |
|
| Adverse effects |
|
|
|
| Rationale for use |
Sodium bicarbonate contributes HCO3- which is a natural buffer, thus replenishing the buffer systems of the body in a state of acidosis. |
The sodium carbonate component is supposed to act as a bicarbonae precursor, regenerating HCO3- buffers without increasing the PaCO2. |
THAM is a "third buffer" to complement the buffering capacity of endogenous HCO3- and body protein. At pH of 7.40, 30% of THAM is not ionized and therefore may penetrate cells and act as an intracellular buffer. |
| Indications |
|
|
|
|
Contraindications (or, situations in which it is known to be useless) |
|
|
In neonates it is |
Rhee, K. H., et al. "Carbicarb, sodium bicarbonate, and sodium chloride in hypoxic lactic acidosis. Effect on arterial blood gases, lactate concentrations, hemodynamic variables, and myocardial intracellular pH." CHEST Journal 104.3 (1993): 913-918.
Schmidt, G. A. "Treatment of Acidosis: Sodium Bicarbonate and Other Drugs."Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine—APICE. Springer Milan, 2002. 681-693.
Filley, G. F., and N. B. Kindig. "Carbicarb, an alkalinizing ion-generating agent of possible clinical usefulness." Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 96 (1985): 141.
Outline the methods available to estimate fluid balance in the critically ill patient and briefly discuss their advantages and limitations. (You may tabulate your answer).
|
Method |
Advantages |
Limitations |
|
Clinical – oedema, JVP, |
Simple, easily done by the |
Lack specificity |
|
Intake–output chart |
Simple method, reasonably |
Labour intensive, |
|
Body-weight |
May be useful in |
Not routinely used in all |
|
CVP/ PCWP/Echo |
Used to predict |
Significant limitations |
|
EVLW |
Shown to be of value in a trial comparing it with PAC |
Invasive technique |
|
Research methods include |
Research tools, do not lend |
This tabulated reponse is difficult to improve upon. It is reasonably comprehensive, and it remains within the realms of the achievable for a crazed exam candidate.
The college answer seems to ask about the estimation of total body water, rather than any other sort of fluid-related assessment. The candidate who carried on about estimation of fluid responsiveness would have been penalised.
The table mentioned above could be treated in a slightly more granular fashion, and I will attempt to do this with some references, expanding on some omitted details (for instance, it is perhaps insufficiently enlightening to simply say that the pulmonary artery catheter and CVP have "significant limitations").
Method |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
| Clinical estimates |
|
|
| Fluid balance chart |
|
|
| Daily weights |
|
|
| CVP |
|
|
| PAWP |
|
|
| TTE |
|
|
| PAC or PiCCO EVLW |
|
|
| Bioimpedance |
|
|
| Tritium indicator dilution |
|
|
Schneider, Antoine G., et al. "Estimation of fluid status changes in critically ill patients: Fluid balance chart or electronic bed weight?." Journal of critical care27.6 (2012): 745-e7.
Schoeller DA, van Santen E, Peterson DW, Dietz W, Jaspan J, Klein PD: Total body water measurement in humans with 18O and 2H labeled water. Am J Clin Nutr 1980, 33(12):2686-2693
Charra, Bernard. "Fluid balance, dry weight, and blood pressure in dialysis."Hemodialysis International 11.1 (2007): 21-31.
Stephan, F., et al. "Clinical evaluation of circulating blood volume in critically ill patients—contribution of a clinical scoring system†." British journal of anaesthesia 86.6 (2001): 754-762.
Chung, Hsaio-Min, et al. "Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia." The American journal of medicine 83.5 (1987): 905-908.
Schneider, Antoine Guillaume, et al. "Electronic bed weighing vs daily fluid balance changes after cardiac surgery." Journal of critical care 28.6 (2013): 1113-e1.
Perren, A., et al. "Fluid balance in critically ill patients. Should we really rely on it?." Minerva anestesiologica (2011).
Wilson, John N., et al. "Central venous pressure in optimal blood volume maintenance." Archives of Surgery 85.4 (1962): 563-578.
Piccoli, Antonio, et al. "Relationship between central venous pressure and bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill patients." Critical care medicine28.1 (2000): 132-137.
Marik, Paul E., Michael Baram, and Bobbak Vahid. "Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares." CHEST Journal 134.1 (2008): 172-178.
Mitchell, John P., et al. "Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically III patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization." American Review of Respiratory Disease 145.5 (1992): 990-998.
Bethlehem, Carina, et al. "The impact of a pulmonary-artery-catheter-based protocol on fluid and catecholamine administration in early sepsis." Critical care research and practice 2012 (2012).
Schwann, Nanette M., et al. "Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery." Anesthesia & Analgesia 113.5 (2011): 994-1002.
Wheeler, A. P., et al. "Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury." N Engl J Med 354.21 (2006): 2213-2224.
Nguyen, Viviane TQ, et al. "Handheld echocardiography offers rapid assessment of clinical volume status." American heart journal 156.3 (2008): 537-542.
Schuller, D., et al. "Fluid balance during pulmonary edema. Is fluid gain a marker or a cause of poor outcome?." CHEST Journal 100.4 (1991): 1068-1075.
Marik, Paul E. "Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy." Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine 11.3 (2010): 102-112.
Monnet, Xavier, et al. "Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS." Intensive care medicine 33.3 (2007): 448-453.
Mattar, J. A. "Application of total body bioimpedance to the critically ill patient. Brazilian Group for Bioimpedance Study." New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) 4.4 (1996): 493-503.
Foley, Kieran, et al. "Use of single-frequency bioimpedance at 50 kHz to estimate total body water in patients with multiple organ failure and fluid overload." Critical care medicine 27.8 (1999): 1472-1477.
Barry, Ben N., et al. "Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients."Critical Care 1.2 (1997): 71.
House, Andrew A., et al. "Volume assessment in mechanically ventilated critical care patients using bioimpedance vectorial analysis, brain natriuretic peptide, and central venous pressure." International journal of nephrology 2011 (2010).
Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al. "Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring-a consensus of 16." Crit Care 15.4 (2011): 229.
A 77 year old male undergoing transurethral prostatic resection under spinal anaesthesia becomes restless and agitated. He is intubated and ventilated in OT, the surgery is expedited, and he is transferred to ICU. His initial biochemistry profile is as follows:
Test |
Value |
Normal Range |
|
Sodium* |
113 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Chloride* |
87 mmol/L |
100 -110 |
|
Potassium |
4.5 mmol/L |
3.2 - 4.5 |
|
Glucose |
5.1 mmol/L |
3.6 – 7.7 |
|
Urea |
5.0 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Osmolality (measured) |
280 mOsm/kg |
280 – 300 |
a) Describe the important biochemical abnormalities.
b) What is the likely cause of this confusional state?
c) What transient neurological disturbance is likely in this clinical setting?
d) List two confirmatory biochemical features (other than those from the table above).
e) Do you believe hypertonic saline is indicated? Explain your reasoning.
21.2 Simultaneous arterial blood gas analysis is as follows:
|
Test |
Value |
|
FiO2 |
0.3 |
|
pH |
7.33 |
|
pO2 |
93 mm Hg (7.4 kPa) |
|
pCO2 |
33 mm Hg (4.4 kPa) |
|
HCO3-* |
16 mmol/L |
|
Standard base excess* |
-9.5 mEq/L |
a) Describe the acid- base status.
b) What is the mechanism of this disturbance?
21.3 After 7 hours, the biochemical profile is as follows:
|
Test |
Value |
Normal Range |
|
Sodium* |
130 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Chloride |
103 mmol/L |
100 -110 |
|
Potassium |
3.7 mmol/L |
3.2 - 4.5 |
|
Glucose |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.6 – 7.7 |
|
Urea* |
10.6 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Osmolality (measured) |
281 mOsm/kg |
280 – 300 |
a) What important changes have occurred since the initial profile, and how should they be interpreted?
b) Your registrar is concerned that the sodium is correcting too rapidly. Is there a basis for this concern, and what should be done?
A 77 year old male undergoing transurethral prostatic resection under spinal anaesthesia becomes restless and agitated. He is intubated and ventilated in OT, the surgery is expedited, and he is transferred to ICU. His initial biochemistry profile is as follows:
Test |
Value |
Normal Range |
|
Sodium* |
113 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Chloride* |
87 mmol/L |
100 -110 |
|
Potassium |
4.5 mmol/L |
3.2 - 4.5 |
|
Glucose |
5.1 mmol/L |
3.6 – 7.7 |
|
Urea |
5.0 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Osmolality (measured) |
280 mOsm/kg |
280 – 300 |
a) Describe the important biochemical abnormalities.
Severe normotonic hyponatraemia. The osmolar gap is increased to > 40 mOsm/kg (51 mosm/kg using 1.86*(Na + K) + urea + glucose, or 44 mOsm/kg using 2*Na + urea + glucose).
b) What is the likely cause of this confusional state?
Absorption of glycine / water irrigation solution causing glycine neurotoxicity. Glycine is an inhibitory neurotransmitter. Increased plasma ammonia may contribute, but the encephalopathy isnot due to a primary increase in brain water.
c) What transient neurological disturbance is likely in this clinical setting?
Visual impairment, blindness, sometimes fixed pupils. Should completely resolve in a few hours
d) List two confirmatory biochemical features (other than those from the table above).
Hyperammonaemia, hyperglycinaemia, hyperserinaemia, metabolic acidosis.
e) Do you believe hypertonic saline is indicated? Explain your reasoning.
None. The osmolality is normal. Hypertonic saline should only be considered if measured osmolality < 260 mOsm/kg (TE Oh p 967)
21.2 Simultaneous arterial blood gas analysis is as follows:
|
Test |
Value |
|
FiO2 |
0.3 |
|
pH |
7.33 |
|
pO2 |
93 mm Hg (7.4 kPa) |
|
pCO2 |
33 mm Hg (4.4 kPa) |
|
HCO3-* |
16 mmol/L |
|
Standard base excess* |
-9.5 mEq/L |
a) Describe the acid- base status.
Compensated metabolic acidosis – normal anion gap
b) What is the mechanism of this disturbance?
Water absorption (SID zero) reducing extracellular SID (in excess of ATOT dilution).
21.3 After 7 hours, the biochemical profile is as follows:
|
Test |
Value |
Normal Range |
|
Sodium* |
130 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Chloride |
103 mmol/L |
100 -110 |
|
Potassium |
3.7 mmol/L |
3.2 - 4.5 |
|
Glucose |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.6 – 7.7 |
|
Urea* |
10.6 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Osmolality (measured) |
281 mOsm/kg |
280 – 300 |
a) What important changes have occurred since the initial profile, and how should they be interpreted?
Osmolar gap now greatly reduced (to 16 mOsm/kg, or to 5 mOsm/kg using simple formula), indicating rapid glycine elimination. Sodium rapidly normalising, but plasma still normotonic
b) Your registrar is concerned that the sodium is correcting too rapidly. Is there a basis for this concern, and what should be done?
Rapid sodium correction is to be expected during glycine elimination, and is safe provided no sudden changes in osmolality.
The story given by the college makes one think immediately of the TURP syndrome, a cause of isoosmolar hyponatremia, which is seen less frequently these days because of a shift away from glycine-containing irrigation solutions.
a) The first part of the question asks about the important biochemical abnormalities. The college answer describes it as "normotonic hyponatremia". This is accurate, given that the given osmolality lies within the normal range of tonicity.
The osmolar gap is raised:
280 - (113 × 2 + 5.1 + 5) = 43.9
And so, this confirms one's instant impression that this a glycine-associated hyponatremia is causing this confusional state.
b) What is the likely cause of this confusional state?
Of the offered biochemistry values, only hyponatremia stands out.
However, it is not alone in the pathogenesis of this confusion.
Glycine itself has a well-known toxicity syndrome, and on top of that its metabolism by oxidative deamination can result in a massive excess of ammonia, with its own delirium-generating effects.
c)What transient neurological disturbance is likely in this clinical setting?
Traditionally, glycine toxicity causes blindness. Stupour and coma are also common. A good article on this topic has a table (Table 1) which lists other unpleasant CNS manifestations, including dilated unreactive pupils, seziures and paralysis.
d)List two confirmatory biochemical features (other than those from the table above).
Glycine toxicity is associated with the following biochemical changes, of which some have already been identified by the abovementioned test panel.
e) Hypertonic saline is not indicated in this setting; the serum sodium will return to normal when the glycine and free water have been eliminated, which does not take long. The neurological features of this syndrome are not due to cerebral oedema, but rather due to the direct neurotoxicity of the glycine, and thus one cannot call this "symptomatic hyponatremia".
21.2: The college asks us to interpret the ABG.
Let us do it systematically.
This is a consequence of absorbing pure water (which has an SID of 0) as well as a minor contribution from oxalate and serine.
21.3
a) What important changes have occurred since the initial profile, and how should they be interpreted?
The college now presents us with an essentially normal biochemical profile. The osmolar gap is now normal:
281 - (130 × 2 + 5.5 + 10.6) = 4.9
The glycine has therefore been eliminated.
b) Your registrar is concerned that the sodium is correcting too rapidly. Is there a basis for this concern, and what should be done?
The panicky registrar needs to be calmly reassured. The elimination of glycine has resulted in the normalisation of sodium, which is as rapid in onset as the hyponatremia. Only chronic hyponatremia needs to be worried about. Because the serum osmolality remains essentially unchanged, there is no danger of cerebral oedema.
Rhymer JC, Bell TJ, Perry KC, Ward JP. Hyponatraemia following transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1985 Aug;57(4):450-2.
Hahn, R. G. "Serum amino acid patterns and toxicity symptoms following the absorption of irrigant containing glycine in transurethral prostatic surgery." Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica 32.6 (1988): 493-501.
Roesch, Ryland P., et al. "Ammonia toxicity resulting from glycine absorption during a transurethral resection of the prostate." Anesthesiology 58.6 (1983): 577-578.
Glycine Toxicity page from The Anesthesia Practice Manual for Spectrum by Tom VerLee.
Gravenstein, Dietrich. "Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome: a review of the pathophysiology and management." Anesthesia & Analgesia 84.2 (1997): 438-446.
Hahn, R. G., and M. Rundgren. "Vasopressin and amino acid concentrations in serum following absorption of irrigating fluid containing glycine and ethanol."British journal of anaesthesia 63.3 (1989): 337-339.
Stewart, PA Hamilton, and I. M. Barlow. "Metabolic effects of prostatectomy."Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 82.12 (1989): 725-728.
Beal, J. L., et al. "Consequences of fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate using distilled water or glycine 1.5 per cent." Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 36.3 (1989): 278-282.
Fitzpatrick, J. M., G. P. Kasidas, and G. Alan Rose. "Hyperoxaluria following glycine irrigation for transurethral prostatectomy." British journal of urology 53.3 (1981): 250-252.
Critically evaluate the use of albumin-containing solutions in critically ill patients.
Albumin solutions are frequently used in critically ill patients for a variety of indications.
a) Volume replacement: The SAFE study showed that using colloids was equivalent in efficacy and safety to crystalloids.
b) Hypoalbuminaemia: Clinical conditions that may benefit from albumin replacement for hypoalbuminaemia include:-
Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The administration of albumin results in a reduced incidence of renal failure and reduction in mortality.
Patients with Acute Lung Injury or ARDS.The study by Martin CCM 2005 shows that in patients who are hypoproteinaemic with ARDS, adding albumin to frusemide resulted in a significant improvement in oxygenation compared to frusemide alone. There was also a greater net negative fluid balance achieved and better haemodynamic stability in patients receiving albumin.
Head injury: The clinical conditions in which you would avoid Albumin replacement is cerebral trauma where the SAFE subgroup analysis reported increased mortality at 28 days and 2 years.
Sepsis: In the SAFE subgroup, a trend towards an improved outcome with albumin was noted as compared to saline
In Australia, albumin is cheap (free). It is also risk free, not associated with serious complications such as coagulation abnormalities and renal failure as seen with other studies
This question is a broad "what uses for albumin can you think of" sort of question. A couple of albumin enthusiasts (Caironi and Gattinoni) have published a good overview of this topic.
Firstly, to the most notable and obvious part.
Albumin as a resuscitation fluid
Albumin for resuscitation of septic shock
Albumin for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Albumin for volume replacement in paracentesis
Albumin as an adjunct in hepatorenal syndrome
Albumin for extracorporeal detoxification in liver failure
Albumin as an adjunct to frusemide in ARDS
Albumin to aid water elimination in oedematous ICU patients
Albumin is to be avoided in traumatic brain injury
Much has been made of the findings of the SAFE study. The most recent ALBIOS study has supported the notion that albumin and saline are quivalent as resuscitation fluids. Furthermore, the authors found that the patients enrolled in early stages of sepsis did not demonstrate an early benefit, and that patients treated with albumin for longer tended to benefit more. This suggests that the benefit of albumin is derived not from a purely oncotic effect, but rather due to its ancillary functions as a nitric oxide modulator, antioxidant and anti-immunosuppressive. This is supported by the last salvo fired by Marik, who suggested that the contribution of albumin infusion to maintaining the integrity of the vascular endothelial glycocalyx is enough to support its role as "a reasonable intervention" in sepsis.
McEvoy, Rinaldo Bellomo, et al. "The SAFE Study Investigators Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis." Intensive Care Med 37 (2011): 86-96.
Finfer, Simon, et al. "A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit." N Engl j Med 350.22 (2004): 2247-2256.
Caironi, Pietro, et al. "Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock." New England Journal of Medicine 370.15 (2014): 1412-1421.
Marik, Paul E. "Early Management of Severe Sepsis: Concepts and Controversies." CHEST Journal 145.6 (2014): 1407-1418.
Patel, Amit, et al. "Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality." BMJ 349 (2014): g4561.
Myburgh, John, et al. "Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury." N Engl J Med 357.9 (2007): 874-884.
Bernardi, Mauro, Caterina Maggioli, and Giacomo Zaccherini. "Human albumin in the management of complications of liver cirrhosis." Crit Care 16.2 (2012): 211.
Gluud, Lise L., et al. "Systematic review of randomized trials on vasoconstrictor drugs for hepatorenal syndrome." Hepatology 51.2 (2010): 576-584.
Sort, Pau, et al. "Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis." New England Journal of Medicine 341.6 (1999): 403-409.
Karvellas, Constantine J., et al. "Bench-to-bedside review: current evidence for extracorporeal albumin dialysis systems in liver failure." Crit Care 11.3 (2007): 215.
Martin, Greg S., et al. "A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury." Critical care medicine 33.8 (2005): 1681-1687.
Caironi, Pietro, and Luciano Gattinoni. "The clinical use of albumin: the point of view of a specialist in intensive care." Blood Transfusion 7.4 (2009): 259.
1.1; Briefly outline the rationale for the use of hypertonic saline in:
1) Hyponatremia
2) Traumatic brain injury
1.2; List the possible complications of hypertonic saline administration.
1) Hyponatremia
Hyponatremia
• Severe hyponatremia (<120 mEq/L) can cause significant and permanent neurologic injury or death. In the event of seizures or acute collapse relatively rapid initial correction may be required.
• There is evidence that the severity and duration of hyponatremia may be related to cerebro pontine myelinolysis, normal saline and fluid restriction may be inadequate to increase sodium levels appropriately.
• Some conditions such as cerebral salt wasting or large GIT losses may result in losses that may not be able to be replaced by other means.
2) Traumatic brain injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
• The rationale for hypertonic saline compared with normal saline
• Better compensates for blood loss
• Improved CPP
• Reduces harmful inflammatory responses
• May prevent cerebral edema.
• Can be used as a continuous infusion
• Obviates the need for osmolality testing
Previous animal studies and smaller clinical trials suggested better outcomes in patients with TBI after use of hypertonic saline solution. The safety profile has been good, and some evidence suggests a potential survival benefit when hypertonic saline is given. However The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has stopped enrollment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) into a Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) trial testing the effects of hypertonic saline solutions given before arrival at the emergency department. as early as possible after TBI.
1073 patients 6 month analysis – no difference.
1.2 List the possible complications of hypertonic saline administration.
• Hypernatremia
• Hyperchloraemic acidaemia
• Renal failure
• CCF/Pulmonary Oedema
• Neurological SAH
• rebound intracranial H/T
• Central Pontine Myelinolysis
Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia
It is straightforward: one wants to replace the missing electrolyte.
However, it may not be the first line therapy.
In brief summary:
Hypertonic saline for traumatic brain injury
Osmotherapy for control of increased intracranial pressure is discussed in greater detail elsewhere. In brief summary:
Complications of hypertonic saline therapy
One review of 3% saline among neuroICU patients has a nice table (Table 1) which lists the potential adverse effects of hypertonic saline administration. I will reproduce the relevant parts of this table below. As you can see, the college answer for this section relies significantly on a source either identical to this one, or very closely resembling it.
Lazaridis, Christos, et al. "High-Osmolarity Saline in Neurocritical Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*." Critical care medicine 41.5 (2013): 1353-1360.
Adrogué, Horacio J. "Consequences of inadequate management of hyponatremia." American journal of nephrology 25.3 (2005): 240-249.
Froelich, Matteus, et al. "Continuous hypertonic saline therapy and the occurrence of complications in neurocritically ill patients*." Critical care medicine 37.4 (2009): 1433-1441.
A 50 year old patients is admitted to the ICU for airway observation following a difficult parathyroidectomy. No immediate airway problems were evident. About 24 hours later, the patient was noted to be in fast atrial fibrillation, and complained of difficulty in breathing with aches and pains.
a) What is the likely explanation for the patient’s symptoms?
b) Outline your management.
a) What is the likely explanation for the patient’s symptoms?
Hypocalcemia and possibly hypomagnesemia –e causing muscle cramps, possible laryngospasm and AF from electrolyte abnormalities. Some patients suffer from the post operative hungry bone syndrome whereby the calcium goes into the bone because of lack of PTH.
b) Outline your management.
• Ca gluconate or chloride – bolus or infusion
• Mg supplements
• Anti-arrhythmics for AF
The clinical features of hypocalcemia and the causes of hypocalcemia are discussed elsewhere. However, sophistication is not required to arrive at the answer here. This is a fairly straightforward pattern-recognition question, asking the candidate to recognise hypocalcemia as a possible complication of parathyroid surgery. The treatment, predictably, is the supplementation of calcium. One could go off on a tangent with AF management, and digress into a discussion of how one might want to replace calcium before attempting rate control with digoxin (digoxin being useless in the presence of hypocalcemia). However, this question is not worth enough marks for that.
Mittendorf, Elizabeth A., James I. Merlino, and Christopher R. McHenry. "Post-parathyroidectomy hypocalcemia: incidence, risk factors, and management."The American surgeon 70.2 (2004): 114-9.
Chopra, Deepak, Paul Janson, and Clark T. Sawin. "Insensitivity to digoxin associated with hypocalcemia." The New England journal of medicine 296.16 (1977): 917-918.
List the major biochemical abnormalities that are usually associated with the following conditions:
a) Adrenal insufficiency.
b) Refeeding syndrome.
c) Tumour lysis syndrome.
d) Ethylene glycol toxicity.
|
Adrenal Insufficiency |
Hyponatraemia |
|
Refeeding Syndrome |
Hypophosphataemia Hypokalaemia Hypomagnesaemia Hyperglycaemia |
|
Tumour Lysis Syndrome |
Hyperphosphataemia Hyperkalaemia Hypocalcaemia Hyperuricaemia Metabolic acidosis |
|
Ethylene Glycol Toxicity |
High anion gap acidosis High osmolar gap Hypocalcaemia |
The tabulated answer from the college is comprehensive, and would be difficult to improve upon.
Instead, I will offer links to detailed discussions of the abovementioned syndromes.
Cooper, Mark Stuart, and Paul Michael Stewart. "Adrenal insufficiency in critical illness." Journal of intensive care medicine 22.6 (2007): 348-362.
Khan, Laeeq UR, et al. "Refeeding syndrome: a literature review."Gastroenterology research and practice 2011 (2010).
Howard, Scott C., Deborah P. Jones, and Ching-Hon Pui. "The tumor lysis syndrome." New England Journal of Medicine 364.19 (2011): 1844-1854.
Parry, Michael F., and Ronald Wallach. "Ethylene glycol poisoning." The American Journal of Medicine 57.1 (1974): 143-150.
The blood results of a 75 year old who presents with lethargy, confusion and weight loss are shown below:
|
Patient value |
Normal range |
|
|
Sodium |
141 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
3.8 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
100 mmol/L |
97 – 109 |
|
Bicarbonate |
29 mmol/L |
24 – 32 |
|
Urea |
11.5 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
150 µmol/L |
70 – 110 |
|
Calcium |
4.69 mmol/L |
2.10 – 2.60 |
|
Phosphate |
0.4 mmol/L |
0.8 – 1.5 |
|
Albumin |
44 G/L |
38 – 48 |
a) What is the likely diagnosis?
b) What other biochemistry would you request and why?
c) Briefly explain the pathogenesis of the biochemical abnormalities.
d) Outline your management of this patient.
a) What is the likely diagnosis?
Underlying malignancy
b) What other biochemistry would you request and why?
PTH to exclude primary hyperPTH – very high calcium indicates malignancy but patients with malignancy have higher incidence of hyperPTH than general population so both conditions can co-exist
c) Briefly explain the pathogenesis of the biochemical abnormalities.
Hypercalcaemia:
Malignancy:
Increased PTH:
Elevated urea and creatinine:
d) Outline your management of this patient.
• Fluid replacement with NS
• Biphosphonates
• Calcitonin
• Steroids act by decreasing calcitriol
• Dialysis
• Treat underlying malignancy
• Parathyroidectomy if raised PTH
• (Diuretics no longer recommended)
As for the diagnosis- the clue is in the age and the weight loss, and the college does sound as if they are asking for the one most likely diagnosis. But if one were to approach this on classical footing, one would be expected to regurgitate a small pool of differentials.
|
Primary endocrine causes
Paraneoplastic causes
|
Granulomatous disease
Drug-induced hypercalcemia
Random miscellaneous causes
|
One may wish to launch the following investigations:
As for management, one would be well served to organise the response by the physiological aims of one's therapy:
A 75-yr-old woman on Indapamide for Hypertension presented with seizures after a 7- day history of increasing lethargy. She was unwell, had dry mucus membranes and decreased skin turgor with a BP 88/50. Her serum sodium was 103 mmol/L. Outline your fluid management and discuss relevant physiology.
a) This woman requires Hypertonic Saline for her hyponatremic encephalopathy.
b) She also requires isotonic fluid therapy (e.g. 0.9 % NaCl) to correct her Hypovolemia
Once volume repletion crosses the hypovolemic threshold for the adaptive excessive ADH
release that would have occurred (in part explaining her hyponatremia), there would be a
feed-back inhibition of the excess ADH release leading to massive aquaresis and the
increased free water excretion would help correct hyponatremia
Why is this old woman hyponatremic?
This is a symptomatic hypovolemic hyponatremia, likely due to renal losses of both sodium and free water, associated with the use of indapamide (a thiazide diuretic).
Fluid management:
Relevant physiology:
For all electrolyte abnormality questions, I refer to the Electrolyte Quintet series from the Lancet. In the sodium article by Kumar, there is a table (Pane 2) from which the college answer for 5.2(b) seems to be derived (with a couple of changes). I have used that panel as my model answer.
Sumit Kumar, Tomas Berl. Sodium. The Lancet, Volume 352, Issue 9123, 18 July 1998, Pages 220-228
SM Lauriat, T Berl: The Hyponatremic patients: practical focus on therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 1599–1607.
A 75-yr-old woman on Indapamide for Hypertension presented with seizures after a 7- day history of increasing lethargy. She was unwell, had dry mucus membranes and decreased skin turgor with a BP 88/50. Her serum sodium was 103 mmol/L.
By day 5 of her admission, the serum sodium has increased to 141 mmol/L. The antihypertensive therapy was adjusted and she was discharged home. Ten days after the initial presentation, she is readmitted with ataxia and confusion. On examination, the following findings were noted:
You are called to the ED to assess this patient as there are concerns that she might be an aspiration risk.
a) List 2 likely differential diagnoses for her presentation.
b) List 4 underlying predisposing conditions
a)
Pontine demyelination is a differential given the recent history of rapid sodium replacement.
Brainstem stroke is an alternative explanation.
b)
Patients at increased risk of osmotic demyelination:
Brainstem stoke? Really? But I suppose one must offer a differential.
A good article on pontine myelinolysis suggests that the pons is not unique and you can myelinolyse anywhere there is myelin. Typically, the early symptoms are dysartheria and dysphagia. They are followed by a flaccid quadriparesis.
The key issue is rate of correction. If the hyponatremia has lasted longer than 48 hours, we would be forced to call it "chronic". It takes brain cells about 48 hours to get rid of idiogenic osmoles and become isotonic with the hyponatremic extracellular fluid. However, once lost, those organic molecules take much longer to synthesise.
In short, your adaptation to hyponatremia is rapid, but your adaptation to a rising sodium is sluggish.
The result of bathing your neurons in a hypertonic solution is a shrinkage of those neurons. Water will easily cross the membrane into the hypertonic extracellular fluid, and the cells of the brain parenchyma will shrink and die.
The article mentioned above concludes with the sage advice that perhaps there is no such thing as a "maxiumum safe rate of replacement) but that most neurologists carry the figure of 10mmol/day in their head.
Risk factors for pontine myelinolysis?
Well. The first study (1959) which described this syndrome found it among alcoholic and malnourished patients. Later works extended the range of risk factors. In summary, they are as follows:
R J Martin Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: the osmotic demyelination syndromes J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:iii22-iii28 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.045906
For all electrolyte abnormality questions, I refer to the Electrolyte Quintet series from the Lancet. In the sodium article by Kumar, there is a table (Panel 2) from which the college answer seems to be derived (with a couple of changes). I have used that panel as my model answer.
Sumit Kumar, Tomas Berl. Sodium. The Lancet, Volume 352, Issue 9123, 18 July 1998, Pages 220-228
Laureno, Robert, and Barbara Illowsky Karp. "Myelinolysis after correction of hyponatremia." Annals of Internal Medicine 126.1 (1997): 57-62.
Lee, Eun Mi, et al. "Risk factors for central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis following orthotopic liver transplantation." European neurology 62.6 (2009): 362-368.
Adams, Raymond D., MAURICE VICTOR, and ELLIOTT L. MANCALL. "Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients." AMA Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry 81.2 (1959): 154-172.
Brown, William D. "Osmotic demyelination disorders: central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis." Current opinion in neurology 13.6 (2000): 691-697.
Harris, Cheryl P., J. J. Townsend, and J. Richard Baringer. "Symptomatic hyponatraemia: can myelinolysis be prevented by treatment?." Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 56.6 (1993): 626-632.
A 26-year-old male, admitted to the ICU 7 days ago following a traumatic brain injury, now has the following blood and urine results:
|
Test |
Value |
Normal Adult Range |
|
Sodium* |
128 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
3.8 mmol/L |
3.2 – 4.5 |
|
Chloride* |
94 mmol/L |
100 – 110 |
|
Bicarbonate* |
19 mmol/L |
24 – 32 |
|
Glucose |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.0 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
7.8 mmol/L |
2.7 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine* |
120 μmol/L |
65 – 115 |
|
Measured Osmolality* |
267 mosmol/Kg |
275 – 290 |
|
Urine Sodium |
76 |
|
|
Urine Potassium |
10 |
|
|
Urine Chloride |
96 |
|
|
Urine Osmolality |
350 mosmol/Kg |
50 – 1200 |
Give two possible diagnoses and the rationale for your answer.
SIADH
Cerebral salt wasting.
The presence of features that indicate hypovolaemia - low bicarb, high Cr and low plasma osmo and high anion gap .
Plus those indicating an ADH response – low plasma and high urine osmo.
Urine Na inappropriately high.
Hyponatremia due to SIADH and CSW is discussed in greated detail elsewhere.The combintion of traumatic brain injury and hyponatremia give rise to these two differentials almost involuntarily. This is a hypoosmolar hyponatremia with high urine osmolality and high urine sodium.
Urinary "osmo" (presumably, the examiner meant to finish typing "osmolality" but was called away to something very urgent) is relatively high, suggesting that there is a significant effect of ADH. This promotes SIADH as a differential. Consider that the serum osmolality is low, and the urine osmolality is high - obviously, the appropriate response to this situation would be to decreased ADH secretion and excrete buckets of dilute water-rich urine.
Urinary sodium sodium is also raised (i.e. over 40mmol/L), which suggests that for whatever reason, appropriate attempts to conserve sodium are not being made. This does not help to narrow the differentials very much, as it could be present in SIADH, cerebral salt wasting, hypoaldosteronism, hypoadrenalism, hypothyroidism, the polyuric phase of ATN, or with the use of thiazide diuretics. However, it excludes true hypovolemia (where efforts are made to conserve sodium).
Hypoaldosteronism and hypoadrenalism can be ruled out on the basis of a low serum potassium (it would normally be high in those situations). The polyuric phase of ATN normally has a more dilute urine, closer to 100mOsm/L. That leaves thiazides and hypothyroidism, which - though possible- have little relevance in the context of the history.
So, to discriminate between SIADH and cerebral salt wasting (both are a diagnosis of exclusion) one would have to examine the patient and decide whether they are underfilled (CSW) or euvolaemic (SIADH). This is the one situation in which the lazy man's approach to hyponatremia actually calls for a physical examination of the patient. The trick to discriminating between these two conditions lies in the ability to demonstrate that the body fluid volume is decreased. In both conditions the ADH level is elevated, but in cerebral salt wasting the ADH is elevated appropriately because the patient is hypovolemic, and so it cannot possibly be SIADH by definition.
Ashraf N, Locksley R, Arieff AI Thiazide-induced hyponatremia associated with death or neurologic damage in outpatients. Am J Med. 1981 Jun;70(6):1163-8.
Kyu Sig Hwang, M.D. and Gheun-Ho Kim, M.D. Published online 2010 June 30. Thiazide-Induced Hyponatremia Electrolyte Blood Press. 2010 June; 8(1): 51–57.
Kovesdy CP. Significance of hypo- and hypernatremia in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Mar;27(3):891-8.
Ahmed AB, George BC, Gonzalez-Auvert C, Dingman JF. Increased plasma arginine vasopressin in clinical adrenocortical insufficeincy and its inhibition by glucosteroids. J Clin Invest. 1967 Jan;46(1):111-23.
Schmitz PH, de Meijer PH, Meinders AE.Hyponatremia due to hypothyroidism: a pure renal mechanism. Neth J Med. 2001 Mar;58(3):143-9.
Hanna FW, Scanlon MF. Hyponatraemia, hypothyroidism, and role of arginine-vasopressin. Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):755-6.
Cerdà-Esteve M, Cuadrado-Godia E, Chillaron JJ, Pont-Sunyer C, Cucurella G, Fernández M, Goday A, Cano-Pérez JF, Rodríguez-Campello A, Roquer J Cerebral salt wasting syndrome: review. .Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):249-54
a) List the clinical features of severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia and outline the treatment of this condition.
b) List four common causes of ionised hypocalcaemia and for each give the underlying mechanism.
a)
Signs related to underlying malignancy:
Treatment:
Treatment includes reduction of hypercalcaemia and treatment of underlying cause.
Measures for reduction of hypercalcaemia- (listing of agents adequate, doses & mechanism not expected)
Saline/frusemide diuresis- correction of dehydration with about 2L of fluid and 80mg Frusemide 2-4 hourly (only when volume has been adequately replaced) with replacement of urine losses with fluid & monitoring of potassium, calcium, phosphate and magnesium. Caution in cardiac or renal failure.
NB: Although use of frusemide is controversial/may not be beneficial, most current textbooks still include it.
b)
Causes of ionised hypocalcaemia – any 4 individual causes:
Features of hypercalcemia are discussed elsewhere.
The table below is a satisfactory short summary:
|
Early manifestations (levels < 3.5mmol/L)
|
Late manifestations (levels over 3.5mmol/L)
|
Management of hypercalcemia has indeed moved on since the frusemide diuresis days. All the positive evidence for this practice was published before bisphosphonates became available.
The college graciously allows the candidates to get by without mentioning drug doses.The modern medical approach to hypercalcemia is summarised as the following list, ordered by escalating invasiveness of therapy.
Causes of hypocalcemia are discussed elsewhere. They are numerous. Though the college asks specifically about ionised hypocalcemia, they then give a list of all possible causes for this condition. In order to simplify revision, a table of causes is reproduced below:
Low Parathyroid Hormone
|
High or normal Parathyroid hormone
Drugs
|
Ionised hypocalcemia in isolation is rare. It is seen in only one scenario: citrate toxicity. When citrate is used to chelate calcium, the total calcium is normal, but the ionised fraction is low. This is because measurement instruments which detect calcium will also measure citrate-calcium complexes in the serum, but the electrode which measures ionised calcium will only measure the free fraction, which decreases with citrate chelation.
Inzucchi, Silvio E. "Management of hypercalcemia." Postgraduate medicine115.5 (2004).
Ralston, S. H., et al. "Medical management of hypercalcemia." Calcified tissue international 74.1 (2004): 1-11.
Hästbacka, J., and V. Pettilä. "Prevalence and predictive value of ionized hypocalcemia among critically ill patients." Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica 47.10 (2003): 1264-1269.
LeGrand, Susan B., Dona Leskuski, and Ivan Zama. "Narrative review: furosemide for hypercalcemia: an unproven yet common practice." Annals of internal medicine 149.4 (2008): 259-263.
UpToDate has a nice summary of this topic for the paying customer.
Cooper, Mark S., and Neil JL Gittoes. "Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia." BMJ: British Medical Journal 336.7656 (2008): 1298.
Tohme, J. F., and J. P. Bilezikian. "Hypocalcemic emergencies." Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 22.2 (1993): 363-375.
Diercks, Deborah B., et al. "Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities." The Journal of emergency medicine 27.2 (2004): 153-160.
LITFL have an excellent point-form summary of citrate toxicity. Much of what we know about it is derived from the sorry experience of patients who were recipients of massive transfusions.
Uhl, L., et al. "Unexpected citrate toxicity and severe hypocalcemia during apheresis." Transfusion 37.10 (1997): 1063-1065.
Bushinsky, David A., and Rebeca D. Monk. "Calcium." The Lancet 352.9124 (1998): 306-311.
Schaer, H., and U. Bachmann. "Ionized calcium in acidosis: differential effect of hypercapnic and lactic acidosis." British journal of anaesthesia 46.11 (1974): 842-848.
Dzik, Walter H., and Scott A. Kirkley. "Citrate toxicity during massive blood transfusion." Transfusion medicine reviews 2.2 (1988): 76-94.
A 61-year-old male, due to have a colonoscopy as an out-patient, is brought into the Emergency Department on the day of the procedure having been found collapsed at home, unresponsive with increased tone in his limbs.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Normal Range |
|
Urea |
3.6 mmol/L |
2.1 – 7.1 |
|
Creatinine |
50 micromol/L* |
53 – 97 |
|
Sodium |
100 mmol/L* |
136 – 146 |
|
Potassium |
2.9 mmol/L* |
3.5 – 5.1 |
|
Chloride |
62 mmol/L* |
98 – 107 |
|
Bicarbonate |
35 mmol/L* |
22 – 32 |
|
Glucose |
5.0 mmol/L |
3.0 – 6.0 |
a) What is the likely cause of the biochemical disturbance?
b) Briefly list the steps in your immediate management.
a) Water intoxication secondary to bowel prep.
b)
Hyponatremia is discussed in greater detail elsewhere.
In this electrolyte panel, the hyponatremia is the single most deranged electrolyte, and can account for seizures, which can in turn account for the increased tone. This sort of bowel-prep-associated hyponatremia is apparently a well-known complication of outpatient colonoscopy.
There are no fancy equations to apply in order to answer this question. Judging by the college answer, the examiners were interested in the candidate's understanding of sodium replacement for symptomatic hyponatremia.
If one were to approach the answer systematically, one might write something like this:
The college answer recommends to raise the sodium by no more than 0.5mmol/hr,to avoid pontine myelinolysis. However, in their answer to the very similar Question 24 from the first paper of 2016, the college recommend to raise the sodium level by 2-4% over 30 minutes if the patient is symptomatic, i.e. confused or having seizures. This change in approach reflects a change in the multinational society recommendations: in the recent European guidelines (Spasovski et al, 2014) the guideline development group felt that the risk of brain oedema outweighs the risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome.
Frizelle, F. A., and B. M. Colls. "Hyponatremia and seizures after bowel preparation: report of three cases." Diseases of the colon & rectum 48.2 (2005): 393-396.
Salik, James M., and Paui Kurtin. "Severe hyponatremia after colonoscopy preparation in a patient with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome." The American journal of gastroenterology 80.3 (1985): 177-179.
Nagler, Jerry, David Poppers, and Meredith Turetz. "Severe hyponatremia and seizure following a polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy." Journal of clinical gastroenterology 40.6 (2006): 558-559.
Lien, Y. H., J. I. Shapiro, and L. Chan. "Study of brain electrolytes and organic osmolytes during correction of chronic hyponatremia. Implications for the pathogenesis of central pontine myelinolysis." Journal of Clinical Investigation88.1 (1991): 303.
Mohmand, Hashim K., et al. "Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection." Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2.6 (2007): 1110-1117.
Laureno, Robert, and Barbara Illowsky Karp. "Myelinolysis after correction of hyponatremia." Annals of Internal Medicine 126.1 (1997): 57-62.
A 50-year-old patient was admitted to the ICU for airway observation following a difficult parathyroidectomy. No immediate airway problems were evident. About 24 hours later, the patient was noted to be in fast atrial fibrillation, and complained of difficulty in breathing with generalised aches and pains.
a) What is the likely explanation for the patient's symptoms?
b) List your specific management for this problem.
a) Hypocalcaemia and possibly hypomagnesaemia causing muscle cramps, possible laryngospasm.
b)
Ca gluconate or chloride – bolus or infusion.
Mg supplements.
Anti-arrhythmics for AF.
That this is hypocalcemia, and that replacing calcium is the solution, does not require extensive discussion.
Post-parathyroidectomy hypocalcemia is the most likely guess for this disturbance, given that it's the complication everybody watches for whenever a patient's parathyroid glands have been surgically interfered with. It happens to some extent in over half of the patients undergoing this surgery (Mittendorf et al, 2004). Of the symptoms, the most common are "acral or perioral numbness and paresthesias, muscle cramps, or, in more severe cases, laryngeal stridor, tetany, generalized seizures, and cardiac arrhythmias". The difficulty breathing could also be pulmonary oedema. Lekas et al (2010) discussed how this might happen, pointing out the essential role of calcium in contractility and diastolic relaxation.
Hypomagnesemia after parathyroid surgery is also a thing, albeit not as well-known. Jones et al (way back in 1973) described it in a way which makes it look much like severe hypocalcemia, which it is often associated with. By treating the mganesium, the symptoms disappear even if the calcium level is ignored. "Despite persistence of severe hypocalcaemia the acute restoration of the serum magnesium level to normal with intravenous therapy was accompanied by a striking alleviation of the clinical abnormalities" the authors remark. One cannot help but think that one should still think about replacing the missing calcium anyway (for one, the blood still needs to clot somehow).
Mittendorf, Elizabeth A., James I. Merlino, and Christopher R. McHenry. "Post-Parathyroidectomy Hypocalcemia: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management/DISCUSSION." The American surgeon 70.2 (2004): 114.
Lekas, Poli, Patricia T. Goldenstein, and Joanne M. Bargman. "Myocardial dysfunction and pulmonary edema post parathyroidectomy: the role of hypocalcemia." Adv Perit Dial26.4 (2010): 125-129.
Jones, C. T., R. A. Sellwood, and J. M. Evanson. "Symptomatic hypomagnesaemia after parathyroidectomy." British Medical Journal 3.5876 (1973): 391.
You are called to review a 54-year-old female who is obtunded, 5 days post total knee replacement. She has a history of hypertension and mild depression and is on regular medication for both conditions. She has no other known co-morbidities.
Her biochemistry profile is as follows:
| Parameter | Patient Value | Normal Adult Range |
| Sodium | 114 mmol/L* | 135 – 145 |
| Potassium | 4.6 mmol/L | 3.5 – 5.0 |
| Chloride | 87 mmol/L* | 95 – 105 |
| Bicarbonate | 18 mmol/L* | 24 – 32 |
| Urea | 6.6 mmol/L | 2.9 – 8.2 |
| Creatinine | 72 µmol/L | 70 – 120 |
a) What are the likely causes for these results in this patient?
b) Briefly outline how you will determine the underlying cause.
a)
Inappropriate fluid therapy post op
SIADH (possible SSRI therapy)
Thiazide diuretic
Vomiting and/or diarrhoea
Salt-wasting (cerebral or renal)
Less likely as no other co-morbidity CCF, cirrhosis, hypoadrenalism, hypothyroidism (kidney failure
excluded from results)
b)
History of medications and fluid input/output
Clinical assessment of fluid status, presence of heart/liver failure
Serum osmolality
Urine osmolality and sodium
Random cortisol
TFTs
a)
Causes of hyponatremia in this patient could include:
In general:
|
Spurious result Isotonic
Hypertonic
|
Water retention High urine sodium
Low urine sodium
|
Sodium excretion
|
b)
An approach to the diagnosis of a hyponatremia should involve the following structured steps:
History: The following bits of historical information are important:
The following standard battery of tests can be launched; particularly if history is unhelpful, or one cannot bring oneself to interview the patient or their family.
Essential tests:
Optional tests:
Potential causes:
This is essentially the content of Box 93.1 from Anthony Delaney and Simon Finfer's chapter for Oh's Manual.
|
Spurious result Isotonic
Hypertonic
|
Water retention High urine sodium
Low urine sodium
|
Sodium excretion
|
Diagnosis on the basis of the above lab tests and historical findings:
Regarding sodium homeostasis in critically ill patients:
a) Outline the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the hyponatraemia commonly seen in hepatic and renal failure. (20% marks)
b) List the criteria essential for diagnosis of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD). (20% marks)
c) List 4 drugs from separate classes that may cause SIAD. (20% marks)
d) How would you distinguish SIAD from cerebral salt wasting syndrome (CSWS)? (20% marks)
e) List two drugs that may be useful in the management of SIAD. (20% marks)
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
1. Demeclocycline
2. Tolvaptan / Conivaptan
a) A more wordy answer as to why there is hyponatremia in hepatic and renal failure (which also works to explain CHF)
b) From the chapter on Syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH):
|
c) ibid.
|
|
|
d) How to tell SIADH from CSW? The trick is demonstrating that the extracellular fluid volume is reduced. With a reduced volume, the elevated vasopressin level is a sensible response to dehydration, whereas with volume expansion the vasopressin level is "inappropriate". Thus, the most important diagnostic criterion discriminating between SIADH and CSW is really the assessment of hydration.
In both conditions the ADH level is elevated, but only with euvolaemia is this "inappropriate" ADH seretion (and therefore it can then be called CSW). A heretical viewpoint (in which CSW does not exist) would call this SIADH with urinary sodium loss to compensate for daily maintenance intake, which gives the impression of salt wasting.
e)
Drugs for management of SIADH include the following options:
An excellent 2012 article by Peter Gross ("Clinical management of SIADH") discusses these options with satisfying detail.
Palmer, Biff F. "Hyponatremia in patients with central nervous system disease: SIADH versus CSW." Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 14.4 (2003): 182-187.
Cerdà-Esteve M, Cuadrado-Godia E, Chillaron JJ, Pont-Sunyer C, Cucurella G, Fernández M, Goday A, Cano-Pérez JF, Rodríguez-Campello A, Roquer J Cerebral salt wasting syndrome: review. .Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):249-54.
Milionis, Haralampos J., George L. Liamis, and Moses S. Elisaf. "The hyponatremic patient: a systematic approach to laboratory diagnosis."Canadian Medical Association Journal 166.8 (2002): 1056-1062.
Gross, Peter. "Clinical management of SIADH." Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism (2012): 2042018812437561.
HANTMAN, DAVID, et al. "Rapid correction of hyponatremia in the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone: an alternative treatment to hypertonic saline." Annals of Internal Medicine 78.6 (1973): 870-875.
Decaux, Guy, et al. "Treatment of the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone with furosemide." New England Journal of Medicine 304.6 (1981): 329-330.
Decaux, Guy, et al. "Treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia in the intensive care unit by urea." Critical Care 14.5 (2010): R184.
Forrest Jr, John N., et al. "Superiority of demeclocycline over lithium in the treatment of chronic syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone." New England Journal of Medicine 298.4 (1978): 173-177.
White, Martin G., and Christopher D. Fetner. "Treatment of the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone with lithium carbonate." New England Journal of Medicine 292.8 (1975): 390-392.
Rosner, Mitchell H. "Lixivaptan: a vasopressin receptor antagonist for the treatment of hyponatremia." Kidney international 82.11 (2012): 1154-1156.
Erickson, Kevin F., Glenn M. Chertow, and Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert. "Cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease." Annals of internal medicine 159.6 (2013): 382-389.
The following biochemical profile is from a 65-year-old male who has been admitted to your Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Normal Adult Range |
|||
|
Sodium |
124 mmol/L* |
135 – 145 |
|||
|
Potassium |
4.3 mmol/L |
3.2 – 4.5 |
|||
|
Chloride |
106 mmol/L |
100 – 110 |
|||
|
Bicarbonate |
23 mmol/L |
22 |
– |
27 |
|
|
Urea |
15.0 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|||
|
Creatinine |
340 |
μmol/L* |
70 |
– |
120 |
|
Glucose |
5.8 mmol/L |
3.0 – 7.0 |
|||
|
Lipase |
562 |
IU/L* |
< 220 |
||
|
Total Calcium |
2.3 mmol/L |
2.15 |
– 2.6 |
||
|
Phosphate |
1.25 mmol/L |
0.70 |
– 1.40 |
||
|
Albumin |
26 g/L* |
33 |
– |
47 |
|
|
Globulins |
35 g/L |
25 |
– |
45 |
|
|
Total Protein |
61 g/L |
60 |
– |
83 |
|
|
Total Bilirubin |
20 μmol/L |
4 – 20 |
|||
|
Conjugated Bilirubin |
4 μmol/L |
1 – 4 |
|||
|
g-Glutamyl transferase (GGT) |
6 U/L |
0 – 50 |
|||
|
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
100 |
U/L |
40 |
– |
110 |
|
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) |
380 |
U/L* |
110 – 250 |
||
|
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) |
210 |
U/L* |
< 40 |
||
|
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) |
100 |
U/L* |
< 40 |
||
|
Measured Osmolarity |
290 mOsm/kg |
280 – 300 |
|||
What blood test would you now order?
Give your reasoning. (30% marks)
Lipid profile.
The patient has low serum sodium but a normal measured osmolarity and hence has pseudohyponatraemia. His glucose and protein levels are not elevated. He therefore is likely to have hypertriglyceridemia, which may be the underlying cause of his pancreatitis.
Additional Examiners’ Comments:
20.4 was the least well answered section with many candidates failing to recognise pseudohyponatraemia.
20.4 was the "least well answered section" because it was poorly worded, not because the candidates could not recognise hyponatremia. To ask" what test would you now order" is like asking "guess what the examiner is thinking".
However, the savvy candidate would have noticed a measured osmolality being offered.
They never give you a measured osmolality unless they expect you to do something with it.
The combination of a normal-ish osmolality and hyponatremia immediately rings alarm bells. Under virtually no conditions is hyponatremia iso-osmolar; the usual pattern is for the osmolality to drop as well as the sodium. An isoosmolar hyponatremia can only be one of two things, high triglycerides or high protein. Of these, the protein is available, and is normal - ergo, triglycerides are to blame.
It might seem that the historical tidbit about pancreatitis is virtually without purpose in this context. However, a specific literature reference for the importance of recognising pseudohyponatremia is offered in the 1985 article by Howard et al. Six cases of hyperlipaemic pancreatitis are presented. Of the six patients, one was mistakenly resuscitated with hypertonic saline, with intracerebrally disastrous consequences.
So, what is the actual sodium level? You can calculate that. Fortgens and Pillay offer the following equation to correct sodium:
\("Correct" Na^+ = {"incorrect" Na^+ \times 0.93 \over [99.1 - (0.001 \times [lipid, mg/dL) - (0.7 \times protein, g/dL)] \div 100 }\)
If one plays with this equation, one finds that the effect of lipids on serum sodium measurement is actually rather trivial. For every 10g/L of triglycerides, the sodium level decreases only by 0.84 mmol/L. Thus, in order to be hiding a truly lifethreatening hypernatremia (eg. 150mmol/L), the patient in the college's case study would have to have a serum triglyceride level of 190g/L.
In other words, each litre of blood would have to be be 20% fat by weight. According to the Guiness Book of Records, the highest serum trigluceride level recorded belonged to Terry Culton (USA), who had a triglyceride reading of 3165 mg/dl, or 31.65g/L. This is clearly not much of a record, as the commenters on that page report their own horrific lipid levels as high as 9000 mg/dL, or 90g/L - which is not quite 20% w/v, but still enough to cause a significant sodium drop.
Interestingly, it is important to note that even though the old flame photometry method was the main source of this "pseudohyponatremia" in the pre-1990s literature, m modern analysers are not completely spared. Modern high-volume pathology labs use various variants of ion-selective electrodes in automated analysers which should theoretically be immune to this error. The “direct” method, anyway, is immune (that is where the ISE membrane comes into direct contact with whole blood, like in an ABG analyser). However, those automated machines typically use the “indirect” method (because it prolongs ISE membrane life). This involves taking the patient’s blood, centrifuging out the red cells, and then diluting the plasma (usually by a factor of 10). This is the step which introduces a dilution error. Because the sodium is confined to the water volume in the sample, any dilution by a fixed amount will decrease the measured sodium concentration.
LADENSON, JACK H., FRED S. APPLE, and DAVID D. KOCH. "Misleading hyponatremia due to hyperlipemia: a method-dependent error." Annals of internal medicine 95.6 (1981): 707-708.
Howard, John M., and Jordan Reed. "Pseudohyponatremia in Acute Hyperlipemic Pancreatitis: A Potential Pitfall in Therapy." Archives of Surgery 120.9 (1985): 1053-1055.
Fortgens, Philip, and Tahir S. Pillay. "Pseudohyponatremia revisited: a modern-day pitfall." Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 135.4 (2011): 516-519.
With respect to hyponatraemia:
a) Outline the classification and underlying causes. (50% marks)
a) Outline the specific treatment of severe hyponatraemia (i.e. sodium level < 120 mmol/L and/or associated with significant adverse symptoms). (50% marks)
a)
Classify hyponatraemia:
Further subdivide hypotonic:
Serum Na+ < 135 mmol/L
|
What is serum osmolality? |
||
|
Low (< 285 mOsm/kg) |
Normal (285 – 295 mOsm/kg) |
High (> 295 mOsm/kg) |
|
Pseudohyponatraemia Hyperlipidaemia Hyperproteinaemia |
Hyperglycaemia Hypertonic infusions Mannitol Glucose |
|
|
What is volume status? |
||
|
What is urinary [Na+]? |
||
|
< 20 mmol/L |
> 20 mmol/L |
|
|
Hypovolaemic |
Vomiting Diarrhoea Skin losses excess sweating 3rd space losses Burns Pancreatitis |
Obstruction Diuretics Renal tubular acidosis Adrenal insufficiency |
|
Normovolaemic |
Water intoxication Decreased solute intake |
Renal failure Hypothyroidism Adrenal insufficiency SIADH Cerebral salt wasting |
|
Hypervolaemic |
Cirrhosis Heart failure Nephrotic syndrome |
Acute renal failure Chronic renal failure |
b)
Management is divided into
Emergency treatment of sodium level
If the patient is symptomatic, then the serum sodium level needs to be urgently elevated by approximately 2- 4% e.g. 2.5 – 5 mmol/L (these are rough figures).
This is done by giving a specific sodium dose, which is usually in the form of hypertonic saline (e.g. 3%) to avoid any more excess water, over a brief period e.g. 30 minutes.
It is calculated by the following formula.
Sodium dose = Total body water x desired change in sodium level
For example in a 70 kg man, a total of 200 ml of 3% saline will raise the serum sodium by 2.5 mmol/L
Short-term sodium management
Once symptoms have resolved, the aim is to correct the sodium level by roughly 0.5 – 1.0 mmol/L per hour over the next 24 hours. And how this is done depends on the underlying cause.
Specific treatment of underlying cause:
a)
Mindlessly regurgitate the hyponatremia algorithm? Don't mind if I do. This is the "classical" approach:
In word form:
b)
In the management of severe (symptomatic) hyponatremia, the college were clearly after some sort of hypertonic saline protocol. The fact that the hyponatremia is being described as "severe" and "symptomatic" suggests that simple fluid restriction was not going to cut it. However, the alternative smust be mentioned. Thus:
Where it comes to a discussion of hyptertonic saline, the college recommend rapid corection of symptomatic hyponatremia, which is followed by slow correction of asymptomatic hyponatremia. This is consistent with the recent European guidelines (Spasovski et al, 2014). The guideline development group felt that the risk of brain oedema outweighs the risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome. Specifically, they recommend the infusion of 150ml of 3% saline over 20 minutes, then checking the sodium, and then repeating the infusion.
Spasovski, Goce, et al. "Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia." European Journal of Endocrinology 170.3 (2014): G1-G47.
David M., Arnold S. Berns, and Anthony D. Ivankovich. "Isotonic hyponatremia following transurethral prostate resection." Journal of clinical anesthesia 2.1 (1990): 48-53.
A 52-year-old male with a history of chronic alcohol abuse was brought to the Emergency Department with a reported change in his mental state for 3 - 4 days. He was drowsy and lethargic but communicated appropriately when roused. He did not appear dehydrated . The following are his blood results on presentation:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Normal Adult Range |
||
|
Sodium |
116 mmol/L* |
135 - 145 |
||
|
Potassium |
2.9 mmol/L* |
3.5 - 5.0 |
||
|
Chloride |
67 mmol/L* |
95 - 110 |
||
|
Bicarbonate |
14 mmol/L* |
22 - 32 |
||
|
Urea |
2.9 mmol/L* |
3.0 - 8.0 |
||
|
Creatinine |
46 umol/L |
45 - 90 |
||
|
Glucose |
6.8 mmol/L |
3.5 - 7.8 |
||
|
Phosphate |
0.60 mmol/L* |
0.65 - 1.45 |
||
|
Maqnesium |
0.51 mmol/L* |
0.70 - 1.05 |
||
|
Calcium adjusted |
2.31 mmol/L |
2.10 - 2.60 |
||
|
Albumin |
34 q/L* |
36 - 52 |
||
|
Bilirubin total |
13 umol/L |
< 18 |
||
|
Alanine aminotransferase |
67 U/L* |
< 35 |
||
|
Asoartate transaminase |
80 U/L* |
< 40 |
||
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
148 U/L* |
30 - 110 |
||
|
y-Glutamyl transferase |
480 U/L* |
< 40 |
||
|
Lipase |
492 U/L* |
< 95 |
||
|
Amylase |
189 U/L* |
< 130 |
||
|
Free T4 |
14.2 omol/L |
12.0 - 31.0 |
||
|
Thyroid stimulatinq hormone |
0.65 mU/L |
0.50 - 5.00 |
||
|
Cortisol |
1440 nmol/L* |
150 - 700 |
||
|
B-Hvdroxvbutyrate |
4.4 mmol/L* |
< 0.4 |
||
|
Osmolality |
254 mOsm/L* |
275 - 295 |
||
|
Urine Chemistrv |
||||
|
Sodium |
< 20 mmol/L |
|||
|
Potassium |
37 mmol/L |
|||
|
Osmolality |
198 mOsm/L |
|||
a) Give the likely diagnosis with the rationale for your decision. (25% marks)
b) Briefly outline your management of the hyponatraemia in this patient. (20% marks)
a) Beer potomania (alcoholic intoxication / ketoacidosis acceptable)
History
Abnormal LFTs with predominantly raised GGT
Acidosis with elevated BOHB with normal glucose Low urine osmolality
Normal endocrine profile
b) Likely chronic hyponatraemia so replace slowly < 10 mmol/24 hrs Stop non-essential fluids
At risk of seizures from alcohol withdrawal
Let us analyse the results in some detail.
This guy is a drinker, and his GGT is elevated, so... he has been drinking.
After a few days of decreased level of consciousness he is not dehydrated, so ... he has been drinking a lot.
The bloods demonstrate hypoosmolar hyponatremia with a low usine osmolality and a low urine sodium. There are only a few conditions which can give rise to this:
Beer potomania is a case of dietary solute deficiency. Your water intake is excessive, but you eat virtually nothing containing salt. Lets say you are a degenerate beer-fiend, and your total nutritional intake consists of carbohydrate-rich, sodium-poor beer. Vast volumes are happily ingested. The carbohydrate from the beer is metabolised preferentially, leading to a suppression of protein catabolism. Low protein catabolism results in low urea levels, and with the sodium dropping, what solute can you excrete? None. The volume of urine drops. Each day you will excrete as little as 4 litres of maximally dilute urine. Obviously if you drink more than 4 litres of beer a day, hyponatremia will ensue. This phenomenon is not limited to American college students; ovolactovegetarians and people trying to lose weight too fast are also susceptible.
Hariprasad MK, Eisinger RP, Nadler IM, Padmanabhan CS, Nidus BD. Hyponatremia in psychogenic polydipsia. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Dec;140(12):1639-42.
Hilden T, Svendsen TL. Electrolyte disturbances in beer drinkers. A specific "hypo-osmolality syndrome". Lancet. 1975 Aug 9;2(7928):245-6.
Thaler SM, Teitelbaum I, Berl T. "Beer potomania" in non-beer drinkers: effect of low dietary solute intake. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jun;31(6):1028-31.
Fox BD.Crash diet potomania. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):942.
The following results are from a 29-year-old post-partum female, day 6 following elective Caesarean section at 37 weeks gestation for placenta accreta, complicated by massive intra-operative haemorrhage.
She made a good recovery but has had a persisting dull headache, dizziness, lethargy, polyuria and failure of lactation.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Normal Adult Range |
|
Sodium |
114 mmol/L* |
135 - 145 |
|
Potassium |
4.6 mmol/L |
3.5 - 5.0 |
|
Bicarbonate |
26 mmol/L |
22 - 32 |
|
Urea |
2.2 mmol/L* |
3.0 - 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
46 mmol/L |
45 - 90 |
|
Serum osmolalitv |
232 mOsm/L* |
275 - 295 |
|
Urine osmolality |
493 mOsm/L |
|
a) Give the diagnosis for this clinical picture. (20% marks)
b) How will you confirm the diagnosis? (20% marks)
c) Outline the underlying pathophysiology of this condition. (20% marks)
d) What is your immediate treatment? (10% marks)
a) Sheehan's syndrome.
b) MRI brain showing empty pituitary fossa
Hormone profile – cortisol, TFTs, prolactin
c) Ischaemic pituitary necrosis due to severe post-partum haemorrhage. Vasospasm, thrombosis and vascular compression of hypophyseal arteries with an enlarged pituitary gland and DIC are possible factors.
d) Hydrocortisone.
a) This is a hypoosmolar hyponatremia with history of polyuria, failure of lactation, and lethargy. All sounds very endocrine. Given the history of pospartum haemorrhage, one must consider post-partum hypopituitarism, or Sheehan' syndrome.
b) Endocrine-sounding tests are in order.
c) The pituitary gland in pregnancy is enlarged, and in context of haemorrhagic shock it can become infarcted. As a result of this:
d) Supplement the following:
Cukierman, Ronit L., et al. "Post-Partum Hyponatraemia in the Setting of Massive Haemorrhage: An Unusual Presentation of Sheehan? s Syndrome." Critical Care Obstetrics and Gynecology (2016).
The following venous blood results are from a 56-year-old patient presenting with abdominal pain.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
|
Sodium |
130 mmol/L' |
135 - 145 |
|
|
Potassium |
5.1mmol/L |
3.5 - 5.0 |
|
|
Chloride |
101 mmol/L |
95 - 105 |
|
|
Bicarbonate |
10 mmol/L |
22 - 28 |
|
|
Creatinine |
305 umol/L |
50 - 100 |
|
|
Urea |
75.6 mmol/L* |
3.5 - 7.2 |
|
|
Glucose |
5.2 mmol/L |
3.5 - 6.0 |
|
|
Calcium corrected |
2.05 mmol/L* |
2.12 -2.62 |
|
|
Ionized Calcium |
0.97 mmol/L* |
1.14 -1.30 |
|
|
Phosphate |
3.97 mmol/L* |
0.73 - 1.37 |
|
|
Protein |
66 g/L - |
61 - 83 |
|
|
Albumin |
29 g/L* |
35 - 50 |
|
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
220 U/L• |
30 - 110 |
|
|
y-Glutamyl transferase |
30 U/L |
< 40 |
|
|
Alanine transferase |
27 U/L |
< 35 |
|
|
Magnesium |
0.83 mmol/L |
0.75 -0.95 |
|
Interpret the biochemical results, giving underlying reasons to explain the abnormalities.
(40% marks)
• Chronic renal failure with secondary hyperparathyroidism
• Elevated urea and creatinine
• Decreased calcium, raised ALP and phosphate
• Dehydration or GI bleed
• Raised U:Cr
• Mixed HAGMA and NAGMA
• Low HCO3 and delta ratio >1
• Chronic renal failure (uraemia and RTA)
• Acute on chronic renal failure (sepsis, dehydration, GI bleed etc.)
(Other reasonable explanations were accepted.)
Let us dissect these results systematically:
The college do not ask for a diagnosis.
With respect to the use of hypertonic saline (HTS} in the critically ill, list the indications, mechanisms of action and outline the supporting evidence as well as the potential adverse effects.
The main indications for the use of hypertonic saline in the critically ill are:
Osmotherapy to manage intracranial hypertension
Correction of (symptomatic) hyponatraemia.
Fluid resuscitation in hypovolaemic shock (uncommon)
Burns resuscitation
Has been used in tricyclic poisoning
Mucolytic in nebulized form – e.g. for cystic fibrosis, induced sputum sample, used in bronchiolitis with positive trial evidence
The range of concentrations of HTS used clinically varies from 1.8 – 30%. Needs to be given via central venous access
Mechanisms of action
• Marked osmotic shift of fluid from the intracellular to the interstitial and intravascular space.
• Reverses the increase in endothelial cell volume in shock and ischaemia, limiting capillary leak.
• Plasma viscosity is reduced by increased water content improving blood flow.
• Hypertonicity has a direct relaxant effect on vascular smooth muscle. End result is increased capillary blood flow. This may help counteract vasospasm in SAH.
• HTS induced increase in intravascular volume leads to an autoregulatory reduction in intracerebral blood volume.
• Increased cardiac output – increased preload, reduced PVR and SVR and reduced myocyte oedema.
• Immuno-modulatory effects and reduction of intestinal apoptosis in haemorrhagic shock
Potential adverse effects
Hypernatraemia
Acute hyperosmolar state
• Osmotic demyelination syndrome
• Acute heart failure
• Pulmonary oedema
• Hyperchloraemic acidosis
• Hyperosmolar renal failure
• Dilutional coagulopathy
Theoretical risks
• Increased rate of blood loss secondary to rapid volume expansion
• Reverse osmosis phenomenon in disrupted blood brain barrier with worsening cerebral oedema
• Severely dehydrated risk of worsening cellular dehydration
• Acute cerebral dehydration potentially result in shearing on bridging vessels and SAH
Most of these risks are theoretical or can be avoided by careful use in patients with hyponatraemia and monitoring
Evidence supporting use of HTS
Fluid resuscitation
Studies evaluating HTS in resuscitation in various shock states have shown benefit in outcomes including blood pressure, fluid balance and mortality. Comparison is difficult as different concentrations of HTS used, different case mix and other methodological issues.
Concerns about potential of HTS to increase bleeding have not been proven.
Overall HTS seems effective in increasing blood pressure in haemorrhagic shock. Its use in other forms of shock is not so well supported.
Osmotherapy to control ICH
Studies have evaluated HTS in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage and used as either 7.5% boluses or 3% continuous infusions and HTS appears to be effective in reducing ICP. No evidence to suggest a better neurological outcome or survival benefit.
Summary of clinical use
Note: This template was long and complex and candidates were not expected to cover all the points in order to pass.
The potential adverse effects of hypertonic saline are common to all (or, most) of its various uses. These are listed in a nice review of 3% saline among neuroICU patients where a nice table (Table 1) lists the potential adverse effects of hypertonic saline administration. I will reproduce the relevant parts of this table below.
As for the indications mechanisms and evidence, this answer would certainly work well as a table, if only there were fewer columns. Fortunately, with the right monitor DerangedPhysiology is 1200 pixels wide.
| Mechanism | Evidence | Advantages and disadvantages |
| As sodium replacement, for hyponatremia: | ||
|
Replacement of the missing ion |
The recent overview of published guidelines by Verbalis et al (2014) covers the recommendations for the use of hypertonic saline in symptomatic hyponatremia. |
Ideal when fluid restriction is needed, eg. in SIADH. Not ideal in situations where hypovolemia accompanies hyponatremia, i.e. when volume as well as sodium need to be replaced. |
| As osmotherapy, for raised ICP: | ||
| Osmotic dehydration of brain tissue |
The (2016) publication of the BTF Guidelines was unable to make a firm recommendation in favour of hypertonic saline. A reasonably recent review (Lazarides et al, 2013) found a small statistically significant benefit for its use, as compared to mannitol. |
Cheap, stable in storage, very rapid effect. At least as potent as mannitol when it comes to reducing ICP Less potential for hypovolemia than with mannitol Safe endpoint (serum sodium around 145-155) is easily monitored with serial ABGs. Needs central venous access, and should not be used if the patient is chronically hyponatremic |
| As a resuscitation fluid for shock: | ||
| Increased preload, some vasoactive properties |
Poor quality data in support (Oliveira et al , 2002). No benefit in sepsis Poor quality data and no benefit in trauma (de Crescenzo et al, 2017) |
Smaller volume means less haemodilution (in trauma for example) Small volume also means a more neutral fluid balance All the haemodynamic and immunomodulatory benefits should also be helpful |
| For management of tissue oedema: | ||
| Improved diuresis |
Paterna et al (2011) found some benefit in CCF patients. Evidence is inconsistent and based on small scale studies. |
Improved fluid balance Potentially, better cardiac function May be frustrated by activation of the RAAS. |
| For cystic fibrosis, as an expectorant and mucolytic: | ||
| Multiple mechanisms |
Osmotic hydration of the mucus layer (i.e. attracting water into it) and disruption of mucus proteins. Recommended for CF patients who can tolerate it (Elkins and Bye 2011) Not very well investigated in other groups, eg. COPD |
It's irritant, which the patients will not appreciate; but this promotes cough and improves secretion clearance Routine frequent use may result in systemic absorption of sodium and chloride, which might not be desirable. |
Lazaridis, Christos, et al. "High-Osmolarity Saline in Neurocritical Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*." Critical care medicine 41.5 (2013): 1353-1360.
Strandvik, G. F. "Hypertonic saline in critical care: a review of the literature and guidelines for use in hypotensive states and raised intracranial pressure." Anaesthesia 64.9 (2009): 990-1003.
Holmes, J. A. "Therapeutic Uses Of Hypertonic Saline In The Critically Ill Emergency Department Patient." EM Critical Care 3.1 (2013).
Oliveira, Roselaine P., et al. "Clinical review: Hypertonic saline resuscitation in sepsis." Critical care 6.5 (2002): 418.
Asfar, Pierre, et al. "Hyperoxia and hypertonic saline in patients with septic shock (HYPERS2S): a two-by-two factorial, multicentre, randomised, clinical trial." The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 5.3 (2017): 180-190.
Pfortmueller, Carmen Andrea, and Joerg C. Schefold. "Hypertonic saline in critical illness-A systematic review." Journal of Critical Care 42 (2017): 168-177.
Paterna, Salvatore, et al. "Short-term effects of hypertonic saline solution in acute heart failure and long-term effects of a moderate sodium restriction in patients with compensated heart failure with New York Heart Association class III (Class C)(SMAC-HF Study)." The American journal of the medical sciences 342.1 (2011): 27-37.
De Crescenzo, Claire, et al. "Prehospital hypertonic fluid resuscitation for trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 82.5 (2017): 956-962.
Gunn, Mark L., et al. "Prospective, randomized trial of hypertonic sodium lactate versus lactated Ringer's solution for burn shock resuscitation." Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 29.9 (1989): 1261-1267.
Elkins, Mark R., and Peter TP Bye. "Mechanisms and applications of hypertonic saline." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine104.1_suppl (2011): 2-5.
A 47-year-old, previously well, 70 kg male was admitted to the Emergency Department with agitation and confusion. Following catheterisation, his urine output in the next few hours was 300 — 350 ml/hr. The results of his blood tests are as follows:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
169 mmol/L* |
135 - 145 |
|
Potassium |
4.6 mmol/L 105 mmol/L |
|
|
Chloride |
95 - 105 |
|
|
Bicarbonate |
26.0 mmol/L |
22.0 - 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
6.6 mmoI/L* |
|
|
Urea |
9.6 mmol/L* | |
|
Creatinine |
115 prnoI/L* |
45 — 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.88 mmol/L |
0.75 - 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
28 g/L* |
35 - 50 |
|
Protein |
58 g/L* |
60 - 80 |
|
Plasma osmolality |
360 mmol/kg* |
290 - 310 |
|
Urine specific gravity |
1.005* |
1 .010 - 1.030 |
a) What is the most likely diagnosis? (10% marks)
b) How would you manage the hypernatremia? (30% marks)
a)
Diabetes Insipidus
b)
Examiner Comments:
Management of diabetes insipidus was handled poorly, as some of the described fluid regimes were considered dangerous
The major abnormalities are:
This is clearly diabetes insipidus. The urine findings and and the low osmolar gap rule out the interference of things like mannitol.
Management of diabetes insipidus consists of two major strategies:
1) Correct the water balance.
2) Interrupt the pathophysiology
Singer, Irwin, James R. Oster, and Lawrence M. Fishman. "The management of diabetes insipidus in adults." Archives of internal medicine 157.12 (1997): 1293-1301.
Libber, Samuel, Harold Harrison, and David Spector. "Treatment of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors." The Journal of pediatrics108.2 (1986): 305-311.
Knoers, N., and L. A. H. Monnens. "Amiloride-hydrochlorothiazide versus indomethacin-hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." The Journal of pediatrics 117.3 (1990): 499-502.
A 44-year-old patient is admitted post thyroidectomy for Graves’ disease. Seven years ago, she had gastric bypass surgery for obesity. Shortly after admission, her serum biochemical findings are:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
136 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
5.0 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
103 mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
23.0 mmol/L |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
5.8 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
80 μmol/L |
45 – 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.60 mmol/L* |
0.75 – 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
35 g/L |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
74 g/L |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
12 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) |
34 U/L |
< 35 |
|
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) |
40 U/L* |
< 35 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
188 U/L* |
30 – 110 |
|
γ-Glutamyl transferase (GGT) |
45 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Calcium corrected |
1.80 mmol/L* |
2.12 – 2.62 |
|
Phosphate |
0.7 mmol/L* |
0.8 – 1.5 |
a) Give two potential explanations for the abnormalities seen.
Vit. D deficiency
Hypoparathyroidism
b) What clinical features might be associated with these abnormalities
Hypocalcaemia is classically associated with
Paraesthesias in perioral and acral areas
Chvostek and Trosseau’s signs
Muscle cramps, laryngeal spasm
Irritability, confusion, seizures
Prolonged QT, arrhythmias
Hypomagnesaemia – some of above, also muscle weakness
Hypophosphatemia – mild, unlikely to be associated with clinical features
c) Briefly describe how you will manage this condition
IV Cal chloride or gluconate, IV Magnesium PO4 replacement
Monitor ionised Ca level, if available. Check ECG for prolonged QT
Avoid alkalosis – as it worsens neuromuscular irritability
Oral Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) as soon as oral intake is allowed
Oral Cal supplement (up to 1.5 – 2.0 grams/day) – preferable as Ca citrate Not Ca carbonate Oral Magnesium supplements
If recalcitrant hypoCa, consider s/c parathyroid hormone (confirm adequate vit D level)
Check TFT, TSH – replacement T4 as needed.
Unlike a normal data interpretation question which asks the candidate to mindlessly produce a shopping list of abnormalities, this one expects a little more. The shopping list and salient features from the question are:
The thyroidectomy story raises the possibility of hypoparathyroidism, which is an easy mark. To produce another differential, one might need to think somewhat laterally. Possibilities relevant to this case might include:
More remote possibilities may include:
Clinical features, they ask?
Mild hypocalcemia
|
Severe hypocalcemia
|
|
Symptoms Physical signs
|
ECG changes
Associated biochemical abnormalities
|
|
Neurological manifestations
Cardiovascular manifestations
Biochemical abnormalities
|
Musculoskeletal manifestations
Haematological abnormalities
|
Management of hypocalcemia might seem as straightforward as replacing the calcium, but the college examiners make the fair point that this process can be more involved and occasionally requires extra thinking. A structured approach might resemble the following, which was borrowed from an excellent article by Cooper and Gittoes (2008):
Acute replacement
Medium term replacement
So, what might one do if in spite of ongoing calcium infusion the ionised calcium keeps dropping? That would probably be the "recalcitrant hypoCa" described by the examiners, who were presumably too busy to type "hypocalcemia" for the purposes of this model answer. "Recalcitrant hypoCa" is actually a real phenomenon which tends to occur in patients who have previously had gastric bypass procedures (Moore et al, 2013), as the patient in this question has done. It has no scientific definition, but some authors (eg. Ballal et al, 2017) seem to characterise it as a hypocalcemia which fails to respond to either vitamin D supplementation or intravenous calcium. Therre arre some treatment options open to these people:
Cooper, Mark S., and Neil JL Gittoes. "Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia." BMJ 336.7656 (2008): 1298-1302.
Wang, Haiyuan, Peter Bua, and Jillian Capodice. "A comparative study of calcium absorption following a single serving administration of calcium carbonate powder versus calcium citrate tablets in healthy premenopausal women." Food & nutrition research 58.1 (2014): 23229.
McKenzie, Travis J., et al. "Recalcitrant hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass." Surgery 154.6 (2013): 1300-1306.
Ballal, Devesh Sanjeev, et al. "Persistent recalcitrant hypocalcemia following total thyroidectomy: a management challenge." Malta Medical Journal 29.02 (2017).
Bo-Linn, George W., et al. "An evaluation of the importance of gastric acid secretion in the absorption of dietary calcium." The Journal of clinical investigation 73.3 (1984): 640-647.
A 69-year-old male with a history of previous pneumonectomy for lung carcinoma, is admitted with confusion. There are no focal neurological signs on clinical examination. Neck stiffness is not present. Contrast CT brain scan is normal. His initial plasma biochemistry is shown below:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Na+ |
148 mmol/L* |
134 – 145 |
|
K+ |
3.7 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Cl- |
109 mmol/L* |
97 – 107 |
|
HCO3- |
33 mmol/L |
24 – 34 |
|
Albumin |
15 g/L* |
35 – 40 |
|
Urea |
12.8 mmol/L* |
3.1 – 8.1 |
|
Creatinine |
36 µmol/L* |
60 – 100 |
|
Total calcium |
2.59 mmol/L* |
2.20 – 2.55 |
|
Phosphate |
0.86 mmol/L |
0.78 – 1.05 |
a) What is the most likely cause of the confusion in this patent, based on the above information? Justify your response. (10% marks)
b) List four therapies for the cause stated in a). (20% marks)
a) Hypercalcemia (When corrected for albumin the true calcium is higher).
b) Calciuresis (saline +/- frusemide)
• Bisphosphonates
• Calcitonin
• Corticosteroids
• NSAIDS
• Mithramycin
a)
To use a formula first described by Payne et al (1973):
Corrected calcium = (0.02 × (normal albumin - patient's albumin)) + serum calcium
Thus, (0.02 × (40 - 15)) + 2.59 = 3.09mmol/L.
However, one needs to seriously question this value, and the use of the term "true calcium" to describe it. This 3.09 mmol/L is not the One True Calcium. The patient's actual serum calcium level is still the one reported in the blood results; it's not as if hypoalbuminaemia causes your blood sample to magically hide 0.50 mmol/L of calcium, and only to reveal them when the intensivist chants the appropriate incantations. The calcium value corrected for low albumin is a mathematical workaround from an era when calcium ion-selective electrodes were not widely available. Payne's formula calculates the calcium level your patient would have if their albumin were normal, so you can decide whether their ionised calcium might be high. Again, this is not a "true" calcium by any means. The patient's blood does not actually contain this much calcium. A much better calculation would have been to use an equation such as the ones tested by Mateu-de Antonio (2016), which use albumin and total calcium measurements to predict the ionised calcium value:
Ca2+ = 0.813 × CaTot0.5 - 0.006 × Alb0.75 + 0.079
(where albumin is represented in g/L).
Thus, in this case, ionised calcium would be (0.813 × 2.590.5 - 0.006 × 150.75 + 0.079) = 1.34 mmol/L, which is a mild hypercalcemia- elevated but potentially asymptomatic.
b)
In brief, these are the physiological aims for management of hypercalcemia, and the means to achieve them:
Mateu-de Antonio, Javier. "New predictive equations for serum ionized calcium in hospitalized patients." Medical Principles and Practice 25.3 (2016): 219-226.
Payne, R. B., et al. "Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins." British medical journal 4.5893 (1973): 643.
Stewart, Andrew F. "Hypercalcemia associated with cancer." New England Journal of Medicine 352.4 (2005): 373-379.
Zawada Jr, E. T., D. B. Lee, and C. R. Kleeman. "Causes of hypercalcemia."Postgraduate medicine 66.4 (1979): 91-7.
A 55-year-old male with a history of significant alcohol intake presents with a 2-week history of lethargy. He takes no regular medications and has no other medical disorders. Clinically, he appears malnourished and euvolaemic. Investigations reveal the following:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Blood Results: |
||
|
Na+ |
115 mmol/L* |
134 – 143 |
|
K+ |
3.7 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Cl- |
80 mmol/L* |
97 – 107 |
|
HCO3- |
22 mmol/L* |
24 – 34 |
|
Urea |
3.0 mmol/L* |
3.1 – 8.1 |
|
Creatinine |
46 µmol/L* |
50 – 90 |
|
Glucose |
4.1 mmol/L* |
4.4 – 6.8 |
|
Osmolality |
241 mmol/kg* |
271 – 289 |
|
Urine Results: |
||
|
Na+ |
10 mmol/L |
10 – 20 |
|
Osmolality |
53 mmol/kg |
40 – 1200 |
a) What is the most likely cause of the hyponatraemia? (15% marks)
a) Water intoxication/Beer potomania
Key features here are "degenerate alcoholic" "malnutrition" and "euvolaemia". The undoubtedly vast intake of alcohol consists of essentially just water, as the alcohol is readily metabolised into CO2 and H2O. The resulting water excess produces a hypoosmolar hyponatremia which remains euvolemic for as long as the drinking continues. The low urine sodium and minimal urinary osmolality (the lowest value possible is around 40 mmol/kg) suggests that the kidneys are responsibly retaining sodium and doing their best to dump water.
Apart from beer potomania and psychogenic polydipsia, this sort of thing can develop in case of a reset osmostat (eg. in old age), during pregnancy, and in people who embark upon weird crash diets.
Hariprasad MK, Eisinger RP, Nadler IM, Padmanabhan CS, Nidus BD. Hyponatremia in psychogenic polydipsia. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Dec;140(12):1639-42.
Hilden T, Svendsen TL. Electrolyte disturbances in beer drinkers. A specific "hypo-osmolality syndrome". Lancet. 1975 Aug 9;2(7928):245-6.
Thaler SM, Teitelbaum I, Berl T. "Beer potomania" in non-beer drinkers: effect of low dietary solute intake. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jun;31(6):1028-31.
Fox BD.Crash diet potomania. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):942.
Lipschutz JH, Arieff AI. Reset osmostat in a healthy patient. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 1;120(7):574-6
A 76-year-old female presents with seizures. She takes no regular medications. On examination she weighs 60 kg, has no evidence of cardiac failure or liver disease, and appears euvolaemic. Her results in the Emergency Department reveal the following:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Blood Results: |
||
|
Na+ |
110 mmol/L* |
134 – 143 |
|
K+ |
3.8 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Cl- |
81 mmol/L* |
97 – 107 |
|
HCO3- |
24 mmol/L |
24 – 34 |
|
Urea |
5.7 mmol/L |
3.1 – 8.1 |
|
Creatinine |
36 mmol/L* |
50 – 90 |
|
Osmolality |
237 mmol/kg* |
274 – 289 |
|
Urine Results: |
||
|
Na+ |
23 mmol/L* |
10 – 20 |
|
Osmolality |
488 mmol/kg |
40 – 1200 |
a) SIADH
b) (An answer between 300 - 360 mmol was acceptable).
(Sodium deficit = TBW x (desired Na - Actual Na)
= 0.5/0.6 x 60 x (120-110)
= 30/36 x 10
= 300/360
This is a hypoosmolar hyponatremia with concentrated urine and a high urine sodium. The college also told us the patient was euvolaemic. There are several possibilities which do not fit the scenario:
It could still be
These are less likely from the history; which is to say, if the college had wanted you to go down that road, they'd have given you red flags for myxoedema like hypothermia and bradycardia. SIADH is chosen by the examiners probably because cerebral salt wasting (the other possible cause of this electrolyte pattern) is less likely in somebody who has not had a severe head injury or intracranial haemorrhage.
For a diagnosis of SIADH, one needs to have:
So, most of these are covered in the provided material.
As for the calculation of the sodium deficit:
Sodium deficit = 0.6 ×body weight × (desired concentration - current concentration)
The multiplier of body weight is 0.6 for men and 0.5 for women (whose fraction of body water is smaller). For this elderly 60kg woman, assuming you want to get her back to a sodium level of 135mmol/L the equation calls for 30L × 10mmol = 300 mmol of sodium.
Spasovski, Goce, et al. "Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia." European Journal of Endocrinology 170.3 (2014): G1-G47.
Milionis, Haralampos J., George L. Liamis, and Moses S. Elisaf. "The hyponatremic patient: a systematic approach to laboratory diagnosis."Canadian Medical Association Journal 166.8 (2002): 1056-1062.
A 54-year-old male presents with septic shock requiring vasopressor support and continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (AKI).
His blood tests on presentation show:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
FiO2 |
0.4 |
|
|
pH |
7.15* |
7.35 – 7.45 |
|
pO2 |
146.0 mmHg (19.5 kPa) |
|
|
pCO2 |
42.0 mmHg (5.6 kPa) |
35.0 – 45.0 (4.6 – 6.0) |
|
SpO2 |
98% |
|
|
Bicarbonate |
14.0 mmol/L* |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Base Excess |
-13.6 mmol/L* |
-2.0 – +2.0 |
|
Lactate |
1.4 mmol/L |
0.5 – 1.6 |
|
Sodium |
104 mmol/L* |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
4.0 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
73 mmol/L* |
95 – 105 |
|
Glucose |
4.1 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
35.6 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
947 µmol/L* |
45 – 90 |
|
Albumin |
28 g/L* |
35 – 50 |
a)
Patient is hyponatraemic (duration unknown) -concern about rapid correction of Na causing osmotic demyelination syndrome (although uraemia may be protective) – should be aiming for 6-8 mmol/24 hrs which may be problematic if using standard bags (with normal Na levels) for CRRT as correction may occur more rapidly
b)
Examiners Comments:
Part c - a lot of candidates focussed on the urea and potential disequilibrium syndrome rather than the far more concerning hypoatraemia and potential OSM.
Interestingly, this ABG question did not specifically require the trainee to interpret the findings, which made it a time-wasting honeypot for people who did not read the question properly.
There is really not much to add to the college answer here. In essence, the standard dialysate which contains 145 mmol/L will correct this patient's sodium way too quickly. In fact, according to Bender et al (1998) standard IHD dialysis can raise the sodium by 5mmol/L per every hour of a 4-hour session. Obviously that's not ideal, and some strategies are required to keep the patient from developing osmotic demyelination.
Of all the possible resources to answer this question, the article by Rosner & Connor (2018) is so good that one might think one of the examiners has a subscription to th Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. In short, the possible methods of mitigating the risk of myelinolysis in a hyponatremic dialysis patient are:
Zepeda-Orozco, Diana, and Raymond Quigley. "Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome." Pediatric nephrology 27.12 (2012): 2205-2211.
Arieff, Allen I., et al. "Brain water and electrolyte metabolism in uremia: effects of slow and rapid hemodialysis." Kidney international 4.3 (1973): 177-187.
Bender, Filitsa H. "Successful treatment of severe hyponatremia in a patient with renal failure using continuous venovenous hemodialysis." American journal of kidney diseases 32.5 (1998): 829-831.
Wendland, Erik M., and Andre A. Kaplan. "A Proposed Approach to the Dialysis Prescription in Severely Hyponatremic Patients with End‐Stage Renal Disease." Seminars in dialysis. Vol. 25. No. 1. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2012.
Rosner, Mitchell H., and Michael J. Connor. "Management of severe hyponatremia with continuous renal replacement therapies." Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 13.5 (2018): 787-789.
A 62-year-old female with a history of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is admitted to your ICU for monitoring after an orthopaedic procedure. The results of her routine post-operative blood tests are given below:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
144 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
4.0 mmol/L |
3.5 – 4.5 |
|
Bicarbonate |
24 mmol/L |
22 – 26 |
|
Urea |
8.7 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
88 μmol/L |
45 – 90 |
|
Total Calcium |
3.00 mmol/L* |
2.15 – 2.55 |
(20% marks)
a)
Note 1) and 2) are the two commonest causes accounting for 90% cases. 0.5 mark for each of these
For the two other causes, any of:
Or any other recognised cause consistent with the stem.
b)
What are the most likely causes of this hypercalcemia? What do we know about the patient?
The OSA story begs the question, is a large thyroid gland or retrosternal goitre causing the obstruction? Even weirder is the association between OSA and raised PTH levels, thought to be due to Vitamin D deficiency (Krasimirova et al, 2017). Anyway: the college examiners, in a rare paroxysm of assessment transparency, offered us the marking rubric for this question, and they clearly wanted the trainees to unfocus from the question stem and just give the most common community-prevalent causes of hypercalcemia. In fact, in their 2003 article, Carroll & Schade specifically state that "primary hyperparathyroidism and malignancy account for more than 90 percent of hypercalcemia cases". Other possible causes are listed below:
|
Primary endocrine causes
Paraneoplastic causes
|
Granulomatous disease
Drug-induced hypercalcemia
Random miscellaneous causes
|
To order an ionised calcium level is reasonable, because this may reveal the true extent of the hypercalcemia (for instance, if the patient has little albumin on board, the majority of this "total" calcium will be in an ionised form, and the symptoms will be worse).
Additionally, the following investigations might be useful:
UpToDate has a nice chapter on this topic, for the paying customer.
Krasimirova, Daniela, et al. "Parathyroid Hormone and Vitamin D Levels in Obstructive Sleep Apnea." (2017): PA2335.
Carroll, Marry F., and David S. Schade. "A practical approach to hypercalcemia." American family physician 67.9 (2003): 1959-1966.
Stewart, Andrew F. "Hypercalcemia associated with cancer." New England Journal of Medicine 352.4 (2005): 373-379.
Zawada Jr, E. T., D. B. Lee, and C. R. Kleeman. "Causes of hypercalcemia."Postgraduate medicine 66.4 (1979): 91-7.
The following results were obtained from a 62-year-old female one week following a subarachnoid haemorrhage with increasing confusion:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
130 mmol/L* |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
4.0 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
96 mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
26.5 mmol/L* |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
2.5 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
37 μmol/L* |
45 – 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.87 mmol/L |
0.75 – 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
33 g/L* |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
74 g/L |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
10 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Alanine transferase |
26 U/L |
< 35 |
|
Serum Osmolality |
274 mosm/kg* |
285 – 295 |
|
Ionised calcium |
1.19 mmol/L |
1.10 – 1.35 |
|
Calcium corrected |
2.34 mmol/L |
2.12 – 2.62 |
|
Phosphate |
0.97 mmol/L |
0.80 – 1.50 |
a) What are the two most likely causes for this biochemical profile? (10% marks)
b) How would you distinguish between the two biochemically and clinically? (30% marks)
Not available.
What we are seeing here is a patient with recent CNS pathology who has now developed
The two most likely causes of this biochemical profile would surely have to be endocrine, and related to the SAH. Of these the two natural possibilities are:
Hypoadrenalism (due to pituitary dysfunction) is an alternative, and one could also make the argument that any pituitary injury from SAH that is bad enough to cause hypoadrenalism would probably also cause hypothyroidism. However SIADH and CSW are by far more likely. The way to discriminate between these lies in being able to demonstrate that the body fluid volume is decreased.
a) What do you understand by the term ‘balanced crystalloid solution’? (10% marks)
b) Compare and contrast the constituents of normal saline and any one balanced crystalloid solution. (20% marks)
c) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of balanced crystalloid solutions and normal saline in the fluid management of diabetic ketoacidosis. (70% marks)
Not available.
a) "Balanced crystalloids have a sodium, potassium, and chloride content closer to that of extracellular fluid and, when given intravenously, have fewer adverse effects on acid–base balance." Semler & Kellum, 2019
b)
Any from the broad range of available balanced crystalloids should have been appropriate here, and the real trick would have been to remember the exact goddamn numbers for the chloride and sodium concentrations. The table presented here (cut-and-pasted from Semler & Kellum) is available for reference.
| Fluid | Sodium | Potassium | Calcium | Magnesium | Chloride | Acetate | Gluconate | Malate | Lactate | Osmolarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 135–145 | 4.5–5.0 | 2.2–2.6 | 0.8–1.0 | 94–111 | 0.02–0.2 | 1–2 | 275–295 | ||
| Plasma-Lyte A | 140 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 98 | 27 | 23 | 294 | |||
| Normosol-R | 140 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 98 | 27 | 23 | 295 | |||
| Isolyte S | 141 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 98 | 27 | 23 | 295 | |||
| Ringer’s acetate | 145 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 127 | 24 | 5 | 309 | ||
| Lactated Ringer’s | 130 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 109 | 28 | 273 | ||||
| Hartmann’s solution | 131 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 112 | 28 | 280 | ||||
| 0.9% sodium chloride | 154 | 154 | 308 |
c) Advantages and disadvantages of normal saline and balanced crystalloid in the management of DKA:
You could have answered this as a table, or as a set of pointform notes. Observe:
| Normal saline | Balanced crystalloid | |
| Advantages |
|
|
| Disadvantages |
|
|
Or, in point form:
Semler, Matthew W., and John A. Kellum. "Balanced crystalloid solutions." American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 199.8 (2019): 952-960.
Curran, Jeffrey D., et al. "Comparison of Balanced Crystalloid Solutions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Critical care explorations 3.5 (2021).
WIGGINS, WALTER S., et al. "The effect of salt loading and salt depletion on renal function and electrolyte excretion in man." Circulation 3.2 (1951): 275-281.
Hobensack, Michael. "Clinical Effects of Balanced Crystalloids vs Saline in Adults with Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Self WH, Evans CS, Jenkins CA, et al. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3 (11): e2024596." Journal of Emergency Medicine 60.4 (2021): 578-579.
Lopes, Anselmo Dantas, Alexandre Toledo Maciel, and Marcelo Park. "Evolutive physicochemical characterization of diabetic ketoacidosis in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit." Journal of critical care 26.3 (2011): 303-310.
Okuda, Y. U. K. I. C. H. I., et al. "Counterproductive effects of sodium bicarbonate in diabetic ketoacidosis." The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 81.1 (1996): 314-320.
Wilcox, Christopher S. "Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride." The Journal of clinical investigation 71.3 (1983): 726-735.
Chua, Horng-Ruey, et al. "Plasma-Lyte 148 vs 0.9% saline for fluid resuscitation in diabetic ketoacidosis." Journal of critical care 27.2 (2012): 138-145.
Self, Wesley H., et al. "Clinical effects of balanced crystalloids vs saline in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis: a subgroup analysis of cluster randomized clinical trials." JAMA network open 3.11 (2020): e2024596-e2024596.
Williams, Vijai, et al. "0.9% saline versus Plasma-Lyte as initial fluid in children with diabetic ketoacidosis (SPinK trial): a double-blind randomized controlled trial." Critical Care 24.1 (2020): 1-10.
A 27-year-old patient presents with the following laboratory results after a prolonged sub-acute illness.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
132 mmol/L* |
135 – 150 |
|
Potassium |
2.2 mmol/L* |
3.5 – 5.5 |
|
Chloride |
94 mmol/L* |
100 – 110 |
|
Bicarbonate |
28 mmol/L* |
22 – 27 |
|
Urea |
8.3 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
236 μmol/L* |
70 – 120 |
|
Total Calcium |
5.04 mmol/L* |
2.15 – 2.60 |
|
Ionised Calcium |
2.6 mmol/L* |
1.1 – 1.3 |
|
Magnesium |
0.7 mmol/L |
0.7 – 1.1 |
|
Phosphate |
1.09 mmol/L |
0.70 – 1.40 |
|
Albumin |
37 g/L |
35 – 47 |
|
Total Bilirubin |
8 μmol/L |
4 – 20 |
|
g-Glutamyl transferase |
105 U/L* |
0 – 50 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
263 U/L* |
40 – 110 |
|
Alanine transferase |
76 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Aspartate transferase |
48 U/L* |
< 40 |
a) List the ECG changes associated with the most striking biochemical abnormalities. (10% marks)
b) List three differential diagnoses. (15% marks)
c) List three management strategies. (15% marks)
Not available.
a)
The biochemical abnormalities which are the most "striking" here are the hypokalemia and hypercalcemia.
b)
What could be happening here? And more importantly, what meaning can we scry from the decision to call this illness both "prolonged" and "sub-acute"? It sometimes helps to itemise the abnormalities. They are:
So:
c)
List three management strategies. But for which disorder? You have three differential diagnoses. Do they mean a management strategy for each of the differentials, or three management strategies for the most likely differential? In which case, what if you chose poorly? Reader, it is safest to assume that the severe hypercalcemia is what they were asking about here, considering that the management strategies for the hypokalemia will largely consist of potassium replacement, and to test this spinal reflex couldn't possibly have been the objective of a final-level exam question.
So, the management options for hypercalcemia are:
Riccardi, Daniela, and Edward M. Brown. "Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium-sensing receptor in the kidney." American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 298.3 (2010): F485-F499.
Beall, Douglas P., et al. "Milk-alkali syndrome: a historical review and description of the modern version of the syndrome." The American journal of the medical sciences 331.5 (2006): 233-242.
Van Der Plas, W. Y., et al. "Secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism: a narrative review." Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 109.4 (2020): 271-278.
Bukowczan, J., et al. "Gitelman’s syndrome presenting with hypercalcaemia due to severe primary hyperparathyroidism." Endocrine Abstracts. Vol. 29. Bioscientifica, 2012.
The following blood gas was taken from a 35-year-old patient who presented with weakness and lethargy.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal range |
|
pH |
7.49* |
7.35 – 7.45 |
|
pO2 |
85 mmHg (11.3 kPa) |
|
|
pCO2 |
35 mmHg (4.7 kPa) |
35 – 45 (4.7 – 6.0) |
|
Standard bicarbonate |
28 mmol/L |
22 – 29 |
|
Base excess |
4 mmol/L* |
-3 to +3 |
|
Sodium |
148 mmol/L* |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
1.8 mmol/L* |
3.5 – 5.2 |
|
Ionised Calcium |
1.09 mmol/L* |
1.15 – 1.30 |
|
Chloride |
111 mmol/L* |
95 – 110 |
|
Glucose |
9.1 mmol/L |
4.0 – 11.0 |
|
Lactate |
1.2 mmol/L |
0.5 – 1.3 |
|
Creatinine |
63 µmol/L |
45 – 90 |
a) List the important biochemical abnormalities and show calculations where appropriate. (25% marks)
b) List three clinical scenarios, which may produce this pattern of abnormalities.
(15% marks)
Not available.
In detail:
So: the pattern of abnormalities is:
The hypokalemia is by far the worst of them, which leaves the trainee to sift through their mental silo of causes of hypokalemia, finding ones associated with enough of the other findings. These could be:
The BSL is given as slightly high, which would exclude things like insulinoma.
Glover, P. "Hypokalaemia." Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 239-251.
Gennari, F. John. "Hypokalemia." New England Journal of Medicine 339.7 (1998): 451-458.
Assadi, Farahnak. "Diagnosis of hypokalemia: a problem-solving approach to clinical cases." Iranian journal of kidney diseases 2.3 (2008): 115-122.
A 52-year-old patient is admitted to your ICU with a World Federation of Neurosurgeons (WFNS) Grade IV subarachnoid hemorrhage following a cerebral aneurysmal bleed. On day four of admission, you note the patient has become hyponatraemic (Na+ 126 mmol/L).
a) List six differential diagnoses of the acute hyponatraemia. Indicate the most likely diagnosis. (30% marks)
b) Outline your principles of management for this level of hyponatraemia, and your specific management based on the most likely diagnoses. (70% marks)
Not available.
The possibilities are:
Of these, SIADH is probably the most common, and therefore the most likely. Kao et al (2009) looked at the records of about 300 SAH patients with hyponatremia, and found that 34.5% had SIADH, whereas only 23% had cerebral salt wasting. Marupudi & Mittal (2015) mention that this inappropriate ADH excess is usually the result of direct stimulation of the hypothalamus by the subarachnoid blood.
What would you do about this?
Well: you can't just leave it and monitor it as you might in a stable ward patient, as this is somebody with SAH, and for these people, hyponatremia is associated with a poor outcome. The problem is, whereas normally you would fluid-restrict these patients, in this scenario you wouldn't want to do that, because hypovolemia promotes vasospasm. Thus, you're forced to replace the sodium intravenously, while maintaining a high or normal fluid balance.
Interestingly, this fill-and-season strategy is also exactly what you would do for cerebral salt wasting anyway, as it is a syndrome characterised by volume loss as well as sodium loss, which means you really don't need to choose between these differentials in the setting of SAH.
Marupudi, Neena I., and Sandeep Mittal. "Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage." Journal of clinical medicine 4.4 (2015): 756-767.
Kao, Lily, et al. "Prevalence and clinical demographics of cerebral salt wasting in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage." Pituitary 12.4 (2009): 347-351.
You are attending a Rapid Response/ MET call.
The patient is a 67-year-old male with no previous past medical history who underwent a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) 4 hours ago. He became confused postoperatively and now has a tonic-clonic seizure.
a) List three likely causes of seizures in this situation. (15% marks)
b) Outline your assessment and management plan, from the time of the tonic-clonic seizure to ICU admission. (85% marks)
Focus of the question was hyponatraemia due to TURP syndrome, with resulting neurological symptoms and seizure. Marks were weighted towards specific management, those who scored well specified the treatment and targets for sodium correction in addition to general response to a seizure on the ward, and specified indications for intubation and CT brain in this context. Some candidates appeared to misunderstand the pathogeneses of TURP syndrome and discussed glycine toxicity and hyperammonaemia interchangeably within the answer.
a) "List three likely causes" sounds a lot like "guess what I'm thinking" but in all fairness the scenario as it has been presented does certainly send the mind into specific tunnels, and a predictable list of options does emerge if you think about it.
TURP syndrome is just the iso-osmolar (or mildly hypo-osmolar) hyponatremia that develops as the result of absorbing a large amount of glycine-rich irrigation fluid. The glycine keeps the body fluids relatively iso-osmolar, so any osmolality measurements that are performed will be close to normal - usual glycine solutions are slightly hypotonic (200 mOsm/kg), so osmolality does drop, just not as much as one might expect from the drop in the sodium. Yes, the sodium drop can be substantial, and seizures/coma/death may certainly result. As totally distinct from this, glycine toxicity results from metabolism of glycine by oxidative deamination, and can result in a massive excess of ammonia; which is what the examiners are talking about at the end of their comments. Still, glycine toxicity is thought to be a major contributor to the overall morbidity of TURP syndrome, so it is weird for the examiners to assert a separation between these two pathophysiologies.
b), "assessment and management plan, from the time of the tonic-clonic seizure to ICU admission" sounds dangerously like a stem that ends up producing answers with stereotypical motherhood statements about simultaneous assessment and resuscitation, two large bore cannulas, and so on. It does appear that the college wanted some of that generic material in the answer ("general response to a seizure on the ward, and specified indications for intubation and CT brain" were expected). On the basis of these considerations, a competent answer would have probably looked like this:
Spasovski, Goce, et al. "Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia." European Journal of Endocrinology 170.3 (2014): G1-G47.
Rhymer, J. C., et al. "Hyponatraemia following transurethral resection of the prostate." British journal of urology 57.4 (1985): 450-452.
Vijayan, Senthilkumar. "TURP syndrome." Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 1.1 (2011): 46-50.
With respect to wound infections in patients with thermal injuries (burns), discuss under the following headings:
a) Risk factors (10% marks)
b) Local signs (30% marks)
c) Systemic features (20% marks)
d) Diagnostic challenges (40% marks)
Most marks were allocated to part d), and most candidates included the difficulty differentiating infection from SIRS and contamination from infection, however, this was the usual extent of the answer. Candidates should use the associated marking allocation throughout the question, to guide them to the breadth and depth of answers required
With the exception of those who have worked in burns units, the trainees would have found themselves adrift here, unless they had purposefully read about this topic during their preparation.
Is this a "burns" question or an "infectious diseases" question? Well. If this were a question about fluid resuscitation in the burns patient, would it end up in the "fluids and electrolytes" section? The thermal injury is the unique aspect here, not the film of Pseudomonas. Ergo, it was grouped with the other burns-related questions.
a) Risk factors:
b) Local signs:
c) Systemic features:
d) Diagnostic challenges:
Schultz, Laura, et al. "Identification of predictors of early infection in acute burn patients." Burns 39.7 (2013): 1355-1366.
Lago, Kathryn, et al. "Difficult to treat infections in the burn patient." Surgical infections 22.1 (2021): 95-102.
American Burn Association Consensus Conference on Burn Sepsis and Infection Group, et al. "American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns." Journal of burn care & research 28.6 (2007): 776-790.
Compare and contrast central and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.
Please tabulate your answer under the following headings: definition, etiology, clinical features, investigations, and specific management.
(100% marks)
Aim: To explore the clinical entities of Diabetes Insipidus.
Key sources include: Paper 2015.1 Q29, CanMEDS Medical Expert.
Discussion: This question is similar in content to the previously published SAQ. Candidates did well if they were able to demonstrate the pathophysiology particularly in nephrogenic DI.
There was a knowledge gap for many candidates. Management of sodium issues, the requirement for paired serum and urine samples and a discussion of correction strategies of water/sodium balance were contained in the better answers.
Generic answers that did not address the headings asked or omitted specific details of the investigations and rationale were unsuccessful. To improve the answers, familiarity with the Glossary of terms using compare and contrast to state how the aetiology and clinical features are different between the two pathologies.
Question 29 from the first paper of 2015 was actually about SIADH and cerebral salt wasting, rather than diabetes insipidus. Still, it's all sodium, innit. The historical SAQs interrogating the trainee's understanding of DI were Question 5.2 from the first paper of 2018 and Question 17 from the first paper of 2018, in both of which investigations and management were expected. This "compare and contrast" question does work best as a table, and the examiners specifically asked you to tabulate your answer and gave you the headings, so there's probably no excuse for failing to use that structure:
| Heading | Central DI | Nephrogenic DI |
| Definition |
|
|
| Aetiology |
|
|
| Features |
|
|
| Investigations |
Diagnosis of DI:
Discrimination between different causes of DI:
|
|
| Management |
|
|
Makaryus, Amgad N., and Samy I. McFarlane. "Diabetes insipidus: diagnosis and treatment of a complex disease." Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 73.1 (2006): 65.
Bendz, Hans, and Mattias Aurell. "Drug-induced diabetes insipidus: incidence, prevention and management." Drug safety 21.6 (1999): 449-456.
Christ-Crain, Mirjam, et al. "Diabetes insipidus." Nature reviews Disease primers 5.1 (2019): 54.
Pivonello, Rosario, et al. "Central diabetes insipidus and autoimmunity: relationship between the occurrence of antibodies to arginine vasopressin-secreting cells and clinical, immunological, and radiological features in a large cohort of patients with central diabetes insipidus of known and unknown etiology." The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 88.4 (2003): 1629-1636.
Ananthakrishnan, Sonia. "Gestational diabetes insipidus: diagnosis and management." Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 34.5 (2020): 101384.
Khositseth, Sookkasem, et al. "Hypercalcemia induces targeted autophagic degradation of aquaporin-2 at the onset of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Kidney international 91.5 (2017): 1070-1087.
Khositseth, Sookkasem, et al. "Autophagic degradation of aquaporin-2 is an early event in hypokalemia-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Scientific reports 5.1 (2015): 18311.
A 65-year-old patient is admitted to the ICU post excision of craniopharyngioma. Explain the following blood results, showing your calculations in your answer. (15% marks)
|
Plasma Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
154* mmol/L |
135-145 |
|
Potassium |
3.6 mmol/L |
3.5-5.0 |
|
Urea |
2.7* mmol/L |
3.0-8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
37* umol/L |
45-90 |
|
Glucose |
8* mmol/L |
3.5-6.0 |
|
Urine Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
36* mmol/l |
20 |
|
Osmolality |
133 mOsm/Kg |
50-1200 |
Aim: To allow the candidate to demonstrate expertise in data interpretation.
Key sources include: Common clinical practice with urinalysis, and paired urine and serum samples. CanMEDS Medical Expert.
Discussion:
Candidates are encouraged to read the question carefully and refer to the glossary of terms to focus their answers, candidates who explained the abnormalities instead of just listing the abnormalities gave more fulsome answers and were marked accordingly. Calculations were asked for and therefore if a calculated serum osmolality was present, it was marked higher than answers without a calculation. .
A calculation was called for, but of what? Puzzling over this, the only thing one can consider calculating is the serum osmolality, which would be
= (2 × Na) + Urea + Glucose = 318.7
From this, we can then surmise that the patient has central DI, because the craniopharyngioma surgery has resulted in some damage to the posterior pituitary. Of course, one can also say this on the basis of the high serum sodium and low urine osmolality alone, but the extra step was clearly required by the examiners.
A 45-year-old patient presented to the emergency department with a five-day history of nausea and vomiting and one day of slurred speech. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) was suspected due to sodium level of 110 mmol/l.
a) List five alternative differential diagnosis in this patient with severe hyponatremia, and a high urine sodium and osmolality? (25% marks)
b) Outline the management principles for the use of hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) in symptomatic acute hyponatremia and include the calculations in your answer. (50% marks)
c) List five risk factors for development of osmotic demyelination syndrome. (25% marks)
Aim: To explore the candidate knowledge of SIADH and allow the candidate to display familiarity with the clinical use of 3% saline.
Key sources include: Paper 2009.1 Q14.4, 2017.2 Q5, CanMEDS Medical Expert.
Discussion. The successful candidate in part a was able to list differential diagnoses for severe hyponatraemia AND a high urinary sodium and osmolality as requested. Candidates scored less marks if they listed general causes of hyponatraemia.
Calculations were asked for in part b and candidates who provided an estimation of the sodium deficit and calculated the amount of 3% saline required to correct it scored highly. The expert pass commented on rates of administration, provided rationale behind the recommendations, and provided safe guidelines for sodium correction over 24 hours in the context of the acute symptomatology. Many candidates were unable to list five risk factors for part c. This may be due to a knowledge deficit or misreading of the question. Candidates are reminded to read the questions carefully and attempt to answer every question.
The college refer to Question 14.4 from the first paper of 2009, which asked about the calculation of a sodium deficit, and Question 5 from the second paper of 2017, which was all about the use of hypertonic saline.
a)
The lazy man's classification of sodium disturbances was basically designed to answer this sort of differential-generating exercise. The stem of the question gives you nausea vomiting and slurred speech, which might either indicate that the examiners wanted you to suspect hypovolemia, or to explain why the hypertonic saline is indicated (symptomatic hyponatremia), or to suggest that some sort of sinister intracranial horror is quietly lurking. so, the list of differentials would therefore incorporate:
b)
The question on the management principles for the use of hypertonic saline in this case contains a landmine, the word "acute" nestled in among all the other stem verbiage. This SAQ is specifically asking about the management of acute symptomatic hyponatremia, which requires emergency sodium replacement at a rate which is higher than what you would normally be comfortable with, to rapidly elevate the sodium to something like 115-120.
The management principles can be boiled down to this:
c)
Risk factors for osmotic demyelination include:
Lee, Jennifer Ji Young, et al. "Management of hyponatremia." Canadian Medical Association Journal 186.8 (2014): E281-E286.
Lazaridis, Christos, et al. "High-Osmolarity Saline in Neurocritical Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*." Critical care medicine 41.5 (2013): 1353-1360.
R J Martin Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: the osmotic demyelination syndromes J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:iii22-iii28 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.045906
Spasovski, Goce, et al. "Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia." European Journal of Endocrinology 170.3 (2014): G1-G47.
Adrogue, H. J., and N. E. Madias. "Aiding fluid prescription for the dysnatremias." Intensive care medicine 23 (1997): 309-316.
A 52-year-old patient with a history of chronic alcohol abuse was brought to the Emergency Department with a reported change in mental state for 3 – 4 days. They were drowsy and lethargic but communicated appropriately when roused. They did not appear dehydrated. The following are the blood results on presentation:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Normal Adult Range |
|
Sodium |
116 mmol/L* |
135-145 |
|
Potassium |
2.9 mmol/L* |
3.5-5.0 |
|
Chloride |
67 mmol/L* |
95-110 |
|
Bicarbonate |
14 mmol/L* |
22-32 |
|
Urea |
2.9 mmol/L* |
3.0-8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
46 µmol/L |
45-90 |
|
Glucose |
6.8 mmol/L |
3.5-6 |
|
Phosphate |
0.60 mmol/L* |
0.65-1.45 |
|
Magnesium |
0.51 mmol/L* |
0.70-1.05 |
|
Calcium adjusted |
2.31 mmol/L |
2.10-2.60 |
|
Albumin |
34 g/L* |
36-52 |
|
Bilirubin total |
13 mmol/L |
< 18 |
|
Alanine aminotransferase |
67 U/L* |
< 35 |
|
Aspartate transaminase |
80 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
148 U/L* |
30-110 |
|
g-Glutamyl transferase |
480 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Lipase |
492 U/L* |
< 95 |
|
Amylase |
189 U/L* |
< 130 |
|
Free T4 |
14.2 pmol/L |
12.0-31.0 |
|
Thyroid stimulating hormone |
0.65 mU/L |
0.50-5.00 |
|
Cortisol |
1440 nmol/L* |
150-700 |
|
b-Hydroxybutyrate |
4.4 mmol/L* |
< 0.4 |
|
Osmolality |
254 mOsm/kg* |
275-295 |
|
Urine Chemistry |
||
|
Sodium |
< 20 mmol/L |
|
|
Potassium |
37 mmol/L |
|
|
Osmolality |
198 mOsm/kg |
|
23.2.1 List the likely diagnosis with the rationale for your decision. (2.5 marks)
23.2.2 Briefly outline your management of the hyponatraemia in this patient. (2 marks)
Syllabus topic/section:
2.1.14 Environmental Injuries and Toxicology in ICU – L1.
2.1.21 Applied Pharmacology in Intensive Care.
Aim:
To explore the understanding of data interpretation, toxidromes and management of dysnatraemias.
Discussion:
Overall, this question scored highly but the answers were not as well structured as the other data question 19. Some candidates missed parts of the question, which was really the only way to 'fail' this repeat data interpretation. The management of hyponatraemia was frequently muddled by candidates with many stressing that the correction must be slow but then giving both a fluid restriction and iv hypertonic saline or normal saline. These candidates appeared to have remembered parts of the management but not fully applied it correctly.
Quite right, this should have been hard to fail. Assessment drives learning, which means 99% of CICM exam candidates will be able to confidently make the diagnosis of pyroglutamic acidosis, and certainly all of them can interpret the absolute bejeesus out of sodium results, as hyponatremia questions have been repeated abundantly in historical exams. This SAQ is a repeat of Question 13.2 from the second paper of 2016, and what follows is a direct copy of the discussion section from 2016.
Let us analyse the results in some detail.
This guy is a drinker, and his GGT is elevated, so... he has been drinking.
After a few days of decreased level of consciousness he is not dehydrated, so ... he has been drinking a lot.
The bloods demonstrate hypoosmolar hyponatremia with a low usine osmolality and a low urine sodium. There are only a few conditions which can give rise to this:
- Beer potomania
- Psychogenic polydipsia
- Excess 5% dextrose administration (psychogenic polydipsia by proxy, you might say)
Beer potomania is a case of dietary solute deficiency. Your water intake is excessive, but you eat virtually nothing containing salt. Lets say you are a degenerate beer-fiend, and your total nutritional intake consists of carbohydrate-rich, sodium-poor beer. Vast volumes are happily ingested. The carbohydrate from the beer is metabolised preferentially, leading to a suppression of protein catabolism. Low protein catabolism results in low urea levels, and with the sodium dropping, what solute can you excrete? None. The volume of urine drops. Each day you will excrete as little as 4 litres of maximally dilute urine. Obviously if you drink more than 4 litres of beer a day, hyponatremia will ensue. This phenomenon is not limited to American college students; ovolactovegetarians and people trying to lose weight too fast are also susceptible.
This was the second question in the SAQ, but this time it was presented as the first in the series of three, and the question asks your to "list" the diagnosis rather than to "give" it, in order to maintain a predictable consistency with the college exam vocabulary.
Hariprasad MK, Eisinger RP, Nadler IM, Padmanabhan CS, Nidus BD. Hyponatremia in psychogenic polydipsia. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Dec;140(12):1639-42.
Hilden T, Svendsen TL. Electrolyte disturbances in beer drinkers. A specific "hypo-osmolality syndrome". Lancet. 1975 Aug 9;2(7928):245-6.
Thaler SM, Teitelbaum I, Berl T. "Beer potomania" in non-beer drinkers: effect of low dietary solute intake. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jun;31(6):1028-31.
Fox BD.Crash diet potomania. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):942.
A 44-year-old patient is admitted post thyroidectomy for Graves’ disease. Seven years ago, the patient had gastric bypass surgery for obesity. Shortly after admission, the serum biochemical findings are:
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
136 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
5.0 mmol/L |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
103 mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
23.0 mmol/L |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
5.8 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
80 μmol/L |
45 – 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.60 mmol/L* |
0.75 – 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
35 g/L |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
74 g/L |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
12 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) |
34 U/L |
< 35 |
|
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) |
40 U/L* |
< 35 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
188 U/L* |
30 – 110 |
|
γ-Glutamyl transferase (GGT) |
45 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Calcium corrected |
1.80 mmol/L* |
2.12 – 2.62 |
|
Phosphate |
0.7 mmol/L* |
0.8 – 1.5 |
a) List two potential explanations for the abnormalities seen. (1 mark)
b) List the clinical features which may be associated with these abnormalities? (2 marks)
c) Outline your specific management of the biochemical abnormalities. (3 marks)
Syllabus topic/section:
2.1.7 Renal Intensive Care / Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders. L1
Discussion:
This is a core knowledge question which was generally answered well. This is an SAQ with simple lists of hypo and hypercalcaemia issues to complete. Candidates are reminded to only list the number of things asked for. If more than a stipulated number of responses is given (for example part b) asks for three differentials) the examiner will only mark the top three. It is not the responsibility of the examiner to pick the most appropriate of the answers given. This is a requirement of the candidate.
Several candidates omitted part/all of the question. Consider time management strategies to optimise the opportunity to address every question with enough time. We recommend practicing timed answers and practicing answering more than one SAQ consecutively during your preparation.
This is a deliberately timed examination designed to test recall and prioritisation as these are transferrable skills to senior, independent Intensive Care clinical practice. Every question is important for overall success. Candidates who have allocated enough time to address every question of the written paper have a statistically significant higher chance of successful participation and are more likely to be able to demonstrate the standard required on the journey to becoming a transitional fellow of the CICM
To go through this in detail:
So, there is hypomagnesemia, hypophosphataemia, hypocalcemia. Possible explanations for this include:
B) clinical features will mostly be those of hypocalcemia:
The magnesium and phosphate are not low enough to cause clinical features
c) Management, for 3 marks, consists mostly of:
Acute replacement
Medium term replacement
Refractory hypocalcemia
Vetter, Thorsten, and Martin J. Lohse. "Magnesium and the parathyroid." Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 11.4 (2002): 403-410.
Sutton, R. A. L. "Plasma magnesium concentration in primary hyperparathyroidism." Br Med J 1.5695 (1970): 529-533.
King, R. G., and S. W. Stanbury. "Magnesium metabolism in primary hyperparathyroidism." Clinical Science 39.2 (1970): 281-303.
Hardwick, Laurie L., et al. "Magnesium absorption: mechanisms and the influence of vitamin D, calcium and phosphate." The Journal of nutrition 121.1 (1991): 13-23.
Moe, Sharon M. "Disorders involving calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium." Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 35.2 (2008): 215-237.
Cooper, Mark S., and Neil JL Gittoes. "Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia." BMJ: British Medical Journal 336.7656 (2008): 1298.
Tohme, J. F., and J. P. Bilezikian. "Hypocalcemic emergencies." Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 22.2 (1993): 363-375.
Wang, Haiyuan, Peter Bua, and Jillian Capodice. "A comparative study of calcium absorption following a single serving administration of calcium carbonate powder versus calcium citrate tablets in healthy premenopausal women." Food & nutrition research 58.1 (2014): 23229.
McKenzie, Travis J., et al. "Recalcitrant hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass." Surgery 154.6 (2013): 1300-1306.
A 27-year-old patient presents with the following laboratory results after a prolonged sub-acute illness.
|
Parameter |
Patient Value |
Adult Normal Range |
|
Sodium |
132 mmol/L* |
135 – 150 |
|
Potassium |
2.2 mmol/L* |
3.5 – 5.5 |
|
Chloride |
94 mmol/L* |
100 – 110 |
|
Bicarbonate |
28 mmol/L* |
22 – 27 |
|
Urea |
8.3 mmol/L* |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
236 μmol/L* |
70 – 120 |
|
Total Calcium |
5.04 mmol/L* |
2.15 – 2.60 |
|
Ionised Calcium |
2.6 mmol/L* |
1.1 – 1.3 |
|
Magnesium |
0.7 mmol/L |
0.7 – 1.1 |
|
Phosphate |
1.09 mmol/L |
0.70 – 1.40 |
|
Albumin |
37 g/L |
35 – 47 |
|
Total Bilirubin |
8 μmol/L |
4 – 20 |
|
g-Glutamyl transferase |
105 U/L* |
0 – 50 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
263 U/L* |
40 – 110 |
|
Alanine transferase |
76 U/L* |
< 40 |
|
Aspartate transferase |
48 U/L* |
< 40 |
a) List the ECG changes associated with the most striking biochemical abnormalities. (1 mark)
b) List three differential diagnoses. (1.5 marks)
c) List three specific management strategies. (1.5 marks)
Syllabus topic/section:
2.1.7 Renal Intensive Care / Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders. L1
Discussion:
This is a core knowledge question which was generally answered well. This is an SAQ with simple lists of hypo and hypercalcaemia issues to complete. Candidates are reminded to only list the number of things asked for. If more than a stipulated number of responses is given (for example part b) asks for three differentials) the examiner will only mark the top three. It is not the responsibility of the examiner to pick the most appropriate of the answers given. This is a requirement of the candidate.
Several candidates omitted part/all of the question. Consider time management strategies to optimise the opportunity to address every question with enough time. We recommend practicing timed answers and practicing answering more than one SAQ consecutively during your preparation.
This is a deliberately timed examination designed to test recall and prioritisation as these are transferrable skills to senior, independent Intensive Care clinical practice. Every question is important for overall success. Candidates who have allocated enough time to address every question of the written paper have a statistically significant higher chance of successful participation and are more likely to be able to demonstrate the standard required on the journey to becoming a transitional fellow of the CICM
The most "striking" abnormalities? Would those be the values which are the furthest from their normal values? In which case that would be the creatinine, which is about five times higher than what it should be, for a young person. But one must conceded that the intention of this stem is clearly to draw attention to the calcium. To be fair, it's more than just a bit high. The potassium is also far from normal. Moreover the creatinine would not cause ECG changes.
In short:
ECG changes of hypokalemia
Ventricular tachycardia: classically, torsades de pointes
b) Differentials:
c) Management of hypercalcemia:
Glover, P. "Hypokalaemia." Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 239-251.
Gennari, F. John. "Hypokalemia." New England Journal of Medicine 339.7 (1998): 451-458.
Weiner, I. David, and Charles S. Wingo. "Hypokalemia--consequences, causes, and correction." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 8.7 (1997): 1179-1188.
Shane, Elizabeth, and I. Dinaz. "Hypercalcemia: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, differential diagnosis, and management." Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Favus MJ (ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams &Wilkins (1999): 183-87.
Edelson, Gary W., and Michael Kleerekoper. "Hypercalcemic crisis." The Medical Clinics of North America 79.1 (1995): 79-92.
Carrol, Mary F., and David S. Schade. "A practical approach to hypercalcemia." Am Fam Physician 67 (2003): 1959-1966.
An elderly patient with a recently normal echocardiogram is admitted to hospital for investigation of falls and progressive functional decline. Two days later the patient is referred to the ICU with hypoxia, tachypnoea and clinical features of congestive cardiac failure.
The biochemistry is as follows:
|
Parameter |
Patient |
Reference |
|
Sodium |
144 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
3.1 mmol/L * |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
102 mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
21 mmol/L * |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
3.9 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
1.4 mmol/L * |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
29 μmol/L * |
45 – 90 |
|
Magnesium |
0.65 mmol/L * |
0.75 – 0.95 |
|
Albumin |
14 g/L * |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
59 g/L * |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
4 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Aspartate transferase (AST) |
41 U/L * |
< 35 |
|
Alanine transferase (ALT) |
55 U/L * |
< 35 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
135 U/L * |
30 – 110 |
|
Gamma Glutamyl transferase (GGT) |
61 U/L * |
< 40 |
|
Ionised calcium |
1.31 mmol/L * |
1.10 – 1.35 |
|
Calcium corrected |
2.32 mmol/L |
2.12 – 2.62 |
|
Phosphate |
<0.10 mmol/L * |
0.8 – 1.5 |
|
Creatine Kinase |
15 U/L * |
55 – 170 |
|
High sensitivity Troponin T |
11 ng/L * |
<10 ng/L |
a) List the biochemical abnormalities and explain their significance. (2.5 marks)
b) List five most likely causes for the hypophosphataemia. (2.5 marks)
Syllabus topic/section: Section 2.1.7 Renal Intensive Care. Topic Acid-base and Electrolyte Disorders
Discussion:
This question is focused on the understanding of Calcium and Phosphate abnormalities and its relationship with renal and endocrine function in the critically ill.
Question 21.1 was answered well by candidates. Most candidates were able to list the biochemical abnormalities and the causes of hypophosphatemia.
"List the biochemical abnormalities and explain their significance" is a lot for 2.5 marks. These could have included:
Causes:
Ruppe, Mary D., and Suzanne M. Jan de Beur. ". Disorders of Phosphate Homeostasis." Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism (2008): 317-325.
Knochel, James P. "The pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of severe hypophosphatemia." Archives of Internal Medicine 137.2 (1977): 203-220.
Subramanian, Rajesh, and Romesh Khardori. "Severe hypophosphatemia: Pathophysiologic implications, clinical presentations, and treatment." Medicine 79.1 (2000): 1-8.
A patient recently discharged from hospital following a long admission for management of variceal bleeding and decompensated alcoholic cardiomyopathy is referred to the ICU. They have presented to the emergency department with refractory seizures and hypotension.
The biochemistry is as follows:
|
Parameter |
Patient |
Reference |
|
Sodium |
140 mmol/L |
135 – 145 |
|
Potassium |
5.1 mmol/L * |
3.5 – 5.0 |
|
Chloride |
102 mmol/L |
95 – 105 |
|
Bicarbonate |
20 mmol/L * |
22.0 – 26.0 |
|
Glucose |
5.5 mmol/L |
3.5 – 6.0 |
|
Urea |
9.4 mmol/L * |
3.0 – 8.0 |
|
Creatinine |
145 μmol/L * |
45 – 90 |
|
Albumin |
19 g/L * |
35 – 50 |
|
Protein |
75 g/L * |
60 – 80 |
|
Total bilirubin |
24 μmol/L |
< 26 |
|
Aspartate transferase (AST) |
71 U/L * |
< 35 |
|
Alanine transferase (ALT) |
67 U/L * |
< 35 |
|
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
156 U/L * |
30 – 110 |
|
Gamma Glutamyl transferase (GGT) |
72 U/L * |
< 40 |
|
Ionised calcium |
0.61 mmol/L * |
1.10– 1.20 |
a) List five possible causes of these biochemical abnormalities (2.5 marks)
b) List five investigations which would help discriminate between these causes (2.5 marks)
Syllabus topic/section: Section 2.1.7 Renal Intensive Care. Topic Acid-base and Electrolyte Disorders
Discussion:
This question is focused on the understanding of Calcium and Phosphate abnormalities and its relationship with renal and endocrine function in the critically ill.
Many candidates failed to identify severe hypocalaemia and renal dysfunction in Question 21.2. Candidates were awarded marks if they were able to identify the data pattern of hypocalcaemia and renal dysfunction. Candidates who focused on causes of seizure without identifying and corelating it to the biochemical abnormalities were not awarded marks. Examples of investigations acceptable would include Vit D level, PTH and PTH-rp, amylase and lipase.
Five possible causes:
Five investigations:
Cooper, Mark S., and Neil JL Gittoes. "Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia." BMJ: British Medical Journal 336.7656 (2008): 1298.
Tohme, J. F., and J. P. Bilezikian. "Hypocalcemic emergencies." Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 22.2 (1993): 363-375.