These are the methods of discriminating the patients who are malnourished or who are at risk of malnutrition during their ICU stay. In short, one makes a "subjective global assessment of nutritional status" on the basis of history and examination, and then collects supporting anthropometric and laboratory data, which can be used to monitor response to therapy. Previous SAQs on this topic have included:
- Question 23 from the first paper of 2020
- Question 14 from the second paper of 2016,
- Question 20 from the second paper of 2010
An approach to the assessment of nutritional status
- Premorbid weight and the pattern of its change
- Premorbid nutritional routine
- Diseases affecting gastrointestinal function (eg. coeliac disease)
- Disease affecting satiety control (eg. Prader-Willi syndrome)
- Factors influencing metabolic substrate utilisation (eg. thyroid dysfunction, hypoadrenalism, Cushings disease or corticosteroid therapy)
- Observed quality of nails and hair (an indicator of chronic protein intake)
- Subcutaneous fat measurements (triceps)
- Muscle bulk and muscle tone of quadriceps and deltoids
- Presence of oedema and ascites
- Evidence of any specific micronutrient deficiency
- Ideal body weight
- Lean body mass
Biochemistry and physiology:
- Cholesterol and triglycerides
- Random BSL
- Serum cortisol
- FBC for lymphocyte count
- Albumin and prealbumin
- Calculation of nitrogen balance
- Micronutrient levels:
- Fat-soluble vitamins A, D and E
- Vitamin B12
- Delayed hypersensitivity skin-testing
Subjective Global Assessment of Nutritional Status
This technique is a wholistic history-and-examination guided method of classifying a patient as well nourished, moderately malnourished, or severely malnourished. It can be combined with supportive anthropometric indices, and with biochemical analysis of endocrine and metabolic function.
The value of albumin as an indicator of chronic nutritional status
In short, it has none. Even the patholgists agree. Albumin is what one might call a "negative acute phase protein", and one's production of albumin is among the first frivolities sacrificed by the fascist austerity measures of the hypercatabolic stress response. In critical illness, the serum albumin is not a reliable measure of nutritional status, because (almost by definition) everybody in ICU is sufficiently unwell to have a vigorous stress response, and markedly diminished albumin production. It is probably more related to the severity of the illness (by magnitude of its decrease, rather like a magnitude of increase in the CRP). However, it has seemed attractive in the past, because its production is also sacrificed in chronic malnutrition, and it has a long halflife.
The value of prealbumin as an indicator of recent nutritional status
Prealbumin is perhaps slighly more useful than albumin as a means of assessing recent nutrition. Its halflife is only 2 days, which means that its levels will fall rapidly if your stressed-out body has recently prioritised the synthesis of CRP and fibrinogen. In fact, it seems prealbumin levels are inversely proportional to CRP. So in ICU a single prealbumin level is probably meaningless. However, sequential measurements can be used to assess the adequacy of nutritional support. There has been at least one study which has demonstrated that for an ICU patient, an increase in prealbumin indicates that at least 65% of protein-energy needs have been met.
Investigations of uncertain value and experimental interest
Calculation of nitrogen balance
The equation for calculating nitrogen balance is as follows:
Obviously, the inconvenience of 24-hour urine collection and the wild inaccuracy of this tecnique have limited its clinical use. The errors tend to overestimate intake and underestimate output, thereby leading to falsely positive balances. Intake, after all, is dependent on a working gut (and who in the ICU can confidently report one of those?). Urinary output can be measured, but what of sweat and faecal losses? And what if the patient produces no urine? Don't get me started on nitrogen balance in dialysis.
Delayed skin hypersensitivity testing
The repsonse to skin-prick hypersensitivity testing is a very indirect method of assessing ntritional status. It rests on the premise that malnutrition results in decreased lymphocyte number and function, which in turn will result in a delayed response to skin-prick testing. This has been observed in 1973 among malnourished children, an it is possible that somebody somewhere did this routinely to adults, but interest in this practice has been lost since perhaps the early 1980s, and now it is only found in CICM college answers.