Clinical testing for neurolifgcal determination of death is a Level 1 topic from Section 2.1.15 in the CICM Syllabus for the Second Part Examination (2nd ed), where all the topics are Level 1 topics.
It is therefore nor surprising as to how frequently this comes up in the SAQs and vivas. The most "examinable" aspects are the preconditions to testing, the precise sequence of testing, which cranial nerves are involved, and the expected findings of the apnoea test.
The ANZIC Statement on Death and Organ Donation is the main resource for this. It has been revised many times and trainees reading back to questions from the distant past should not be surprised to see comments or answers which do not seem relevant to the modern version of the Statement. Throughout the process, over many years, the one thing that has remained consistent is the college expectation of near-verbatim recall of this document, and a thorough familiarity with all of the specific criteria. This should cut down the cognitive load of making summaries and agonising over whether something is important enough to include or not: in this specific case everything is important and the trainee should take a detailed knowledge of this statement into the exam. One possible caveat to this is the gradual transition of focus away from memorised branstem reflex testing routines (as they are documented on all the standard forms anyway) and towards things like preconditions and the validity of radiological tests.
Previous SAQs on this subject include the following:
OR:
The below preconditions are taken directly from the Statement.
These are tested in sequence. All reflexes must be absent.
Apnoea testing must be carried out only after the brainstem reflexes have been tested, and if any of them were found to be positive any further brain death testing cannot continue.
To get through this without making the patient desperately hypoxic, the college permit mild hypoventilation (to a CO2 of 45). If the patient does become hypoxic, a couple of mandatory breaths are permitted to restore oxygenation, before carrying on with the process.
The ANZICS statement reports that there has never been a documented case of anybody who fulfilled the above brain death criteria, and the preconditions for brain death, who has ever recovered any brain function.
For a more comprehensive overview, a good (ancient) article from the Acta Neurochirurgica describes what the authors have quaintly termed "Spinal Man", a species of human bereft of higher cortical function, which is a creature reliant purely on spinal reflexes.
Additionally, a more recent article discusses the various physiological responses to apnoea testing, including all the various cardiovascular derangements which occur.
Thus:
a) - a seizure - rules out brain death
b) - a positive caloric reflex - is a brainstem reflex which is still working, and it rules out brain death
c) - arm flexion to ipsilateral painful stimulus - could be a spinal reflex, and does not rule out brain death.
d) - a Lazarus sign - does not rule out brain death
e) - a hypercapnea-associated catecholamine surge - can occur with zero cerebral input, and does not rule out brain death.
Of the pages in Deranged Physiology, for some reason, this page generates the greatest amount of geographical confusion from readers who remain unpersuaded by the earlier reference to the ANZICS statement and assume that the content is regionally specific to their own region. This page is of course specific for Australia and New Zealand, as this is the area where the author practices, having no knowledge beyond the purely theoretical when it comes to brain death diagnosis in other countrie. As such, the guidance and values in this page will not be representative of everybody's local guidelines. For example, the UK FICM have their own processes which are slightly different and reported in kPa (the 2025 AoMRC Code requires a starting PaCO₂ of at least 5.3 kPa, at least five minutes of apnoea, and a rise in PaCO₂ of at least 2.7 kPa from baseline, with an end PaCO₂ of at least 8.0 kPa and arterial pH below 7.3). Something entirely different happens in the US.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. “The Statement on Death and Organ Donation.” Edition 4.1, 2021.
McNair, N. L., and K. J. Meador. "The undulating toe flexion sign in brain death." Movement disorders 7.4 (1992): 345-347.
Jørgensen, E. O. "Spinal man after brain death." Acta neurochirurgica 28.4 (1973): 259-273.
Ropper, Allan H. "Unusual spontaneous movements in brain‐dead patients."Neurology 34.8 (1984): 1089-1089.
Heytens, Luc, et al. "Lazarus sign and extensor posturing in a brain-dead patient: case report." Journal of neurosurgery 71.3 (1989): 449-451.
Lang, C. J. G., and J. G. Heckmann. "Apnea testing for the diagnosis of brain death." Acta neurologica scandinavica 112.6 (2005): 358-369.